Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "In Sil Choi"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
General
Association between Tumor Size at the Time of Disease Progression and Survival Outcomes
Chi Hoon Maeng, Bum Jun Kim, Myung-Ju Ahn, In Sil Choi, Dae Young Zang, Bo-Hyung Kim, Minji Kwon, Dae Seog Heo, Bhumsuk Keam
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(2):362-368.   Published online October 22, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.690
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study evaluates the prognostic significance of tumor size at disease progression (PD) and depth of response (DOR) in cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
We performed post hoc analysis using data from six prospective clinical trials conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group. Patients with tumor size at PD was categorized into ‘Mild PD’ and ‘Significant PD’ based on the cutoff values of relative change from baseline using maximally selected rank statistics. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between PD and DOR categories.
Results
Among the 194 evaluable patients, 130 experienced PD. A 35.48% decrease from baseline in tumor size at PD was chosen for the cutoff between mild and significant PD for OS (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ −35.48%; significant PD > −35.48%). The mild PD had superior OS compared to the significant PD (25.8 vs. 12.8 months; Hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.266-0.843, p=0.009). When using an exploratory cutoff based on whether the tumor size was below vs. exceeded from the baseline (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ 0%; significant PD > 0%), OS remained significantly longer in the mild PD (17.1 vs. 11.8 months; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.392-0.932, p=0.021). The greatest DOR was associated with the longest OS and PFS (p<0.001 for both).
Conclusion
Tumor size at PD and DOR were significant prognostic factors for progressive disease. Maintaining a sufficiently reduced tumor size even during PD was associated with better survival outcomes.
  • 1,373 View
  • 117 Download
Close layer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Second-Line Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Individual Patient-Level Data of Randomized Trials
Jaewon Hyung, Minsu Kang, Ilhwan Kim, Kyu-pyo Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Ji-Won Kim, In Sil Choi, Jin Hyun Park, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Jin Won Kim, Changhoon Yoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(2):519-527.   Published online October 17, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.652
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head.
Materials and Methods
We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens.
Results
A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusion
Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Liposomal irinotecan for previously treated patients with biliary tract cancer: A pooled analysis of NIFTY and NALIRICC trials
    Changhoon Yoo, Anna Saborowski, Jaewon Hyung, Patrick Wenzel, Ilhwan Kim, Henning Wege, Kyu-pyo Kim, Gunnar Folprecht, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Phillip Schütt, Jaekyung Cheon, Thorsten Götze, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Arndt Vogel
    Journal of Hepatology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 1,633 View
  • 139 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety between Combination Therapy and Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (KCSG ST13-10)
Keun-Wook Lee, Dae Young Zang, Min-Hee Ryu, Hye Sook Han, Ki Hyang Kim, Mi-Jung Kim, Sung Ae Koh, Sung Sook Lee, Dong-Hoe Koo, Yoon Ho Ko, Byeong Seok Sohn, Jin Won Kim, Jin Hyun Park, Byung-Ho Nam, In Sil Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1250-1260.   Published online May 25, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.333
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study evaluated whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) as first-line chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
Elderly (≥ 70 years) chemo-naïve patients with MRGC were allocated to receive either combination therapy (group A: 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/cisplatin, or S-1/cisplatin) or monotherapy (group B: 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1). In group A, starting doses were 80% of standard doses, and they could be escalated to 100% at the discretion of the investigator. Primary endpoint was to confirm superior overall survival (OS) of combination therapy vs. monotherapy.
Results
After 111 of the planned 238 patients were randomized, enrollment was terminated due to poor accrual. In the full-analysis population (group A [n=53] and group B [n=51]), median OS of combination therapy vs. monotherapy was 11.5 vs. 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.30; p=0.231). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 vs. 3.7 months (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83; p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, patients aged 70-74 years tended to have superior OS with combination therapy (15.9 vs. 7.2 months, p=0.056). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred more frequently in group A vs. group B. However, among severe TRAEs (≥ grade 3), there were no TRAEs with a frequency difference of > 5%.
Conclusion
Combination therapy was associated with numerically improved OS, although statistically insignificant, and a significant PFS benefit compared with monotherapy. Although combination therapy showed more frequent TRAEs, there was no difference in the frequency of severe TRAEs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Anlotinib plus toripalimab as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer and performance status 2: the phase II APICAL-GC trial
    Ke Liu, Bao-Dong Qin, Shi-Qi Chen, Xue Zhong, Xiao-Peng Duan, Ying Wu, Zhan Wang, Yan Ling, Li Sun, Chen-Yang Ye, Dong-Min Shi, Ning Gao, Xiao-Dong Jiao, Yuan-Sheng Zang
    Nature Communications.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival of patients with initially diagnosed metastatic gastric cancer: a validation study in a Chinese cohort
    Ziming Zhao, Erxun Dai, Bao Jin, Ping Deng, Zulihaer Salehebieke, Bin Han, Rongfan Wu, Zhaowu Yu, Jun Ren
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2024; 27(1): 135.     CrossRef
  • 4,459 View
  • 307 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
BCL2 Regulation according to Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer by Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas Database
Ki-Tae Hwang, Kwangsoo Kim, Ji Hyun Chang, Sohee Oh, Young A Kim, Jong Yoon Lee, Se Hee Jung, In Sil Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):658-669.   Published online July 4, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.134
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
We investigated B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) regulation across DNA, RNA, protein, and methylation status according to molecular subtype of breast cancer using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.
Materials and Methods
We analyzed clinical and biological data on 1,096 breast cancers from the TCGA database. Biological data included reverse phase protein array (RPPA), mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq), mRNA microarray, methylation, copy number alteration linear, copy number alteration nonlinear, and mutation data.
Results
The luminal A and luminal B subtypes showed upregulated expression of RPPA and mRNAseq and hypomethylation compared to the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and triple-negative subtypes (all p < 0.001). No mutations were found in any subjects. High mRNA-seq and high RPPA were strongly associated with positive estrogen receptor, positive progesterone receptor (all p < 0.001), and negative HER2 (p < 0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between protein and mRNA levels and a strong negative correlation between methylation and protein and mRNA levels (all p < 0.001). The high BCL2 group showed superior overall survival compared to the low BCL2 group (p=0.006).
Conclusion
The regulation of BCL2 was mainly associated with methylation across the molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and luminal A and luminal B subtypes showed upregulated expression of BCL2 protein, mRNA, and hypomethylation. Although copy number alteration may have played a minor role, mutation status was not related to BCL2 regulation. Upregulation of BCL2 was associated with superior prognosis than downregulation of BCL2.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • AL16ALA-SOD2 polymorphism predicts recurrence risk of breast cancer in patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen
    Maiquidieli Dal Berto, Laura Martin Manfroi, Aniúsca Vieira dos Santos, Giovana Tavares dos Santos, Gabriela Krüger da Costa, Camila Macedo Boaro, Péttala Rigon, Rafael José Vargas Alves, Claudia Giuliano Bica
    Advances in Cancer Biology - Metastasis.2023; 8: 100108.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with HER2-low breast cancer
    Xin Yang, Yao Li, Xu lu, Xiaotian Ren, Bin Hua
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of a prediction model for radiotherapy response among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on the tumor immune microenvironment and hypoxia signature
    Guang‐Li Zhu, Kai‐Bin Yang, Cheng Xu, Rui‐Jia Feng, Wen‐Fei Li, Jun Ma
    Cancer Medicine.2022; 11(23): 4673.     CrossRef
  • Significance of Bcl-2 expression in breast cancer
    Nitika Kumari, Natarajan Suresh, Josephine A.
    Biomedicine.2022; 42(4): 775.     CrossRef
  • Detecting the expression of HRs and BCL2 via IHC can help identify luminal A-like subtypes of triple-positive breast cancers
    Yingying Xu, Yonghao Liang, Guanghao Yin
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2022; 25(4): 1024.     CrossRef
  • Early stability and late random tumor progression of a HER2-positive primary breast cancer patient-derived xenograft
    Lorena Landuzzi, Arianna Palladini, Claudio Ceccarelli, Sofia Asioli, Giordano Nicoletti, Veronica Giusti, Francesca Ruzzi, Marianna L. Ianzano, Laura Scalambra, Roberta Laranga, Tania Balboni, Maddalena Arigoni, Martina Olivero, Raffaele A. Calogero, Car
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic influences of BCL1 and BCL2 expression on disease-free survival in breast cancer
    Ki-Tae Hwang, Young A. Kim, Jongjin Kim, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Jeong Hwan Park, In Sil Choi, Jin Hyun Park, Sohee Oh, Ajung Chu, Jong Yoon Lee, Kyu Ri Hwang
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • p53 and BLC2 Immunohistochemical Expression Across Molecular Subtypes in 1099 Early Breast Cancer Patients With Long-Term Follow-up: An Observational Study
    Alessandra Fabi, Marcella Mottolese, Anna Di Benedetto, Francesca Sperati, Cristiana Ercolani, Simonetta Buglioni, Cecilia Nisticò, Gianluigi Ferretti, Patrizia Vici, Letizia Perracchio, Paola Malaguti, Michelangelo Russillo, Claudio Botti, Edoardo Pescar
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(6): e761.     CrossRef
  • Methylation of the NT5E Gene Is Associated with Poor Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer
    Young Ju Jeong, Hoon Kyu Oh, Hye Ryeon Choi, Sung Hwan Park
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(11): 939.     CrossRef
  • Differential responses of epithelial cells from urinary and biliary tract to eggs of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni
    Rafael Nacif-Pimenta, Alessandra da Silva Orfanó, Ilana A. Mosley, Shannon E. Karinshak, Kenji Ishida, Victoria H. Mann, Paulo Marcos Zech Coelho, José M. Correia da Costa, Michael H. Hsieh, Paul J. Brindley, Gabriel Rinaldi
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A CTC-Cluster-Specific Signature Derived from OMICS Analysis of Patient-Derived Xenograft Tumors Predicts Outcomes in Basal-Like Breast Cancer
    Hariprasad Thangavel, Carmine De Angelis, Suhas Vasaikar, Raksha Bhat, Mohit Kumar Jolly, Chandandeep Nagi, Chad J. Creighton, Fengju Chen, Lacey E. Dobrolecki, Jason T. George, Tanya Kumar, Noor Mazin Abdulkareem, Sufeng Mao, Agostina Nardone, Mothaffar
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(11): 1772.     CrossRef
  • BCL2L12: a multiply spliced gene with independent prognostic significance in breast cancer
    Athina Kladi-Skandali, Diamantis C. Sideris, Andreas Scorilas
    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).2018; 57(2): 276.     CrossRef
  • 16,123 View
  • 334 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
CA19-9 or CEA Decline after the First Cycle of Treatment Predicts Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Treated with S-1 and Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Dae-Won Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Yu Jung Kim, Yaewon Yang, Jiyoung Rhee, Im Il Na, Kyung-Hun Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Sae-Won Han, In Sil Choi, Do-Youn Oh, Jee Hyun Kim, Tae-You Kim, Yung-Jue Bang
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):807-815.   Published online January 18, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.326
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
While tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA 19-9] and carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) can aid in the diagnosis of biliary tract cancer, their prognostic role has not been clearly elucidated. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic role of tumor markers and tumor marker change in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Materials and Methods
Patients with pathologically proven metastatic or relapsed biliary tract cancer who were treated in a phase II trial of first-line S-1 and cisplatin chemotherapy were enrolled. Serum tumor markers were measured at baseline and after the first cycle of chemotherapy.
Results
Among a total of 104 patients, 80 (77%) had elevated baseline tumor markers (69 with CA 19-9 elevation and 40 with CEA). A decline ≥ 30% of the elevated tumor marker level after the first cycle of chemotherapy conferred an improved time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and better chemotherapy response. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor marker decline as an independent positive prognostic factor of TTP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p=0.003) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.37; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results in each group of patients with CA 19-9 elevation and CEA elevation. In addition, elevated baseline CEA was associated with poor survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Tumor marker decline was associated with improved survival in biliary tract cancer. Measuring tumor marker after the first cycle of chemotherapy can be used as an early assessment of treatment outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in North-Central India and association of immunological markers, NLR, MLR and PLR in the diagnostic/prognostic prediction of GBC
    Jyotsna Singh, Durgesh Shukla, Sanjiv Gupta, Braj Raj Shrivastav, Pramod Kumar Tiwari
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2021; 28: 100431.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei—A Novel Treatment Approach
    Aruna Prabhu, Andreas Brandl, Satoshi Wakama, Shouzou Sako, Haruaki Ishibashi, Akiyoshi Mizumoto, Nobuyuki Takao, Kousuke Noguchi, Shunsuke Motoi, Masumi Ichinose, Yang Liu, Yutaka Yonemura
    Cancers.2020; 12(8): 2212.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Translational Research Challenges in Biliary Tract Cancers
    Angela Lamarca, Melissa Frizziero, Mairéad G. McNamara, Juan W. Valle
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2020; 27(29): 4756.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors in unresectable gallbladder cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin
    Min su You, Ji Kon Ryu, Young Hoon Choi, Jin Ho Choi, Gunn Huh, Woo Hyun Paik, Sang Hyub Lee, Yong-Tae Kim
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of interventional therapy and effect on inflammatory factors in patients with gastric cancer after chemotherapy
    Puzhao Wu, Jing Wang
    Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CA19-9 kinetics during systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer
    Naminatsu Takahara, Yousuke Nakai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Kei Saito, Kensaku Noguchi, Tatsunori Suzuki, Tomoka Nakamura, Tatsuya Sato, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Rie Uchino, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogure, Minoru Tada
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2017; 80(6): 1105.     CrossRef
  • 13,262 View
  • 203 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Value of Axillary Nodal Ratio after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Se Hyun Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Tae-Yong Kim, Seock-Ah Im, In Sil Choi, Yee Soo Chae, Sun Kyung Baek, Seok Yun Kang, Sarah Park, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Yoon Ji Choi, Soohyeon Lee, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Yeon-Hee Park, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin-Hee Ahn, Sung-Bae Kim, Jee Hyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1373-1381.   Published online March 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.475
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective analysis is based on the data of 814 patientswith stage II/III breast cancer treated with four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel before surgery. We evaluated the clinical significance of LNR (3 categories: low 0-0.20 vs. intermediate 0.21-0.65 vs. high 0.66-1.00) using a Cox proportional regression model.
Results
A total of 799 patients underwent breast surgery. Pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/isN0) was achieved in 129 patients (16.1%) (hormone receptor [HR] +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] –, 34/373 [9.1%]; HER2+, 45/210 [21.4%]; triple negative breast cancer, 50/216 [23.1%]). The mean numbers of involved LN and retrieved LN were 2.70 (range, 0 to 42) and 13.98 (range, 1 to 64), respectively. The mean LNR was 0.17 (low, 574 [71.8%]; intermediate, 170 [21.3%]; high, 55 [6.9%]). In univariate analysis, LNR showed significant association with a worse relapse-free survival (3-year relapse-free survival rate 84.8% in low vs. 66.2% in intermediate vs. 54.3% in high; p < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, LNR did not show significant association with recurrence after adjusting for other clinical factors (age, histologic grade, subtype, ypT stage, ypN stage, lymphatic or vascular invasion, and pCR). In subgroup analysis, the LNR system had good prognostic value in HR+/HER2– subtype.
Conclusion
LNR is not superior to ypN stage in predicting clinical outcome of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the prognostic value of the LNR system in HR+/HER2– patients is notable and worthy of further investigation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
    Zhe Wang, Wei Chong, Huikun Zhang, Xiaoli Liu, Yawen Zhao, Zhifang Guo, Li Fu, Yongjie Ma, Feng Gu
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic role of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A dose-response meta-analysis
    Jinzhao Liu, Yifei Li, Weifang Zhang, Chenhui Yang, Chao Yang, Liang Chen, Mingjian Ding, Liang Zhang, Xiaojun Liu, Guozhong Cui, Yunjiang Liu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic implications of regression of metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Yul Ri Chung, Ji Won Woo, Soomin Ahn, Eunyoung Kang, Eun-Kyu Kim, Mijung Jang, Sun Mi Kim, Se Hyun Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, So Yeon Park
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using a novel T-lymph node ratio model to evaluate the prognosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients who received preoperative radiotherapy followed by mastectomy
    Yang Wang, Yuanyuan Zhao, Song Liu, Weifang Tang, Hong Gao, Xucai Zheng, Shikai Hong, Shengying Wang
    Medicine.2017; 96(42): e8203.     CrossRef
  • The genetic variants in the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway predict susceptibility and CE(A)F chemotherapy response to breast cancer and clinical outcomes
    Xiang Li, Ruishan Zhang, Zhuangkai Liu, Shuang Li, Hong Xu
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(12): 20252.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Inner Quadrant Involvement in Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ji Hyun Chang, Wan Jeon, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Yung-Jue Bang
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2016; 19(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • 12,126 View
  • 163 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
A Unique Case of Erdheim-Chester Disease with Axial Skeleton, Lymph Node, and Bone Marrow Involvement
Jin Lim, Ki Hwan Kim, Koung Jin Suh, Kyung Ah Yoh, Jin Young Moon, Ji Eun Kim, Eun Youn Roh, In Sil Choi, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin Hyun Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):415-421.   Published online February 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.160
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Erdheim-Chester disease is a rare non-Langerhans–cell histiocytosis with bone and organ involvement. A 76-year-old man presented with low back pain and a history of visits for exertional dyspnea. We diagnosed him with anemia of chronic disease, cytopenia related to chronic illness, chronic renal failure due to hypertension, and hypothyroidism. However, we could not determine a definite cause or explanation for the cytopenia. Multiple osteosclerotic axial skeleton lesions and axillary lymph node enlargement were detected by computed tomography. Bone marrow biopsy revealed histiocytic infiltration, which was CD68-positive and CD1a-negative. This report describes an unusual presentation of Erdheim-Chester disease involving the bone marrow, axial skeleton, and lymph nodes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Erdheim Chester Disease Mimicking Lymphoma: A Case Report
    Philipp Moritz Wunschel, Wolfgang Voss, Marc Keberle
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.2022; 194(03): 310.     CrossRef
  • Myelopathy Secondary to Isolated Thoracic Spine Involvement Mimicking Metastasis in Erdheim–Chester Disease
    Rajesh Rajavelu, Ajoy P. Shetty, Rishi M. Kanna, S Rajasekaran
    Indian Spine Journal.2021; 4(1): 133.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosing a Patient with Erdheim-Chester Disease during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Georgia Kaiafa, Dimitrios Pilalas, Triantafyllia Koletsa, Stylianos Daios, Georgios Arsos, Adam Hatzidakis, Adonis Protopapas, Kostas Stamatopoulos, Christos Savopoulos
    Medicina.2021; 57(10): 1001.     CrossRef
  • Case of Erdheim–Chester presenting with xanthelasma-like eruption and osteolytic bone lesions: A case report
    Evelyn Alarcon Chinchilla, Marie-Pascale Gourde, Karine Turcotte, Steve Mathieu, Mohamed Amin-Hashem
    SAGE Open Medical Case Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Erdheim-Chester Disease Involving Lymph Nodes and Liver Clinically Mimicking Lymphoma: A Case Report
    Yeoun Eun Sung, Yoon Seo Lee, Jieun Lee, Kyo Young Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2018; 52(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • Resolved heart tamponade and controlled exophthalmos, facial pain and diabetes insipidus due to Erdheim-Chester disease
    Jaume Monmany, Esther Granell, Laura López, Pere Domingo
    BMJ Case Reports.2018; 2018: bcr-2018-225224.     CrossRef
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT in Erdheim–Chester Disease: Imaging Findings and Potential BRAF Mutation Biomarker
    Jason R. Young, Geoffrey B. Johnson, Robert C. Murphy, Ronald S. Go, Stephen M. Broski
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine.2018; 59(5): 774.     CrossRef
  • Erdheim-Chester Disease with Emperipolesis: A Unique Case Involving the Heart
    Pengcheng Zhu, Naping Li, Lu Yu, Mariajose Navia Miranda, Guoping Wang, Yaqi Duan
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2017; 49(2): 553.     CrossRef
  • 19,035 View
  • 97 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Oxaliplatin, 5-FU, Folinic Acid as First-line Palliative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer
In Sil Choi, Do-Youn Oh, Byoung-Su Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Jong-Seok Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2007;39(3):99-103.   Published online September 30, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2007.39.3.99
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

We investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) as first-line palliative chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

The study patients were chemotherapy-naïve patients (> 65 years old) with histologically confirmed, metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and FA 100 mg/m2 (2-hour infusion), and then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 (46-hour continuous infusion) every 2 weeks.

Results

A total of 37 patients were studied between April 2004 and October 2006. Of the 34 evaluable patients, none achieved a complete response (CR) and 14 achieved a partial response (PR), resulting in an overall response rate of 41.2%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.2~6.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI: 4.4~12.0 months). The main hematologic toxicities were anemia and neutropenia, which were observed in 56.7% and 32.4% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 8.1% of the patients. None of the patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 35.1% of the patients and all were grade 1/2.

Conclusion

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen showed good efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Fabrication and evaluation of smart pH/thermo dual-responsive injectable intratumoral in situ depot hydrogels for controlled 5-FU delivery
    Samiullah Khan, Bangul Khan, Huan Li
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma in older patients in the era of immunotherapy. A review of the literature
    C. de la Fouchardiere, L. Decoster, E. Samalin, C. Terret, C. Kenis, J.P. Droz, C. Coutzac, E. Smyth
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2021; 100: 102289.     CrossRef
  • Fabrication, rheological analysis, and in vitro characterization of in situ chemically cross‐linkable thermogels as controlled and prolonged drug depot for localized and systemic delivery
    Samiullah Khan, Naveed Akhtar, Muhammad Usman Minhas
    Polymers for Advanced Technologies.2019; 30(3): 755.     CrossRef
  • pH/Thermo-Dual Responsive Tunable In Situ Cross-Linkable Depot Injectable Hydrogels Based on Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide)/Carboxymethyl Chitosan with Potential of Controlled Localized and Systemic Drug Delivery
    Samiullah Khan, Naveed Akhtar, Muhammad Usman Minhas, Syed Faisal Badshah
    AAPS PharmSciTech.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CHEMOTHERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH STOMACH CANCER
    O. A. Koroleva, L. M. Kogoniya, M. M. Byakhova, A. G. Titov
    Malignant tumours.2018; 8(2): 64.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Efficacy of Dose-dense Chemotherapy with TCF Regimen in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
    Wanda Liguigli, Gianluca Tomasello, Laura Toppo, Rossana Poli, Silvia Lazzarelli, Federica Negri, Bruno Perrucci, Alessandra Curti, Matteo Brighenti, Gianvito Donati, Morena Nazzari, Mario Martinotti, Marco Vismarra, Massimo Rovatti, Rodolfo Passalacqua
    Tumori Journal.2017; 103(1): 93.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI Regimen in Elderly Versus Nonelderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal or Gastric Cancer
    Ji-Won Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Yong Sang Hong, Jeong-Eun Kim, Sun Young Kim, Sook Ryun Park, Byung-Ho Nam, Sang-Hee Cho, Ik-Joo Chung, Young Suk Park, Ho-Suk Oh, Myung-Ah Lee, Hye Jin Kang, Young Iee Park, Eun-Kee Song, Hye Sook Han,
    The Oncologist.2017; 22(3): 293.     CrossRef
  • Facile synthesis of gold nanorods/hydrogels core/shell nanospheres for pH and near-infrared-light induced release of 5-fluorouracil and chemo-photothermal therapy
    Hui Jin, Xifeng Liu, Rijun Gui, Zonghua Wang
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2015; 128: 498.     CrossRef
  • Retracted Article: Facile synthesis of quantum dots/mesoporous silica/quantum dots core/shell/shell hybrid microspheres for ratiometric fluorescence detection of 5-fluorouracil in human serum
    Rijun Gui, Ajun Wan, Hui Jin
    The Analyst.2013; 138(20): 5956.     CrossRef
  • A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients with associated diseases
    Vincenzo Catalano, Renato Bisonni, Francesco Graziano, Paolo Giordani, Paolo Alessandroni, Anna Maria Baldelli, Virginia Casadei, David Rossi, Stefano Luzi Fedeli, Silvia D’Emidio, Lucio Giustini, Giammaria Fiorentini
    Gastric Cancer.2013; 16(3): 411.     CrossRef
  • FOLFOX-4 Combination Chemotherapy as a First-line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Cheon Woo Lee, Moo-In Park, Seun Ja Park, Won Moon, Hyung Hun Kim, Hae Won Lee, Ki Hwan Ku, Bu Kyung Kim
    Korean Journal of Medicine.2012; 82(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Biomarker analysis in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy: orotate phosphoribosyltransferase expression is associated with treatment outcomes
    In Sil Choi, Hye Seung Lee, Keun-Wook Lee, Haeryoung Kim, Ki Hwan Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Woo Ho Kim, Jong Seok Lee
    Medical Oncology.2011; 28(4): 991.     CrossRef
  • Biodegradable and thermo-sensitive chitosan-g-poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) nanoparticles as a 5-fluorouracil carrier
    N. Sanoj Rejinold, K.P. Chennazhi, S.V. Nair, H. Tamura, R. Jayakumar
    Carbohydrate Polymers.2011; 83(2): 776.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Folinic Acid Combination Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer
    Han Jo Kim, Jun Young Eun, Young Woo Jeon, Jina Yun, Kyoung Ha Kim, Se Hyung Kim, Hyun Jung Kim, Sang-Cheol Lee, Sang Byung Bae, Chan Kyu Kim, Nam Su Lee, Kyu Taek Lee, Seong-Kyu Park, Jong-Ho Won, Dae Sik Hong, Hee Sook Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2011; 43(3): 154.     CrossRef
  • Survival benefit of gastrectomy ± metastasectomy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy
    Ki Hwan Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Sun Kyung Baek, Hye Jung Chang, Yu Jung Kim, Do Joong Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Hyung-Ho Kim, Jong Seok Lee
    Gastric Cancer.2011; 14(2): 130.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin and Leucovorin Plus Fluorouracil Versus Irinotecan and Leucovorin Plus Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy as a First-line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic or Recurred Gastric Adenocarcinoma
    Sun Hyung Kang, Jeong Il Kim, Hee Seok Moon, Seok Hyun Kim, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2010; 55(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Three-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer
    In Sil Choi, Keun-Wook Lee, Ki Hwan Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Jong Seok Lee
    Medical Oncology.2010; 27(3): 992.     CrossRef
  • Three-Weekly S-1 Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
    Joo Han Lim, Moon Hee Lee, Hyung Gil Kim, Yong Woon Shin, Hyeon Gyu Yi, Seok Hwan Shin, Yoon Seok Hur, Chul Soo Kim, Hye Jeong Chang
    Gut and Liver.2010; 4(4): 503.     CrossRef
  • Chemotherapy-induced transient CEA and CA19-9 surges in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer
    Hye Jin Kim, Keun-wook Lee, Yu Jung Kim, Do-youn Oh, Jee Hyun Kim, Seock-ah Im, Jong Seok Lee
    Acta Oncologica.2009; 48(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • 10,308 View
  • 82 Download
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Open-label, Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dolasetron Mesylate and Ondansetron in the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-induced Emesis in Cancer Patients
Jin-Soo Kim, Ji Yeon Baek, Sook Ryun Park, In Sil Choi, Sang-Il Kim, Dong-Wan Kim, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Dae Seog Heo, Yung-Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(6):372-376.   Published online December 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.6.372
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron in the prevention of acute and delayed emesis.

Material and Methods

From April 2002 through October 2002, a total of 112 patients receiving cisplatin- based combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive a single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg or ondansetron 8 mg, 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. In the ondansetron group, two additional doses of ondansetron 8 mg were given at intervals of 2 to 4 hours. To prevent delayed emesis, dolasetron 200 mg p.o. daily or ondansetron 8 mg p.o. bid was administered from the 2nd days to a maximum of 5 days. The primary end point was the proportion of patients that experienced no emetic episodes and required no rescue medication (complete response, CR) during the 24 hours (acute period) and during Day 2 to Day 5±2 days (delayed period), after chemotherapy. The secondary end points included the incidence and severity of emesis.

Results

105 patients were evaluable for efficacy. CR rates during the acute period were 36.0% for a single dose of dolasetron 100 mg, and 43.6% for three doses of ondansetron 8 mg. CR rates during the delayed period were 8.0% and 10.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two groups. Adverse effects were mostly mild to moderate and not related to study medication.

Conclusions

A single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg is as effective as three i.v. doses of ondansetron 8 mg in preventing acute and delayed emesis after cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with a comparable safety profile.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of ondansetron compared to other serotonin-3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs) used to control chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giovana Paula Rezende Simino, Lays Pires Marra, Eli Iola Gurgel de Andrade, Francisco de Assis Acúrcio, Ilka Afonso Reis, Vânia Eloisa De Araújo, Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia
    Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology.2016; 9(9): 1183.     CrossRef
  • Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review
    Andrea C Tricco, Charlene Soobiah, Wing Hui, Jesmin Antony, Vladi Struchkov, Brian Hutton, Brenda Hemmelgarn, David Moher, Sharon E Straus
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 9,644 View
  • 52 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Discrepancies of the Values on the Withholding Futile Interventions between Physician and Family Members of Terminal Cancer Patients
Do Youn Oh, Mi Ra Kim, In Sil Choi, Yo Han Joh, Byung Su Kim, Do Yeun Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Se Hoon Lee, Tae You Kim, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2001;33(4):350-356.   Published online August 31, 2001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2001.33.4.350
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To analyze the controversies surrounding therapeutic decision-making and the withholding of life- sustaining treatments, values held concerning therapeutic interventions of terminal cancer patients are compared between physicians and family members.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
42 advanced or terminal stage cancer patients were enrolled for the study. The questionnaires were administered to the duty doctor and the family of the patients. Questions included whether to use new agents with a 15% partial efficacy and whether to use opioid analgesics, intravenous nutrition, a feeding tube, antibiotics, and hemodialysis. Additionally, we asked about the administration of CPR, ventilator application, and euthanasia. If the family permitted, the same questionnaires were given to the patients.
RESULTS
Of the 42 cases, 5 families refused to answer the questionnaire. Of the available 37 families, only 5 families permitted access to the patients. Of the 5 patients, 2 patients refused the questionnaire. Only 67.6% and 8.1% of families and the patients clearly understood the stage of cancer. The use of a new agent was accepted by 45.2% of the physicians and 45.9% of the families. The rankings of the acceptance of treatment in the physicians and in the families were similar. The concordance rate between the physicians and the families was lowest on ventilator application and CPR. 31% of the physicians and 43.2% of the families agreed on the issue of euthanasia.
CONCLUSION
Values held on issues like therapeutic decision-making and the withholding of life-sustaining treatments in terminal cancer patients are discordant between physicians and family members. In order to resolve controversies on the role of physicians in end-of-life decisions, the values of physicians as well as patients and their family members should be considered in the final decision-making process.
  • 4,004 View
  • 29 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP