Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
14 "Hong Suk Song"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Treatment Patterns and Changes in Quality of Life during First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Jin Won Kim, Jong Gwang Kim, Byung Woog Kang, Ik-Joo Chung, Young Seon Hong, Tae-You Kim, Hong Suk Song, Kyung Hee Lee, Dae Young Zang, Yoon Ho Ko, Eun-Kee Song, Jin Ho Baek, Dong‐Hoe Koo, So Yeon Oh, Hana Cho, Keun-Wook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):223-239.   Published online October 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.073
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate chemotherapy patterns and changes in quality of life (QOL) during first-line palliative chemotherapy for Korean patients with unresectable or metastatic/recurrent gastric cancer (GC).
Materials and Methods
Thiswas a non-interventional, multi-center, prospective, observational study of 527 patients in Korea. QOL assessments were conducted using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaires (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-STO22 every 3 months over a 12-month period during first-line palliative chemotherapy. The specific chemotherapy regimens were selected by individual clinicians.
Results
Most patients (93.2%) received combination chemotherapy (mainly fluoropyrimidine plus platinum) as their first-line palliative chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.2 and 14.8 months, respectively. Overall, “a little” changes (differences of 5-10 points from baseline)were observed in some of the functioning or symptom scales; none of the QOL scales showed either “moderate” or “very much” change (i.e., ≥ 11 point difference from baseline). When examining the best change in each QOL domain from baseline, scales related to some aspects of functioning, global health status/QOL, and most symptoms revealed significant improvements (p < 0.05). Throughout the course of first-line palliative chemotherapy, most patients’ QOL was maintained to a similar degree, regardless of their actual response to chemotherapy.
Conclusion
This observational study provides important information on the chemotherapy patterns and QOL changes in Korean patientswith advanced GC. Overall, first-line palliative chemotherapy was found to maintain QOL, and most parameters showed an improvement compared with the baseline at some point during the course.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Health-related quality of life with bemarituzumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with FGFR2b-overexpressing, advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer
    Z.A. Wainberg, P.C. Enzinger, S. Qin, K. Yamaguchi, J. Wang, X. Zhou, A. Gnanasakthy, K. Taylor, A. Yusuf, I. Majer, A. Jamotte, Y.-K. Kang
    ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 6: 100095.     CrossRef
  • Impact of systemic cancer treatment on quality of life and mental well-being: a comparative analysis of patients with localized and advanced cancer
    Adán Rodríguez-Gonzalez, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas, Raquel Hernandez San Gil, Patricia Cruz-Castellanos, Mónica Antoñanzas-Basa, David Lorente-Estelles, María Jose Corral, Manuel González-Moya, Oscar Alfredo Castillo-Trujillo, Emilio Esteban, Paula Jiménez-
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2023; 25(12): 3492.     CrossRef
  • Reminiscence therapy-based care program alleviates anxiety and depression, as well as improves the quality of life in recurrent gastric cancer patients
    Xing Wu, Weiwei Zhang
    Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Toxicities and Quality of Life during Cancer Treatment in Advanced Solid Tumors
    Eun Mi Lee, Paula Jiménez-Fonseca, Rocio Galán-Moral, Sara Coca-Membribes, Ana Fernández-Montes, Elena Sorribes, Esmeralda García-Torralba, Laura Puntí-Brun, Mireia Gil-Raga, Juana Cano-Cano, Caterina Calderon
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(10): 9205.     CrossRef
  • Psychosocial functioning in individuals with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a mixed methods systematic review
    Cara Ghiglieri, Martin Dempster, Sam Wright, Lisa Graham-Wisener
    BMC Palliative Care.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial)
    Keun-Wook Lee, Ik-Joo Chung, Min-Hee Ryu, Young Iee Park, Byung-Ho Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Kyung Hee Lee, Hye Sook Han, Bong-Gun Seo, Jae-Cheol Jo, Hyo Rak Lee, Jin Won Kim, Sook Ryun Park, Sang Hee Cho, Yoon-Koo Kang
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(1): 156.     CrossRef
  • Effect of early tumor response on the health-related quality of life among patients on second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the ABSOLUTE trial
    Kazumasa Fujitani, Kohei Shitara, Atsuo Takashima, Keisuke Koeda, Hiroki Hara, Norisuke Nakayama, Shuichi Hironaka, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Yutaka Kimura, Kenji Amagai, Hisashi Hosaka, Yoshito Komatsu, Ken Shimada, Ryohei Kawabata, Hideki Ohdan, Yasuhiro Kode
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(2): 467.     CrossRef
  • Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy: Call for Action
    Maheswari Senthil
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Impact of gastric cancer treatment on quality of life of patients
    Kerstin Schütte, Christian Schulz, Kristina Middelberg-Bisping
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2021; 50-51: 101727.     CrossRef
  • Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer—A Systematic Review
    Sophia Kristina Rupp, Andreas Stengel
    Frontiers in Psychiatry.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Chronological changes in quality of life and body composition after gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer
    Ki Bum Park, Ji Yeon Park, Seung Soo Lee, Ho Young Chung, Oh Kyoung Kwon
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(5): 262.     CrossRef
  • Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome
    Hannah Christina Puhr, Eleonore Pablik, Anna Sophie Berghoff, Gerd Jomrich, Sebastian Friedrich Schoppmann, Matthias Preusser, Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
    ESMO Open.2020; 5(2): e000623.     CrossRef
  • 11,488 View
  • 236 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Phase II Study of Dovitinib in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (KCSG-GU11-05)
Yoon Ji Choi, Hye Sook Kim, Se Hoon Park, Bong-Seog Kim, Kyoung Ha Kim, Hyo Jin Lee, Hong Suk Song, Dong-Yeop Shin, Ha Young Lee, Hoon-Gu Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Jae Lyun Lee, Kyong Hwa Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1252-1259.   Published online January 2, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.438
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signals are important in carcinogenesis and progression of prostate cancer. Dovitinib is an oral, pan-class inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of dovitinib in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Materials and Methods
This study was a single-arm, phase II, open-label, multicenter trial of dovitinib 500 mg/day (5-days-on/2-days-off schedule). The primary endpointwas 16-week progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Biomarker analyses for VEGFR2, FGF23, and FGFR2 using multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed.
Results
Forty-four men were accrued from 11 hospitals. Eighty percent were post-docetaxel. Median PSA was 100 ng/dL, median age was 69, 82% had bone metastases, and 23% had liver metastases. Median cycles of dovitinibwas 2 (range, 0 to 33). Median PFSwas 3.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 5.98) and median OS was 13.70 months (95% CI, 0 to 27.41). Chemotherapy-naïve patients had longer PFS (17.90 months; 95% CI, 9.23 to 28.57) compared with docetaxel-treated patients (2.07 months; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.41; p=0.001) and the patients with high serum VEGFR2 level over median level (7,800 pg/mL) showed longer PFS compared with others (6.03 months [95% CI, 4.26 to 7.80] vs. 1.97 months [95% CI, 1.79 to 2.15], p=0.023). Grade 3 related adverse events were seen in 40.9% of patients. Grade 1-2 nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, and all grade thrombocytopenia are common.
Conclusion
Dovitinib showed modest antitumor activity with manageable toxicities in men with mCRPC. Especially, patients who were chemo-naïve benefitted from dovitinib.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comprehensive Review on Recent Strategies for Management of Prostate Cancer: Therapeutic Targets and SAR
    Manish Chaudhary, Shubham Kumar, Paranjeet Kaur, Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Amit Mittal
    Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 24(7): 721.     CrossRef
  • Impact of cell plasticity on prostate tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic response
    Maddison Archer
    American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Urology.2024; 12(6): 331.     CrossRef
  • Role of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Cancer: Biological Activity, Targeted Therapies, and Prognostic Value
    Alessio Ardizzone, Valentina Bova, Giovanna Casili, Alberto Repici, Marika Lanza, Raffaella Giuffrida, Cristina Colarossi, Marzia Mare, Salvatore Cuzzocrea, Emanuela Esposito, Irene Paterniti
    Cells.2023; 12(7): 1002.     CrossRef
  • Case Report of a Glioma Patient with Homozygous Missense Amino Acid Substitution in KDR Gene
    Kalyan Ram Uppaluri, Himavanth Reddy Kambalachenu, Hima Jyothi Challa, Saadvik Raghuram Y., Deepak Sharma, Ramya Gadicherla, Srinivas Ketavath, Kalyani Palasamudram, Sri Manjari K.
    Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology.2023; 44(03): 356.     CrossRef
  • FGFR families: biological functions and therapeutic interventions in tumors
    Qing Liu, Jiyu Huang, Weiwei Yan, Zhen Liu, Shu Liu, Weiyi Fang
    MedComm.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeting transforming growth factor‐ß signalling for cancer prevention and intervention: Recent advances in developing small molecules of natural origin
    Devesh Tewari, Anu Priya, Anusha Bishayee, Anupam Bishayee
    Clinical and Translational Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of masitinib and expression of its specific targets c‐Kit, PDGFR‐α, PDGFR‐β, and Lyn in canine prostate cancer cell lines
    Katharina Klose, Eva‐Maria Packeiser, José‐Luis Granados‐Soler, Marion Hewicker‐Trautwein, Hugo Murua Escobar, Ingo Nolte
    Veterinary and Comparative Oncology.2022; 20(3): 641.     CrossRef
  • Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant FGFR Inhibition and Androgen Deprivation Therapy Prior to Prostatectomy
    Elizabeth Liow, Nicholas Howard, Chol-Hee Jung, Bernard Pope, Bethany K. Campbell, Anne Nguyen, Michael Kerger, Jonathan B. Ruddle, Angelyn Anton, Benjamin Thomas, Kevin Chu, Philip Dundee, Justin S. Peters, Anthony J. Costello, Andrew S. Ryan, Christophe
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2022; 20(5): 452.     CrossRef
  • There are gremlins in prostate cancer
    Laura A. Sena, W. Nathaniel Brennen, John T. Isaacs
    Nature Cancer.2022; 3(5): 530.     CrossRef
  • Targeting signaling pathways in prostate cancer: mechanisms and clinical trials
    Yundong He, Weidong Xu, Yu-Tian Xiao, Haojie Huang, Di Gu, Shancheng Ren
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Concept of Hybrid Drugs and Recent Advancements in Anticancer Hybrids
    Ankit Kumar Singh, Adarsh Kumar, Harshwardhan Singh, Pankaj Sonawane, Harshali Paliwal, Suresh Thareja, Prateek Pathak, Maria Grishina, Mariusz Jaremko, Abdul-Hamid Emwas, Jagat Pal Yadav, Amita Verma, Habibullah Khalilullah, Pradeep Kumar
    Pharmaceuticals.2022; 15(9): 1071.     CrossRef
  • The FGF/FGFR system in the physiopathology of the prostate gland
    Arianna Giacomini, Elisabetta Grillo, Sara Rezzola, Domenico Ribatti, Marco Rusnati, Roberto Ronca, Marco Presta
    Physiological Reviews.2021; 101(2): 569.     CrossRef
  • Signaling Pathways That Control Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer
    Amaal Ali, George Kulik
    Cancers.2021; 13(5): 937.     CrossRef
  • A Review of the Pathophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
    Fionnuala Crowley, Michelle Sterpi, Conor Buckley, Lauren Margetich, Shivani Handa, Zach Dovey
    Research and Reports in Urology.2021; Volume 13: 457.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Treatment with Angiogenesis-Inhibitor Dovitinib Prior to Local Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase II Study
    F.J. Sherida H. Woei-A-Jin, Nir I. Weijl, Mark C. Burgmans, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, J. Tom van Wezel, Martin N.J.M. Wasser, Minneke J. Coenraad, Jacobus Burggraaf, Susanne Osanto
    The Oncologist.2021; 26(10): 854.     CrossRef
  • Reprogramming of Protein-Targeted Small-Molecule Medicines to RNA by Ribonuclease Recruitment
    Peiyuan Zhang, Xiaohui Liu, Daniel Abegg, Toru Tanaka, Yuquan Tong, Raphael I. Benhamou, Jared Baisden, Gogce Crynen, Samantha M. Meyer, Michael D. Cameron, Arnab K. Chatterjee, Alexander Adibekian, Jessica L. Childs-Disney, Matthew D. Disney
    Journal of the American Chemical Society.2021; 143(33): 13044.     CrossRef
  • Bone microenvironment signaling of cancer stem cells as a therapeutic target in metastatic prostate cancer
    Clara H. Lee, Ann M. Decker, Frank C. Cackowski, Russell S. Taichman
    Cell Biology and Toxicology.2020; 36(2): 115.     CrossRef
  • Brivanib, a multitargeted small‐molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses laser‐induced CNV in a mouse model of neovascular AMD
    Lele Li, Manhui Zhu, Wenli Wu, Bai Qin, Jiayi Gu, Yuanyuan Tu, Jianing Chen, Dong Liu, Yunwei Shi, Xiaojuan Liu, Aimin Sang, Dongmei Ding
    Journal of Cellular Physiology.2020; 235(2): 1259.     CrossRef
  • In Vitro Effect of Dovitinib (TKI258), a Multi-Target Angiokinase Inhibitor on Aggressive Meningioma Cells
    Arabinda Das, Jaime L. Martinez Santos, Mohammed Alshareef, Guilherme Bastos Ferreira Porto, Libby Kosnik Infinger, William A. Vandergrift, Scott M. Lindhorst, Abhay K. Varma, Sunil J. Patel, David Cachia
    Cancer Investigation.2020; 38(6): 349.     CrossRef
  • Potential Role of Targeting KDR and Proteasome Inhibitors in the Therapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Ling Zhang, Xia Niu, Yanghui Bi, Heyang Cui, Hongyi Li, Xiaolong Cheng
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel Therapeutic Strategies for CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer


    Adam M. Kase, John A. Copland, Winston Tan
    OncoTargets and Therapy.2020; Volume 13: 10499.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic implications of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors in a combination regimen for solid tumors (Review)
    Hong Luo, Tao Zhang, Peng Cheng, Dong Li, Oleksandr Ogorodniitchouk, Chaimaa Lahmamssi, Ge Wang, Meiling Lan
    Oncology Letters.2020; 20(3): 2525.     CrossRef
  • Dovitinib Triggers Apoptosis and Autophagic Cell Death by Targeting SHP-1/p-STAT3 Signaling in Human Breast Cancers
    Yi-Han Chiu, Yi-Yen Lee, Kuo-Chin Huang, Cheng-Chi Liu, Chen-Si Lin
    Journal of Oncology.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Tumour-stroma ratio and 5-year mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niko Kemi, Maarit Eskuri, Joonas H. Kauppila
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Investigational fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 antagonists in early phase clinical trials to treat solid tumors
    Dan Wang, Li Yang, Weina Yu, Yi Zhang
    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs.2019; 28(10): 903.     CrossRef
  • A Novel FGFR3 Splice Variant Preferentially Expressed in African American Prostate Cancer Drives Aggressive Phenotypes and Docetaxel Resistance
    Jacqueline Olender, Bi-Dar Wang, Travers Ching, Lana X. Garmire, Kaitlin Garofano, Youngmi Ji, Tessa Knox, Patricia Latham, Kenneth Nguyen, Johng Rhim, Norman H. Lee
    Molecular Cancer Research.2019; 17(10): 2115.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in Prostate Cancer Treatment and Drug Discovery
    Ekaterina Nevedomskaya, Simon J. Baumgart, Bernard Haendler
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(5): 1359.     CrossRef
  • 11,158 View
  • 246 Download
  • 29 Web of Science
  • 27 Crossref
Close layer
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
In Hae Park, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Sung Bae Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Joo Seop Chung, Soo Hyeon Lee, Tae You Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Eun Kyung Cho, Yang Soo Kim, Hong Suk Song, Jae Hong Seo, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sun Ah Lee, So Young Yoon, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Kim, Mi Ryung Jin, Jungsil Ro
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):569-577.   Published online September 12, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol).
Materials and Methods
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).
Results
The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m2 (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m2 (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (pnon-inferiority=0.021, psuperiority=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments.
Conclusion
Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Revolutionizing cancer treatment: ROS-induced apoptosis via nanoformulated alkaloids
    Swathi Putta, Santhosh Kumar Chinnaiyan, Ramadevi Korni, Venkata Radha Gadela
    Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.2025; 104: 106556.     CrossRef
  • Administration of Inhibitory Molecules through Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Therapy
    Christian Rafael Quijia, Andreina Quevedo Enríquez, Carlos Daniel Zappia, Roxana Noemí Peroni, Marlus Chorilli
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 31(6): 726.     CrossRef
  • Innovative strategies for effective paclitaxel delivery: Recent developments and prospects
    Sławomir Wileński, Agnieszka Koper, Paulina Śledzińska, Marek Bebyn, Krzysztof Koper
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2024; 30(2): 367.     CrossRef
  • Effect of zwitterionic sulfobetaine incorporation on blood behaviours, phagocytosis, and in vivo biodistribution of pH-responsive micelles with positive charges
    Chengwei Wang, Hao Liu, Hu Lin, Rui Zhong, Hao Li, Jiaxin Liu, Xianglin Luo, Meng Tian
    Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2024; 12(6): 1652.     CrossRef
  • Reexamining in vivo fate of paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelles
    Shiqi Lin, Yifei Yu, Ercan Wu, Tianhao Ding, Yuxiu Chu, Feng Pan, Yang Yang, Changyou Zhan
    Nano Today.2024; 56: 102255.     CrossRef
  • Functionalized Polymeric Micelles for Targeted Cancer Therapy: Steps from Conceptualization to Clinical Trials
    Ana Serras, Célia Faustino, Lídia Pinheiro
    Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(8): 1047.     CrossRef
  • Polyester nanoparticles delivering chemotherapeutics: Learning from the past and looking to the future to enhance their clinical impact in tumor therapy
    Giuseppe Longobardi, Thomas Lee Moore, Claudia Conte, Francesca Ungaro, Ronit Satchi‐Fainaro, Fabiana Quaglia
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research progress of paclitaxel nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
    Jia-xin Qiao, Dong-yan Guo, Huan Tian, Zhan-peng Wang, Qiang-qiang Fan, Yuan Tian, Jing Sun, Xiao-fei Zhang, Jun-bo Zou, Jiang-xue Cheng, Fei Luan, Bing-tao Zhai
    Materials Today Bio.2024; 29: 101358.     CrossRef
  • Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis of Porous Biomolecule‐Incorporated Metal‐Organic Frameworks as Efficient Nanocarriers for Anti‐Cancer Drugs
    Trang Thi Thu Nguyen, Bao Quang Gia Le, Vy Tran Hanh Nguyen, Jae‐Hyoung Lee, Ngoc Xuan Dat Mai, Linh Ho Thuy Nguyen, Tan Le Hoang Doan
    ChemistrySelect.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Innovative nanotheranostics: Smart nanoparticles based approach to overcome breast cancer stem cells mediated chemo‐ and radioresistances
    Prithwish Kola, Prasanth Kumar Bhusetty Nagesh, Pritam Kumar Roy, K. Deepak, Rui Luis Reis, Subhas C. Kundu, Mahitosh Mandal
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer metastases: Current and future perspectives
    Mangala Hegde, Nikunj Naliyadhara, Jyothsna Unnikrishnan, Mohammed S. Alqahtani, Mohamed Abbas, Sosmitha Girisa, Gautam Sethi, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara
    Cancer Letters.2023; 556: 216066.     CrossRef
  • Influence of lung cancer model characteristics on tumor targeting behavior of nanodrugs
    Weixia Xu, Shengmin Yang, Linwei Lu, Qianzhu Xu, Sunyi Wu, Jianfen Zhou, Jiashen Lu, Xingyan Fan, Nana Meng, Yuan Ding, Xudong Zheng, Weiyue Lu
    Journal of Controlled Release.2023; 354: 538.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Breast Cancer: Review of Emerging Nanotherapeutics
    Ranga Dissanayake, Rheal Towner, Marya Ahmed
    Cancers.2023; 15(11): 2906.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Nanopaclitaxel Formulation for Cancer Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials
    Xiangmin Deng, Xiaoqin Huang, Xiaoyan Dong, Genxiang Mao, Wenmin Xing
    Nanomedicine.2023; 18(10): 833.     CrossRef
  • Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer
    João P. N. Silva, Bárbara Pinto, Luís Monteiro, Patrícia M. A. Silva, Hassan Bousbaa
    Pharmaceutics.2023; 15(6): 1653.     CrossRef
  • Nano delivery system for paclitaxel: Recent advances in cancer theranostics
    Na Ying, Sisi Liu, Mengmeng Zhang, Jing Cheng, Linghuan Luo, Jiayi Jiang, Gaofan Shi, Shu Wu, Jun Ji, Haoyuan Su, Hongzhi Pan, Dongdong Zeng
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2023; 228: 113419.     CrossRef
  • Current Perspectives on Paclitaxel: Focus on Its Production, Delivery and Combination Therapy
    Yibin Liu, Fenglan Zhao, Qibao Wang, Qingjie Zhao, Guige Hou, Qingguo Meng
    Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.2023; 23(18): 1780.     CrossRef
  • Current perspectives and trends in nanoparticle drug delivery systems in breast cancer: bibliometric analysis and review
    Sheng Sun, Ye-hui Wang, Xiang Gao, He-yong Wang, Lu Zhang, Na Wang, Chun-mei Li, Shao-quan Xiong
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Paclitaxel prodrug-encapsulated polypeptide micelles with redox/pH dual responsiveness for cancer chemotherapy
    Jinyu Liu, Yanhao Zhang, Chao Liu, Yuhao Jiang, Zihao Wang, Xinsong Li
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2023; 645: 123398.     CrossRef
  • Biodegradable polyester-based nano drug delivery system in cancer chemotherapy: a review of recent progress (2021–2023)
    Zongheng Wang, Miaomiao Xiao, Fangliang Guo, Yue Yan, Hong Tian, Qianshi Zhang, Shuangyi Ren, Liqun Yang
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of triblock copolymeric micelles based on α- and ε-poly(L-lysine): a Cornelian choice
    Franck Marquet, Viorica Patrulea, Gerrit Borchard
    Polymer Journal.2022; 54(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Current understandings and clinical translation of nanomedicines for breast cancer therapy
    Yike Jiang, Ziyi Jiang, Mingzhe Wang, Lan Ma
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 180: 114034.     CrossRef
  • Poly(ϵ-Caprolactone)-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol (PCL-MPEG)-Based Micelles for Drug-Delivery: The Effect of PCL Chain Length on Blood Components, Phagocytosis, and Biodistribution
    Zemin Hou, Wencheng Zhou, Xi Guo, Rui Zhong, Ao Wang, Jiehua Li, Ying Cen, Chao You, Hong Tan, Meng Tian
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2022; Volume 17: 1613.     CrossRef
  • Engineered nanomaterials as an effective tool for HER2+ breast cancer therapy
    Prashant Pandey, Dilip Kumar Arya, Mohan Kumar Ramar, Kumarappan Chidambaram, P.S. Rajinikanth
    Drug Discovery Today.2022; 27(9): 2526.     CrossRef
  • Biophysical Characterization of Interactions between Serum Albumin and Block Copolymer Micelles
    Catherine F. Dial, Richard A. Gemeinhart
    ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.2022; 8(7): 2899.     CrossRef
  • Micelles in Cancer Therapy: An Update on Preclinical and Clinical Status
    Rabia Aqeel, Nidhi Srivastava, Poonam Kushwaha
    Recent Patents on Nanotechnology.2022; 16(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Challenging the fundamental conjectures in nanoparticle drug delivery for chemotherapy treatment of solid cancers
    Juanjuan Yang, Xiaojin Wang, Bingshun Wang, Kinam Park, Karen Wooley, Shiyi Zhang
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 190: 114525.     CrossRef
  • In Vivo Sustained Release of the Retrograde Transport Inhibitor Retro-2.1 Formulated in a Thermosensitive Hydrogel
    Robin Vinck, Laetitia Anvi Nguyen, Mathilde Munier, Lucie Caramelle, Diana Karpman, Julien Barbier, Alain Pruvost, Jean-Christophe Cintrat, Daniel Gillet
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(23): 14611.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Translation of Self‐Assembled Cancer Nanomedicines
    Peng Mi, Kanjiro Miyata, Kazunori Kataoka, Horacio Cabral
    Advanced Therapeutics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From Conventional to Precision Therapy in Canine Mammary Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Guillermo Valdivia, Ángela Alonso-Diez, Dolores Pérez-Alenza, Laura Peña
    Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced Biotechnologies: Collections of Plant Cell Cultures As a Basis for Development and Production of Medicinal Preparations
    E. V. Popova, A. V. Nosov, M. V. Titova, D. V. Kochkin, A. A. Fomenkov, I. E. Kulichenko, A. M. Nosov
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.2021; 68(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation
    Xin Luan, Hebao Yuan, Yudong Song, Hongxiang Hu, Bo Wen, Miao He, Huixia Zhang, Yan Li, Feng Li, Pan Shu, Joseph P. Burnett, Nathan Truchan, Maria Palmisano, Manjunath P. Pai, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao, Duxin Sun
    Biomaterials.2021; 275: 120910.     CrossRef
  • Breast cancer: Muscarinic receptors as new targets for tumor therapy
    Alejandro Español, Agustina Salem, Yamila Sanchez, María Elena Sales
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 12(6): 404.     CrossRef
  • Direct Comparison of Analogous Amphiphilic Gradient and Block Polyoxazolines
    Lenka Loukotová, Pavel Švec, Ondřej Groborz, Tomáš Heizer, Hynek Beneš, Helena Raabová, Tereza Bělinová, Vít Herynek, Martin Hrubý
    Macromolecules.2021; 54(17): 8182.     CrossRef
  • Challenges towards Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Nanomedicines
    Muhammad Nadeem Hafeez, Christian Celia, Vilma Petrikaite
    Processes.2021; 9(9): 1527.     CrossRef
  • Drug Delivery of Natural Products Through Nanocarriers for Effective Breast Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Literature
    Kah Min Yap, Mahendran Sekar, Shivkanya Fuloria, Yuan Seng Wu, Siew Hua Gan, Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, Chandrakant Kokare, Pei Teng Lum, M Yasmin Begum, Shankar Mani, Dhanalekshmi Unnikrishnan Meenakshi, Kathiresan V Sathasiva
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2021; Volume 16: 7891.     CrossRef
  • Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study)
    Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Hong Seo, Jin-Hee Ahn, Tae-Yong Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Joohyuk Sohn, Yaewon Yang, Kyong Hwa Park, Yong Wha Moon, Seungtaek Lim, Myoung Joo Kang, Koung Eun Yoon, Hyun Ju Cho, Keun Seok Lee
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Self-assembly of oxidation-responsive polyethylene glycol-paclitaxel prodrug for cancer chemotherapy
    Chengyuan Dong, Quan Zhou, Jiajia Xiang, Fusheng Liu, Zhuxian Zhou, Youqing Shen
    Journal of Controlled Release.2020; 321: 529.     CrossRef
  • Clinical applications of nanomedicine in cancer therapy
    Mohammad Norouzi, Mehrnaz Amerian, Mahshid Amerian, Fatemeh Atyabi
    Drug Discovery Today.2020; 25(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • Improvement of Paclitaxel-Associated Adverse Reactions (ADRs) via the Use of Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis


    Pi-Ling Chou, Ya-Ping Huang, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kun-Ming Rau, Yi-Ping Fang
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 1731.     CrossRef
  • Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Adam S. Komorowski, Helen J. MacKay, Rossanna C. Pezo
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(14): 5035.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges
    Saeid Kargozar, Francesco Baino, Sepideh Hamzehlou, Michael R. Hamblin, Masoud Mozafari
    Chemical Society Reviews.2020; 49(14): 5008.     CrossRef
  • Furry nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization of nanoemulsion-mediated core crosslinked nanoparticles and their robust stability in vivo
    Rena Tanaka, Koichi Arai, Jun Matsuno, Miyo Soejima, Ji Ha Lee, Rintaro Takahashi, Kazuo Sakurai, Shota Fujii
    Polymer Chemistry.2020; 11(27): 4408.     CrossRef
  • Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval
    Duhyeong Hwang, Jacob D. Ramsey, Alexander V. Kabanov
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2020; 156: 80.     CrossRef
  • What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right
    Duxin Sun, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao
    ACS Nano.2020; 14(10): 12281.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis of PCL–PEG–PCL Triblock Copolymer via Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization and Its Application as an Injectable Hydrogel—An Interdisciplinary Learning Trial
    Kaiting Wu, Lin Yu, Jiandong Ding
    Journal of Chemical Education.2020; 97(11): 4158.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical-Based Nanomedicine for Advanced Cancer Theranostics: Perspectives on Clinical Trials to Clinical Use


    Madhusmita Dhupal, Devasish Chowdhury
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 9125.     CrossRef
  • A Compressive Review about Taxol®: History and Future Challenges
    Julia Gallego-Jara, Gema Lozano-Terol, Rosa Alba Sola-Martínez, Manuel Cánovas-Díaz, Teresa de Diego Puente
    Molecules.2020; 25(24): 5986.     CrossRef
  • Recent Clinical Developments of Nanomediated Drug Delivery Systems of Taxanes for the Treatment of Cancer
    Ruben AG van Eerden, Ron HJ Mathijssen, Stijn LW Koolen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 8151.     CrossRef
  • Basic principles of drug delivery systems – the case of paclitaxel
    S. Ezrahi, A. Aserin, N. Garti
    Advances in Colloid and Interface Science.2019; 263: 95.     CrossRef
  • Biomolecules Turn Self-Assembling Amphiphilic Block Co-polymer Platforms Into Biomimetic Interfaces
    Saziye Yorulmaz Avsar, Myrto Kyropoulou, Stefano Di Leone, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Wolfgang P. Meier, Cornelia G. Palivan
    Frontiers in Chemistry.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polyester Nanoparticle Encapsulation Mitigates Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    R. Ganugula, M. Deng, M. Arora, H.-L. Pan, M. N. V. Ravi Kumar
    ACS Chemical Neuroscience.2019; 10(3): 1801.     CrossRef
  • PEGylation of Ginsenoside Rg3-Entrapped Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization, and In Vitro Biological Studies
    Lijun Zhang, Junfeng Hui, Pei Ma, Yu Mi, Daidi Fan, Chenhui Zhu, Lei Chi, Yanan Dong
    Journal of Nanomaterials.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy by formulation approach
    Xiaowei Zang, Jong Bong Lee, Kiran Deshpande, Olga B. Garbuzenko, Tamara Minko, Leonid Kagan
    Journal of Controlled Release.2019; 303: 109.     CrossRef
  • Current status of nanomedicine in the chemotherapy of breast cancer
    A. I. Fraguas-Sánchez, C. Martín-Sabroso, A. Fernández-Carballido, A. I. Torres-Suárez
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2019; 84(4): 689.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Genexol-PM and Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bhumsuk Keam, Keun-Wook Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Keun-Yong Eom, Suzy Kim, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Seong Keun Kwon, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung, Ji-Won Kim, Dae Seog Heo
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • Advances in thermosensitive polymer-grafted platforms for biomedical applications
    Phung Ngan Le, Chan Khon Huynh, Ngoc Quyen Tran
    Materials Science and Engineering: C.2018; 92: 1016.     CrossRef
  • Supramolecular polymeric chemotherapy based on cucurbit[7]uril-PEG copolymer
    Hao Chen, Yueyue Chen, Han Wu, Jiang-Fei Xu, Zhiwei Sun, Xi Zhang
    Biomaterials.2018; 178: 697.     CrossRef
  • pH/NIR-Responsive Polypyrrole-Functionalized Fibrous Localized Drug-Delivery Platform for Synergistic Cancer Therapy
    Arjun Prasad Tiwari, Tae In Hwang, Jung-Mi Oh, Bikendra Maharjan, Sungkun Chun, Beom Su Kim, Mahesh Kumar Joshi, Chan Hee Park, Cheol Sang Kim
    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2018; 10(24): 20256.     CrossRef
  • The Blood Clearance Kinetics and Pathway of Polymeric Micelles in Cancer Drug Delivery
    Xuanrong Sun, Guowei Wang, Hao Zhang, Shiqi Hu, Xin Liu, Jianbin Tang, Youqing Shen
    ACS Nano.2018; 12(6): 6179.     CrossRef
  • Different Nanoformulations Alter the Tissue Distribution of Paclitaxel, Which Aligns with Reported Distinct Efficacy and Safety Profiles
    Feng Li, Huixia Zhang, Miao He, Jinhui Liao, Nianhang Chen, Yan Li, Simon Zhou, Maria Palmisano, Alex Yu, Manjunath P. Pai, Hebao Yuan, Duxin Sun
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2018; 15(10): 4505.     CrossRef
  • Emerging advances in P-glycoprotein inhibitory nanomaterials for drug delivery
    Longfa Kou, Rui Sun, Yangzom D. Bhutia, Qing Yao, Ruijie Chen
    Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery.2018; 15(9): 869.     CrossRef
  • The battle of “nano” paclitaxel
    Alexandros Marios Sofias, Michael Dunne, Gert Storm, Christine Allen
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overcoming the Road Blocks: Advancement of Block Copolymer Micelles for Cancer Therapy in the Clinic
    Loujin Houdaihed, James C. Evans, Christine Allen
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2017; 14(8): 2503.     CrossRef
  • PEG-PCL-based nanomedicines: A biodegradable drug delivery system and its application
    Philip Grossen, Dominik Witzigmann, Sandro Sieber, Jörg Huwyler
    Journal of Controlled Release.2017; 260: 46.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thermoresponsive Poly(L-lactic acid)–poly(ethylene glycol) Gel Injection on Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Rat Myocardial Infarction Model
    Shota Somekawa, Atsushi Mahara, Kazunari Masutani, Yoshiharu Kimura, Hiroshi Urakawa, Tetsuji Yamaoka
    Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.2017; 14(5): 507.     CrossRef
  • A versatile nanoplatform for synergistic combination therapy to treat human esophageal cancer
    Xin-shuai Wang, De-jiu Kong, Tzu-yin Lin, Xiao-cen Li, Yoshihiro Izumiya, Xue-zhen Ding, Li Zhang, Xiao-chen Hu, Jun-qiang Yang, She-gan Gao, Kit S Lam, Yuan-pei Li
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.2017; 38(6): 931.     CrossRef
  • 17,534 View
  • 637 Download
  • 73 Web of Science
  • 67 Crossref
Close layer
Circulating Plasma Biomarkers for TSU-68, an Oral Antiangiogenic Agent, in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
Changhoon Yoo, Sung-Bae Kim, Jungsil Ro, Seock-Ah Im, Young-Hyuck Im, Jee Hyun Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Hong Suk Song, Seok Yun Kang, Hee Sook Park, Hyun-Cheol Chung
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):499-507.   Published online July 14, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.089
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study analyzed the role of plasma biomarkers for TSU-68 in a previous phase II trial comparing TSU-68 plus docetaxel and docetaxel alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
A total of 77 patients were eligible for this study (38 in the TSU-68 plus docetaxel arm and 39 in the docetaxel alone arm). Blood samples were collected prior to the start of each cycle, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)- AA, -AB, -BB, fibroblast growth factor, M30, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were measured using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
In patients with baseline PDGF-AA ≥ median, median PFS was significantly worse in the TSU-68 plus docetaxel group than in the docetaxel alone group (5.4 months vs. 13.7 months, p=0.049), while a trend toward a PFS benefit was observed in those with baseline PDGF-AA < median (9.7 months vs. 4.0 months, p=0.18; p for interaction=0.03). In the TSU-68 plus docetaxel group, PFS showed significant association with fold changes in CRP (p=0.001), IL-6 (p < .001), PDGF-BB (p=0.02), and VEGF (p=0.047) following the first treatment cycle.
Conclusion
Baseline PDGF-AA levels and dynamics of VEGF, PDGF-BB, CRP, and IL-6 levels were predictive for the efficacy of TSU-68.
  • 11,643 View
  • 112 Download
Close layer
Metachronous Double Primary Cancer after Treatment of Breast Cancer
Jin Young Kim, Hong Suk Song
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(1):64-71.   Published online October 27, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.215
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The pattern of double primary cancer after treatment for breast cancer is important for patient survival.
Materials and Methods
We analyzed 108 cases of metachronous double primary cancer in breast cancer patients treated from 1999 to 2012.
Results
Metachronous double primary cancers occurred in 108 of 2,657 patients (4.1%) with breast cancer. The median time to the occurrence of second cancer after diagnosis of the first was 58.4±41.2 months (range, 6.9 to 180.2 months). The most common cancer was thyroid cancer, which occurred in 45 patients (41.7%). This was followed by gastric cancer in 16 patients (14.8%), endometrial cancer in 10 patients (9.3%), and cervical cancer in seven patients (6.5%). The relative risk showed a significant increase in endometrial (4.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66 to 13.79), gastric (2.61; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.06), and thyroid cancer (1.95; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.79). At 5 years after diagnosis of breast cancer, secondary cancer occurred in 48 patients (44.4%), with 50.0% of the endometrial, 56.3% of the stomach, and 37.8% of the thyroid cancer cases being diagnosed after 5 years. Median survival after diagnosis of the second cancer was 123.9±11.2 months. The prognosis was mainly influenced by the anatomic site.
Conclusion
The incidence of endometrial, stomach, and thyroid cancer increased significantly after treatment with primary breast cancer, and survival was dependent on early detection and the type of second primary cancer. A prolonged follow-up examination for metachronous double primary cancer is needed to provide early detection and improve survival time in patients with breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Deciphering the Patterns of Dual Primary Cases Registered at the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry: First Experience from Rural Cancer Center in North India
    Sankalp Sancheti, Alok Kumar Goel, Anshul Singla, Kuldeep Singh Chauhan, Kiran Arora, Debashish Chaudhary, Tapas Dora, Shweta Tahlan, Prithviraj Kadam, Prachi Joshi, Akash Sali, Rahatdeep Singh Brar, Atul Budukh, Ashish Gulia, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia,
    Journal of Laboratory Physicians.2023; 15(04): 524.     CrossRef
  • Multiple synchronous primary malignant neoplasms: A case report and literature review
    Linlin Hao, Lihui Zhang, Chuanjie Xu, Min Jiang, Geyi Zhu, Jie Guo
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between Thyroid Cancer and Breast Cancer: Two Longitudinal Follow-Up Studies Using a National Health Screening Cohort
    Young Ju Jin, Mi Jung Kwon, Ji Hee Kim, Joo-Hee Kim, Hyo Geun Choi
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous gastric cancer and breast cancer metastases to the stomach with lymph node collision tumor: a case report
    Takeshi Okamoto, Hidekazu Suzuki, Katsuyuki Fukuda
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pioneering BRCA1/2 Point-Of-Care Testing for Integration of Germline and Tumor Genetics in Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Vision for the Future of Translational Pharmacogenomics
    Lwando Mampunye, Nerina C. van der Merwe, Kathleen A. Grant, Armand V. Peeters, Rispah Torrorey-Sawe, David J. French, Kelebogile E. Moremi, Martin Kidd, Petrus C. van Eeden, Fredrieka M. Pienaar, Maritha J. Kotze
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Pattern of Second Primary Tumours in Postmenopausal Women with Prior Breast Cancer in Western Romania: A Retrospective, Single-Institution Study
    Cristina Marinela Oprean, Larisa Maria Badau, Robert-Alexandru Han, Teodora Hoinoiu, Gabriel-Mugur Dragomir, Daciana Grujic, Tiberiu Dragomir, Alis Dema
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 1957.     CrossRef
  • High Incidence and Prevalence of Papillary Thyroid Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
    Jung Ho Park, Sanghwa Kim, Lee Su Kim
    Journal of Endocrine Surgery.2020; 20(4): 88.     CrossRef
  • Gastric Complications after Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Won Kyung Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Seonwoo Kim, Myung-Hee Shin, Hyejung Cha
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2019; 22(3): 464.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis Associated with Multiple Primary Cancers in Breast Cancer Patients
    Bong Kyun Kim, Se Jeong Oh, Jeong-Yoon Song, Han-Byoel Lee, Min Ho Park, Yongsik Jung, Woo-Chan Park, Jina Lee, Woo Young Sun
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2018; 21(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • Detection of the early phase of esophageal cancer progression into lamina propria mucosae by the serum p53 antibody
    Fumi Saito, Hideaki Shimada, Hideaki Ogata, Takafumi Otsuka, Tetsuo Nemoto, Kazutoshi Shibuya, Hironori Kaneko
    Esophagus.2017; 14(4): 366.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous double primary cancer of epithelial and mesenchymal origins
    Hongzeng Wu, Ze Li, Helin Feng, Jinming Zhang
    Medicine.2017; 96(49): e9036.     CrossRef
  • Development of second primary cancer in Korean breast cancer survivors
    Hong Kyu Jung, Suyeon Park, Nam Won Kim, Jong Eun Lee, Zisun Kim, Sun Wook Han, Sung Mo Hur, Sung Young Kim, Cheol Wan Lim, Min Hyuk Lee, Jihyoun Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2017; 93(6): 287.     CrossRef
  • Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review
    Alexia Vogt, Sabine Schmid, Karl Heinimann, Harald Frick, Christian Herrmann, Thomas Cerny, Aurelius Omlin
    ESMO Open.2017; 2(2): e000172.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and survival of patients with metachronous or synchronous double primary malignancies: breast and thyroid cancer
    Li Zhang, Yansheng Wu, Fangfang Liu, Li Fu, Zhongsheng Tong
    Oncotarget.2016; 7(32): 52450.     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy did not increase thyroid cancer risk among women with breast cancer: A nationwide population‐based cohort study
    Li‐Min Sun, Cheng‐Li Lin, Ji‐An Liang, Wen‐Sheng Huang, Chia‐Hung Kao
    International Journal of Cancer.2015; 137(12): 2896.     CrossRef
  • A Possible Association Between Thyroid Cancer and Breast Cancer
    Jee Hyun An, Yul Hwangbo, Hwa Young Ahn, Bhumsuk Keam, Kyu Eun Lee, Wonshik Han, Do Joon Park, In Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh, Yeo-Kyu Youn, Bo Youn Cho, Seock-Ah Im, Young Joo Park
    Thyroid.2015; 25(12): 1330.     CrossRef
  • 14,361 View
  • 120 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
A Randomized Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Azasetron versus Ondansetron to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Prevention of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Chemotherapy
Hee Yeon Lee, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong-Seog Kim, Hong Suk Song, Sung Hyun Yang, Joon Hee Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Jong Gwang Kim, Sang-We Kim, Dong-Wan Kim, Si-Young Kim, Hee Sook Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(1):19-26.   Published online January 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.1.19
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azasetron compared to ondansetron in the prevention of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was a multi-center, prospective, randomized, double-dummy, double-blind and parallel-group trial involving 12 institutions in Korea between May 2005 and December 2005. A total of 265 patients with moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy were included and randomly assigned to either the azasetron or ondansetron group. All patients received azasetron (10 mg intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg intravenously) on day 1 and dexamethasone (4 mg orally every 12 hours) on days 2-4. The azasetron group received azasetron (10 mg orally) with placebo of ondansetron (orally every 12 hours), and the ondansetron group received ondansetron (8 mg orally every 12 hours) with placebo of azasetron (orally) on days 2-6.
RESULTS
Over days 2-6, the effective ratio of complete response in the azasetron and ondansetron groups was 45% and 54.5%, respectively (95% confidence interval, -21.4 to 2.5%). Thus, the non-inferiority of azasetron compared with ondansetron in delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting was not proven in the present study. All treatments were well tolerated and no unexpected drug-related adverse events were reported. The most common adverse events related to the treatment were constipation and hiccups, and there were no differences in the overall incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSION
In the present study, azasetron showed inferiority in the control of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting compared with ondansetron whereas safety profiles were similar between the two groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on the antiemetic response to ondansetron-based medication for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in South Indian cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital
    Ayyar Porkodi, Deepak Gopal Shewade, Goud Alladi Charanraj
    Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences.2023; 36(3): 129.     CrossRef
  • Hiccups in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Mevlüde Ergen, Fatma Arikan, Rüya Fırat Çetin
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2021; 62(3): e85.     CrossRef
  • A Fast and Validated HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Analysis of Five 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists via the Quantitative Analysis of Multicomponents by a Single Marker
    Fuchao Chen, Baoxia Fang, Peng Li, Sicen Wang, Amr M. Mahmoud
    International Journal of Analytical Chemistry.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis
    Vanessa Piechotta, Anne Adams, Madhuri Haque, Benjamin Scheckel, Nina Kreuzberger, Ina Monsef, Karin Jordan, Kathrin Kuhr, Nicole Skoetz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Steroid Rotation in a Japanese Patient with Hiccups Caused by Dexamethasone: a Case Report
    Hiroki Hosokawa, Hideaki Shimoda, Takayuki Ishii
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI.2019; 139(4): 647.     CrossRef
  • Stability of azasetron-dexamethasone mixture for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting administration
    Bao-Xia Fang, Fu-Chao Chen, Dan Zhu, Jun Guo, Lin-Hai Wang
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(63): 106249.     CrossRef
  • Gender Differences in Hiccup Patients: Analysis of Published Case Reports and Case-Control Studies
    Gyeong-Won Lee, Rock Bum Kim, Se Il Go, Hyun Seop Cho, Seung Jun Lee, David Hui, Eduardo Bruera, Jung Hun Kang
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2016; 51(2): 278.     CrossRef
  • Cheaper Options in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
    Bishal Gyawali, Bishesh Sharma Poudyal, Mahesh Iddawela
    Journal of Global Oncology.2016; 2(3): 145.     CrossRef
  • Recent developments in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a comprehensive review
    K. Jordan, F. Jahn, M. Aapro
    Annals of Oncology.2015; 26(6): 1081.     CrossRef
  • 12,017 View
  • 66 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Outcome of Rituximab-Based Therapy (RCHOP) in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients with Bone Marrow Involvement
Byung Woog Kang, Joon Ho Moon, Yee Soo Chae, Soo Jung Lee, Jong Gwang Kim, Yeo-Kyeoung Kim, Je-Jung Lee, Deok-Hwan Yang, Hyeoung-Joon Kim, Jin Young Kim, Young Rok Do, Keon Uk Park, Hong Suk Song, Ki Young Kwon, Min Kyung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sung Hwa Bae, Hwak Kim, Sang Kyun Sohn
Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45(2):112-117.   Published online June 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.45.2.112
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
We investigated the clinical outcome of bone marrow (BM) involvement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received rituximab-based therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 567 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with rituximab-CHOP (RCHOP) between November 2001 and March 2010 were included in the current study. All of the patients underwent a BM study at the initial staging and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of these patients with or without BM involvement were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS
The total cohort included 567 patients. The overall incidence of BM involvement was 8.5%. With a median follow-up duration of 33.2 months (range, 0.1 to 80.7 months) for patients who were alive at the last follow-up, the five-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rate in patients without BM involvement (76.3% and 67.5%, p<0.001) was statistically higher than that in patients with BM involvement (44.3% and 40.1%, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, among total patients, BM involvement showed a significant association with OS and EFS. In univariate and multivariate analyses, even among stage IV patients, a significant association with worse EFS was observed in the BM involvement group.
CONCLUSION
BM involvement at diagnosis affected the survival of patients with DLBCL who received RCHOP. Although use of RCHOP can result in significant improvement of the therapeutic effect of DLBCL, BM involvement is still a negative prognostic factor of DLBCL patients in the era of rituximab.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Combination of Bone Marrow Biopsy and Flow Cytometric Analysis: The Prognostically Relevant Central Approach for Detecting Bone Marrow Invasion in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
    Haruya Okamoto, Nobuhiko Uoshima, Ayako Muramatsu, Reiko Isa, Takahiro Fujino, Yayoi Matsumura-Kimoto, Taku Tsukamoto, Shinsuke Mizutani, Yuji Shimura, Tsutomu Kobayashi, Eri Kawata, Hitoji Uchiyama, Junya Kuroda
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(9): 1724.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of CD52 expression in "double-hit" and "double-expressor" lymphomas: Implications for clinical trial eligibility
    Jeffrey W. Craig, Michael J. Mina, Jennifer L. Crombie, Ann S. LaCasce, David M. Weinstock, Geraldine S. Pinkus, Olga Pozdnyakova, Francesco Bertolini
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(7): e0199708.     CrossRef
  • HIV-infection impact on clinical–biological features and outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP in the combination antiretroviral therapy era
    Maria Joao Baptista, Olga Garcia, Mireia Morgades, Eva Gonzalez-Barca, Pilar Miralles, Armando Lopez-Guillermo, Eugenia Abella, Miriam Moreno, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Evarist Feliu, Josep-Maria Ribera, Jose-Tomas Navarro
    AIDS.2015; 29(7): 811.     CrossRef
  • Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Impact of Rituximab on Overall Survival of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell and Follicular Lymphoma
    José Carlos Jaime-Pérez, Carmen Magdalena Gamboa-Alonso, Alberto Vázquez-Mellado de Larracoechea, Marisol Rodríguez-Martínez, César Homero Gutiérrez-Aguirre, Luis Javier Marfil-Rivera, David Gómez-Almaguer
    Archives of Medical Research.2015; 46(6): 454.     CrossRef
  • 24,980 View
  • 63 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Metachronous Double Primary Cancer after Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
Jin Young Kim, Won Young Jang, Mi Hwa Heo, Kang Kuk Lee, Young Rok Do, Keon Uk Park, Hong Suk Song, Yoon Nyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2012;44(3):173-178.   Published online September 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2012.44.3.173
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
The pattern of double primary cancers after treatment for gastric cancer is important for a patient's survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed the clinicopathologic data of 214 gastric cancer patients from October 1996 to November 2007 with regard to metachronous second primary cancers.
RESULTS
Out of 5,778 patients with gastric cancer, metachronous second primary cancers occurred in 214 patients. The median age was 61.8 years, the number of male and female patients was 140 (65.4%), 74 (34.6%), respectively. The median time to the occurrence of second cancers after diagnosis of the first was 39.2 months (standard deviation, 31.2 months). The most common cancer was colorectal cancer, which occurred in 44 patients (20.6%), and lung cancer in 33 patients (15.4%), hepatocellular carcinoma in 26 patients (12.1%), ovarian cancer in 15 patients (7.0%), cervical cancer in 12 patients (7.0%), breast cancer in 11 patients (5.1%), and esophageal cancer in 11 patients (5.1%). The observed/expected (O/E) ratio showed a significant increase in colorectal (1.25), male biliary (1.60), ovarian (8.72), and cervical cancer (3.33) with primary gastric cancer. After five years from diagnosis of gastric cancer, secondary cancer occurred in 50 patients (23.4%), and breast cancer, prostate cancer, laryngeal cancer, lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma were the most frequent.
CONCLUSION
The O/E ratio showed a significant increase in colorectal, male biliary, ovarian, and cervical cancer with primary gastric cancer, and second primary cancer as the main cause of death for these patients. A follow-up examination for metachronous double primary cancer is needed in order to improve the survival time in patients with gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Gastric Metastasis Mimicking Early Gastric Cancer from Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Case Report and Literature Review
    Kwon Cheol Yoo, Dae Hoon Kim, Sungmin Park, HyoYung Yun, Dong Hee Ryu, Jisun Lee, Seung-Myoung Son
    Medicina.2024; 60(6): 980.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous gastric and ovarian cancer successfully treated with FOLFOX therapy: a case report and review of the literature
    Makiko So, Aya Shimoji, Yoko Iemura, Ai Suizu, Shuichiro Iwami, Masahito Hoki, Shinsuke Shibuya
    International Cancer Conference Journal.2024; 13(4): 427.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and pattern of second primary cancer in patients diagnosed with primary cancer
    Jong Sung, Ae Ahn, Ho Park, Kyu Jang, Woo Moon, Ju-Hyung Lee, Kyoung Kim, Myoung Chung
    Oncology Letters.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The risk and distribution of second primary cancers according to subsite of primary stomach cancer: a retrospective cohort population-based study
    Ali Hemade, Souheil Hallit
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(12): 6944.     CrossRef
  • Features of synchronous and metachronous dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer
    Yi-Jia Lin, Hua-Xian Chen, Feng-Xiang Zhang, Xian-Sheng Hu, Hai-Juan Huang, Jian-Hua Lu, Ye-Zi Cheng, Jun-Sheng Peng, Lei Lian
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2023; 15(11): 1864.     CrossRef
  • Secondary Primary Cancer after Primary Gastric Cancer: Literature Review and Big Data Analysis Using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) Database of Republic of Korea
    Jeong Ho Song, Yeonkyoung Lee, Jaesung Heo, Sang-Yong Son, Hoon Hur, Sang-Uk Han
    Cancers.2022; 14(24): 6165.     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous gastric cancer and breast cancer metastases to the stomach with lymph node collision tumor: a case report
    Takeshi Okamoto, Hidekazu Suzuki, Katsuyuki Fukuda
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The contribution of second primary cancers to the mortality of patients with a gastric first primary cancer
    Samantha Morais, Luís Antunes, Maria J. Bento, Nuno Lunet
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2019; 31(4): 471.     CrossRef
  • Second Primary Cancer after Treating Gastrointestinal Cancer
    Jeong Youp Park
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 74(4): 193.     CrossRef
  • Gastric cancer and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Alex Emmanuel Elobu, Ashok Thorat, Vianney Kweyamba, Rakesh Rai
    Formosan Journal of Surgery.2019; 52(3): 107.     CrossRef
  • Occurrence of metachronous multiple primary cancers occurred in different parts of the stomach with 2 pathologic features
    Yan Song, Ningning Zhao, Kui Jiang, Zhongqing Zheng, Bangmao Wang, Dalu Kong, Shu Li
    Medicine.2018; 97(20): e10803.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Strategy and Outcome in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Gastric Resection: A Three‐Center Experience with 39 Patients
    Dooin Lee, Jae Hoon Lee, Dongho Choi, Chang Moo Kang, Jae Uk Chong, Song‐Chul Kim, Kyeong Geun Lee
    World Journal of Surgery.2017; 41(2): 552.     CrossRef
  • Risk of second primary cancers among patients with a first primary gastric cancer: A population-based study in North Portugal
    Samantha Morais, Luís Antunes, Maria José Bento, Nuno Lunet
    Cancer Epidemiology.2017; 50: 85.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of Gastric Cancer in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer
    Ji-Hyun Seo, Hyun-Jin Kim, Jung Je Park, Ok-Jae Lee, Jin Pyeong Kim, Seong-Ki Ahn, Jeong Seok Hwa, Jong Sil Lee, Hee-Shang Youn
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2017; 17(4): 190.     CrossRef
  • Second primary malignancy risk among patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan
    San-Chi Chen, Chia-Jen Liu, Yu-Wen Hu, Chiu-Mei Yeh, Li-Yu Hu, Yen-Po Wang, Yi-Ping Hung, Cheng-Hwai Tzeng, Tzeon-Jye Chiou, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Chung-Jen Teng
    Gastric Cancer.2016; 19(2): 490.     CrossRef
  • Secondary Primary Malignancy Risk in Patients With Ovarian Cancer in Taiwan
    Yi-Ping Hung, Chia-Jen Liu, Yu-Wen Hu, Min-Huang Chen, Chun-Pin Li, Chiu-Mei Yeh, Tzeon-Jye Chiou, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Muh-Hwa Yang, Yee Chao
    Medicine.2015; 94(38): e1626.     CrossRef
  • Role of Ki‐67 Proliferation Index in the Assessment of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasias Regarding the Stage of Disease
    H. C. Miller, P. Drymousis, R. Flora, R. Goldin, D. Spalding, A. Frilling
    World Journal of Surgery.2014; 38(6): 1353.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of metachronous multiple primary cancers following the curative resection of gastric cancer
    Chan Kim, Hong Jae Chon, Beodeul Kang, Kiyeol Kim, Hei-Cheul Jeung, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sung Hoon Noh, Sun Young Rha
    BMC Cancer.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 11,741 View
  • 89 Download
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Heptaplatin 1-hour Infusion and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy Comparing with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Hyung Min Jin, Jinmo Yang, Hong Suk Song, Young Rok Do, Hun Mo Ryoo, Joo Seop Chung, Dae Young Zang, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jong Youl Jin, Chang Yeol Yim, Hee Sook Park, Jun Suk Kim, Chang Hak Sohn, Soon Nam Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41(1):12-18.   Published online March 31, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2009.41.1.12
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

Heptaplatin (Sunpla) is a cisplatin derivative. A phase IIb trial using heptaplatin resulted in a 34% response rate with mild nephrotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase III trial of heptaplatin plus 5-FU compared with cisplatin plus 5-FU in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

One hundred seventy-four patients (heptaplatin, n=88; cisplatin, n=86) from 13 centers were enrolled. The eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with pathologically-proven adenocarcinoma, chemonaive patients, or patients who had received only single adjuvant chemotherapy, and who had a measurable or evaluable lesion. On day 1, heptaplatin (400 mg/m2) or cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given over 1 hour with 5-FU (1 gm/m2) on days 1~5 every 4 weeks.

Results

At the time of survival analysis, the median overall survival was 7.3 months in the 5-FU + heptaplatin (FH) arm and 7.9 months in the 5-FU + cisplatin (FP) arm (p=0.24). Of the FH patients, 34.2% (complete response [CR], 1.3%; partial response [PR], 32.9%) experienced a confirmed objective response compared with 35.9% (CR 0%, PR 35.9%) of FP patients (p=0.78). The median-time-to-progression was 2.5 months in the FH arm and 2.3 months in the FP arm. The incidence of neutropenia was higher with FP (28%) than with FH (16%; p=0.06); grade 3~4 nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the FP than in the FH arm (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). The incidence of increased proteinuria and creatininemia was higher with FH than with FP; however, there was no statistical difference. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Heptaplatin showed similar effects to cisplatin when combined with 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer patients with tolerable toxicities.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group
    Bum Jun Kim, Chi Hoon Maeng, Bhumsuk Keam, Young-Hyuck Im, Jungsil Ro, Kyung Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Tae Won Kim, Jae Lyun Lee, Dae Seog Heo, Sang-We Kim, Keunchil Park, Myung-Ju Ahn, Byoung Chul Cho, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang, Jae Yong Cho, Hwan Jung Yu
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Quantum mechanical approaches and molecular docking analysis of platinum metal-based anticancer drugs Lobaplatin and Heptaplatin targeting cancer DNA - a comparative analysis
    Madhavi Sahadevan, Mullainathan Sundaram, Karunagaran Subramanian
    Chemical Physics Letters.2024; 842: 141191.     CrossRef
  • Cisplatin Resistance in Cancer Therapy: Causes and Overcoming Strategies
    S. Shruthi, K. Bhasker Shenoy
    ChemistrySelect.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances on Pt-Based Compounds for Theranostic Applications
    Giulia Ferrari, Ines Lopez-Martinez, Thomas Wanek, Claudia Kuntner, Diego Montagner
    Molecules.2024; 29(15): 3453.     CrossRef
  • Hallmarks of anticancer and antimicrobial activities of corroles
    Vinay K. Sharma, Yehuda G. Assaraf, Zeev Gross
    Drug Resistance Updates.2023; : 100931.     CrossRef
  • Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases
    Dobrina Tsvetkova, Stefka Ivanova
    Molecules.2022; 27(8): 2466.     CrossRef
  • Second and third-row transition metal compounds containing benzimidazole ligands: An overview of their anticancer and antitumour activity
    Galdina V. Suárez-Moreno, Delia Hernández-Romero, Óscar García-Barradas, Óscar Vázquez-Vera, Sharon Rosete-Luna, Carlos A. Cruz-Cruz, Aracely López-Monteon, Jesús Carrillo-Ahumada, David Morales-Morales, Raúl Colorado-Peralta
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2022; 472: 214790.     CrossRef
  • Metalofármacos en la terapia contra el cáncer
    Elizabeth Márquez López, Esmeralda Sánchez Pavón, Rodolfo Peña Rodríguez, Delia Hernández Romero, José M. Rivera Villanueva, Raúl Colorado Peralta, David Morales Morales
    TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua.2022; 16(3): e1010.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(IV) anticancer agents; are we en route to the holy grail or to a dead end?
    Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2021; 217: 111353.     CrossRef
  • Monofunctional Platinum(II) Anticancer Agents
    Suxing Jin, Yan Guo, Zijian Guo, Xiaoyong Wang
    Pharmaceuticals.2021; 14(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Pt(IV) Prodrugs with NSAIDs as Axial Ligands
    Daniil Spector, Olga Krasnovskaya, Kirill Pavlov, Alexander Erofeev, Peter Gorelkin, Elena Beloglazkina, Alexander Majouga
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(8): 3817.     CrossRef
  • Multi-action Pt(IV) anticancer agents; do we understand how they work?
    Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2019; 191: 77.     CrossRef
  • TOXview: a novel graphical presentation of cancer treatment toxicity profiles
    Lok Lam Ngai, Emil ter Veer, Héctor G. van den Boorn, E. Hugo van Herk, Jessy Joy van Kleef, Martijn G. H. van Oijen, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
    Acta Oncologica.2019; 58(8): 1138.     CrossRef
  • Photoactivated platinum-based anticancer drugs
    Muhammad Imran, Wagma Ayub, Ian S. Butler, Zia-ur-Rehman
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2018; 376: 405.     CrossRef
  • Survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sakura Iizumi, Atsuo Takashima, Kentaro Sakamaki, Satoshi Morita, Narikazu Boku
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2018; 81(6): 981.     CrossRef
  • An Analytics Approach to Designing Combination Chemotherapy Regimens for Cancer
    Dimitris Bertsimas, Allison O’Hair, Stephen Relyea, John Silberholz
    Management Science.2016; 62(5): 1511.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(iv) anticancer prodrugs – hypotheses and facts
    Dan Gibson
    Dalton Transactions.2016; 45(33): 12983.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(II) carboxylato complexes containing 7-azaindoles as N-donor carrier ligands showed cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines
    Pavel Štarha, Zdeněk Trávníček, Lucia Pazderová, Zdeněk Dvořák
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2016; 162: 109.     CrossRef
  • VEGF- and VEGFR2-Targeted Liposomes for Cisplatin Delivery to Glioma Cells
    Sergey A. Shein, Ilya I. Kuznetsov, Tatiana O. Abakumova, Pavel S. Chelushkin, Pavel A. Melnikov, Anna A. Korchagina, Dmitry A. Bychkov, Irina F. Seregina, Mikhail A. Bolshov, Alexander V. Kabanov, Vladimir P. Chekhonin, Natalia V. Nukolova
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2016; 13(11): 3712.     CrossRef
  • Condensations of single DNA molecules induced by heptaplatin and its chiral isomer
    Hong-Yan Zhang, Yu-Ru Liu, Wei Li, Hui Li, Shuo-Xing Dou, Ping Xie, Wei-Chi Wang, Peng-Ye Wang
    AIP Advances.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanocarriers for delivery of platinum anticancer drugs
    Hardeep S. Oberoi, Natalia V. Nukolova, Alexander V. Kabanov, Tatiana K. Bronich
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2013; 65(13-14): 1667.     CrossRef
  • Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials
    Kohei Shitara, Junko Ikeda, Tomoya Yokota, Daisuke Takahari, Takashi Ura, Kei Muro, Keitaro Matsuo
    Investigational New Drugs.2012; 30(3): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Cellular interactions of platinum drugs
    Ezequiel Wexselblatt, Eylon Yavin, Dan Gibson
    Inorganica Chimica Acta.2012; 393: 75.     CrossRef
  • What do we know about the reduction of Pt(IV) pro-drugs?
    Ezequiel Wexselblatt, Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2012; 117: 220.     CrossRef
  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
    X.-L. Zhang, H.-J. Shi, S.-Z. Cui, Y.-Q. Tang, M.-C. Ba
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2011; 37(6): 466.     CrossRef
  • The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials
    Nial J. Wheate, Shonagh Walker, Gemma E. Craig, Rabbab Oun
    Dalton Transactions.2010; 39(35): 8113.     CrossRef
  • 12,120 View
  • 114 Download
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemical Expression of p53 Gene Product in Operable Breast Cancer
Hong Suk Song, Young Rok Do, Sun Hee Kang, Ki Yong Jeong, Yu Sa Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2006;38(4):218-223.   Published online December 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2006.38.4.218
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the expression of p53 gene product in operable invasive breast cancer by performing immunohistochemical analysis.

Materials and Methods

Between January 1993 and December 2001, 440 operable invasive breast cancer patients underwent immunohistochemical staining for p53, and we retrospectively analyzed these results together with the clinical outcomes.

Results

The overexpression of p53 was detected in 51.6% of the cases. The overexpression of p53 was inversely correlated with lymph node metastasis (p=0.005). The tumor size, tumor histology, histologic grade, hormonal receptor status and tumor stage were not related to the overexpression of p53. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicate that lymph node metastasis, tumor size and the p53 expression were the significant prognostic factors for overall survival; lymph node metastasis, the estrogen receptor status and the p53 expression were the significant prognostic factors for relapse free survival. On the subgroup analysis, the p53 non-expressors showed better 7-year overall survival (92.7% vs. 76.7%, respectively, p=0.011) and relapse free survival (74.9% vs. 57.8%, respectively, p=0.032) than did the p53 overexpressors for the patients with lymph node metastasis. However, for the patients without lymph node metastasis, the survival rates were not different for both the p53 non-expressors and the p53 overexpressors.

Conclusion

Immunohistochemical staining of the p53 gene product was an independent prognostic factor for predicting survival of the lymph node positive invasive breast cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic significance of RNA-based TP53 pathway function among estrogen receptor positive and negative breast cancer cases
    Amber N. Hurson, Mustapha Abubakar, Alina M. Hamilton, Kathleen Conway, Katherine A. Hoadley, Michael I. Love, Andrew F. Olshan, Charles M. Perou, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Melissa A. Troester
    npj Breast Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of histopathological grading and staging of breast cancer with p53-positive and transforming growth factor-beta receptor 2-negative immunohistochemical marker expression cases
    PalashKumar Mandal, Anindya Adhikari, Subir Biswas, Amita Giri, Arnab Gupta, Arindam Bhattacharya
    Cancer Translational Medicine.2020; 6(2): 30.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of p53 in breast cancer and its correlation with various histological prognostic factors
    Kriti Arora, Ruchee Khandelwal, Hema Pant
    Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology.2020; 7(3): 392.     CrossRef
  • Differential expression of senescence tumour markers and its implications on survival outcomes of breast cancer patients
    Rahmawati Pare, Patsy S. Soon, Aashit Shah, Cheok Soon Lee, Aamir Ahmad
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(4): e0214604.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemical expression levels of p53 and eIF4E markers in histologically negative surgical margins, and their association with the clinical outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    JAGTAR SINGH, RAMA JAYARAJ, SIDDHARTHA BAXI, MARIANA MILEVA, JOHN SKINNER, NAVNEET K. DHAND, MAHIBAN THOMAS
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2016; 4(2): 166.     CrossRef
  • Updated overview of current biomarkers in head and neck carcinoma
    Kiran Dahiya, Rakesh Dhankhar
    World Journal of Methodology.2016; 6(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of p53, HoxD10, and E-Cadherin Status in Breast Cancer and Correlation with Histological Grade and Other Prognostic Factors
    Preethi Sekar, Jyotsna Naresh Bharti, Jitendra Singh Nigam, Ankit Sharma, Priyanka Bhatia Soni
    Journal of Oncology.2014; 2014: 1.     CrossRef
  • An Australian Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Prognostic Role of p53 and eIF4E Cancer Markers in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC): Study Protocol
    Jagtar Singh, Rama Jayaraj, Siddhartha Baxi, Mariana Mileva, Justin Curtin, Mahiban Thomas
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 14(8): 4717.     CrossRef
  • Morphometric and Histological Study of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to Proliferative Activity and Invasiveness
    Asim Kumar Manna, Aparajita Samaddar, Sumit Mitra, Swapan Pathak, Srabani Chakrabarti, Diptendra Kumar Sarkar
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2013; 75(3): 204.     CrossRef
  • Exposure to depleted uranium does not alter the co-expression of HER-2/neu and p53 in breast cancer patients
    Mais M Al-Mumen, Asad A Al-Janabi, Alaa S Jumaa, Kaswer M Al-Toriahi, Akeel A Yasseen
    BMC Research Notes.2011;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Balance between SIRT1 and DBC1 expression is lost in breast cancer
    Ji‐Youn Sung, Ranah Kim, Ja‐Eun Kim, Juhie Lee
    Cancer Science.2010; 101(7): 1738.     CrossRef
  • 9,357 View
  • 89 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
A Multi-Center, Phase II Clinical Trial of Padexol™ (Paclitaxel) and Cisplatin for Patients Suffering with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Min Kyoung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Young Rok Do, Hong Suk Song, Won Sik Lee, Keon Uk Park, Jin Ho Baek, Jong Gwang Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(6):349-353.   Published online December 31, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.6.349
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

We conducted a multi-center, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using Padexol (a paclitaxel formulation) combined with cisplatin for the patients suffering with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

39 patients (median age: 60 years; males: 90%) who were diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled from 5 hospitals. Padexol 175 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-hr infusion, and this was followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion on day 1, once every 3 weeks.

Results

Out of these 39 patients, 34 patients were assessable for treatment efficacy and 39 patients were assessable for the toxicity. Objective responses occurred in 13 patients (33%); 1 patient (3%) had a complete response and 12 patients (31%) had partial responses. 6 patients (15%) achieved a stable disease state. The median duration of response was 7.1 months, and the median time to progression and the overall survival were 4.8 months and 6.7 months, respectively. The major treatment-related adverse events were hematologic toxicity, including WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 13 patients (33%). However, febrile neutropenia occurred in only 1 patient and the non-hematologic toxicity was usually mild.

Conclusion

The combination of Padexol and cisplatin was found to be active and it seems to be a relatively well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of the Weekly Administration of Liposome–Paclitaxel Combined with S-1 on Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Lei Chen, Qiang Chen, Zhixiang Zhuang, Yusong Zhang, Jialong Tao, Liqin Shen, Xudong Shen, Zhigang Chen, Ji Wang, Minggao Zhu, Hui Wang
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2014; 44(3): 208.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter phase II trial of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin triplet combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Jin Young Kim, Young Rok Do, Keon Uk Park, Jong Gwang Kim, Yee Soo Chae, Min Kyoung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sung Hwa Bae, Jin Ho Baek, Hong Suk Song
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2011; 67(3): 527.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Yuji Ueda, Hisakazu Yamagishi, Daisuke Ichikawa, Kazuma Okamoto, Eigo Otsuji, Jun Morii, Kinya Koizumi, Naoki Kakihara, Masataka Shimotsuma, Tetsuro Yamashita, Fumihiro Taniguchi, Hideki Aragane, Hiroshi Nishi, Yoshiki Itokawa, Satoshi Morita, Junichi Sak
    Gastric Cancer.2010; 13(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • TP53 codon 72 polymorphism associated with prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin
    Jong Gwang Kim, Sang Kyun Sohn, Yee Soo Chae, Hong Suk Song, Ki-Young Kwon, Young Rok Do, Min Kyoung Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Won Sik Lee, Chang-Hak Sohn, Joo Seop Jung, Gab Chul Kim, Ho Young Chung, Wansik Yu
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2009; 64(2): 355.     CrossRef
  • Multi-center Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Cancer
    Q. Sun, C. Liu, H. Zhong, B. Zhong, H. Xu, W. Shen, D. Wang
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2009; 39(4): 237.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as Salvage Therapy for Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
    Bong-Gun Seo, Sung Yong Oh, Dong Mee Lee, Hyun Seung Yoo, Suee Lee, Seong-Geun Kim, Sung-Hyun Kim, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Hyo-Jin Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2007; 39(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Jong Gwang Kim, Sang Kyun Sohn, Hong Suk Song, Ki-Young Kwon, Young Rok Do, Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sung Hwa Bae, Keon Uk Park, Jin Ho Baek, Won Sik Lee, Joo Seop Chung, Goon Jae Cho, Chang-Hak Sohn, Jung Soon Jang, Ho Young Chung, Wan
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2007; 60(6): 863.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy and Safety of Padexol® (Paclitaxel) and Cisplatin for Treating Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hoon-Kyo Kim, Jun Suk Kim, Hun Mo Ryoo, Dong Gun Shin, Byoung Young Shim, Kyong Hwa Park, Sung Hwa Bae, Chi Hong Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2006; 38(2): 66.     CrossRef
  • 10,251 View
  • 72 Download
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemical Expression of EGFR and C-erbB-2 Oncoprotein in Curatively Resected Gastric Cancer
Hong Suk Song, Young Rok Do, In Ho Kim, Soo Sang Sohn, Kun Young Kwon
Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(4):240-245.   Published online August 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.4.240
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the expression of EGFR and C-erbB-2 gene products by immunohistochemical analysis for curatively resected gastric adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Between January 1996 and December 2001, 739 patients with curatively resected gastric cancer patients underwent immunohistochemical staining for EGFR and C-erbB-2 proteins, and we retrospectively analyzed their correlation with the clinical outcome.

Results

The overexpressions of EGFR and C-erbB-2 were 25.4% and 26.2%, respectively. The overexpressions of EGFR was associated with the more poorly differentiated tumor (p=0.000) and with neuronal invasion (p=0.03). Overexpression of C-erbB-2 was associated with less vascular invasion (p=0.001). Tumor depth or node metastasis was not related to the overexpression of EGFR or C-erbB-2. The seven-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 87.2% and 75.8%, respectively. Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, the tumor stage, tumor size and patient age were important prognostic factors for overall survival, and tumor stage was the important factor for relapse-free survival. Overexpressions of EGFR or c-erbB-2 were not significant prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Immunohistochemical staining of EGFR and C-erbB-2 gene products were not independent prognostic factors for predicting the overall survival and the relapse-free survival in curatively resected gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • GRB7-mediated enhancement of cell malignant characteristics induced by Helicobacter pylori infection
    Huilin Zhao, Si Chen, Xinfeng Bai, Jianhui Zhang, Shuzhen Liu, Zekun Sun, Xinying Cao, Jianping Wang, Ying Zhang, Boqing Li, Xiaofei Ji
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 gene expression positivity determined by silver in situ hybridization/immunohistochemistry methods and associated factors in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with gastric adenocarcinoma: a prospective study
    Duminda Subasinghe, Nathan Acott, Pasyodun Koralage Buddhika Mahesh, Sivasuriya Sivaganesh, Sithum Munasinghe, Mariyan Priyanthi Kumarasinghe, Dharmabandu Nandaveva Samarasekera, Menaka Dilani Samarawickrema Lokuhetty
    Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep muscularis propria tumor invasion without lymph node metastasis as a unique subclassification of stage IB gastric cancer: a retrospective study
    Kang He, Cheng Chen, Lei Xia, Lixiang Si, Xiaohua Pan, Zijian Sun, Yajing Wang, Yingying Jiang, Yue Shi, Bin Zhou, Shuaiyu Wang, Jing Han, Bo Shen, Guoren Zhou, Jianwei Lu, Xiaohua Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Expression of HER2/c-erbB-2, EGFR protein in gastric carcinoma and its clinical significance
    Guoxiong Cheng, Yijun Mei, Xiaoming Pan, Ming Liu, Suping Wu
    Open Life Sciences.2019; 14(1): 119.     CrossRef
  • An independent survival prognostic role for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis
    Y. Wang, L. He, Y. Cheng
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2018; 20(2): 212.     CrossRef
  • IGF-IR cooperates with ERα to inhibit breast cancer cell aggressiveness by regulating the expression and localisation of ECM molecules
    Nikolaos A. Afratis, Panagiotis Bouris, Spyros S. Skandalis, Hinke A. Multhaupt, John R. Couchman, Achilleas D. Theocharis, Nikos K. Karamanos
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The clinicopathological parameters and prognostic significance of HER2 expression in gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis of literature
    Yu-ying Lei, Jin-yu Huang, Qiong-rui Zhao, Nan Jiang, Hui-mian Xu, Zhen-ning Wang, Hai-qing Li, Shi-bo Zhang, Zhe Sun
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Significance of c-MET and EGFR Overexpression in Resected Gastric Adenocarcinomas
    Aleksandra Paliga, Horia Marginean, Basile Tessier-Cloutier, Bibianna Purgina, Derek Jonker, Esmeralda C. Marginean
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2017; 40(6): 543.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis
    Zhiqiao Zhang, Hongfeng Tang, Jixin Lin, Yunzhao Hu, Guanying Luo, Zhaowen Luo, Canchang Cheng, Peng Wang
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(10): 17202.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Expression of the Human Epithelial Receptor 2 (HER2) in Gastric Carcinoma
    Roberto de Moraes Cordts Filho, Paulo Kassab, Laura Carolina Lopez Claro, Mabel Tatty de Medeiros Fracassi, Patrícia Colombo-Souza, Daniel Kenji Fukuhara, Fábio Rodrigues Thuler, Wilson Rodrigues de Freitas Junior, Elias Jirjoss Ilias, Carlos Alberto Malh
    The Scientific World Journal.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic impact of EGFR, ErbB2 and MET gene amplification in human gastric carcinomas as measured by quantitative Real-Time PCR
    Ghasem Janbabai, Ziaeddin Oladi, Touraj Farazmandfar, Tarang Taghvaei, Farshad Naghshvar
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2015; 141(11): 1945.     CrossRef
  • The effect of epiregulin on epidermal growth factor receptor expression and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines
    Darren Chyi-Hsiang Kong, Kenneth Yee Chew, Eng Tan, Suan Khoo
    Cancer Cell International.2014; 14(1): 65.     CrossRef
  • Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor status on the outcomes of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A pilot study
    K. AYDIN, S.K. OKUTUR, M. BOZKURT, I. TURKMEN, E. NAMAL, K. PILANCI, A. OZTURK, Z. AKCALI, G. DOGUSOY, O.G. DEMIR
    Oncology Letters.2014; 7(1): 255.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic gastric cancer treatment: a little slow but worthy progress
    Ozkan Kanat, Bert H. O’Neil
    Medical Oncology.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer: Current and future targeted therapies
    Roberto A. Pazo Cid, Antonio Antón
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2013; 85(3): 350.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with metastatic gastric cancer
    Akin Atmaca, Dominique Werner, Claudia Pauligk, Kristina Steinmetz, Ralph Wirtz, Hans-Michael Altmannsberger, Elke Jäger, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
    BMC Cancer.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic factors associated with HER2‐positive gastric cancer and its impact on survival outcomes—A systematic review
    Terence C. Chua, Neil D. Merrett
    International Journal of Cancer.2012; 130(12): 2845.     CrossRef
  • Bioinformatics analysis with graph-based clustering to detect gastric cancer-related pathways
    P. Liu, X. Wang, C.H. Hu, T.H. Hu
    Genetics and Molecular Research.2012; 11(3): 3497.     CrossRef
  • Evolving Standards of Care in Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, Patrick Dufour
    Future Oncology.2011; 7(12): 1441.     CrossRef
  • 10,363 View
  • 63 Download
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Primary Gastrointestinal Lymphoma: A Comparison of Survival Rates between Gastric and Intestinal Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Sang Mi Yun, Hong Suk Song
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2001;33(2):183-189.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in survival rates between primary gastric and intestinal gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and to investigate risk factors for survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed survival rates and risk factors in 60 cases with stage I and II primary gastrointestinal lymphomas treated at Keimyung University Hospital between January 1972 and August 1999.
RESULTS
No differences in sex, age, histology, stage, or percentage of curative resection were observed between primary gastric and intestinal lymphoma. The overall 10-year survival rates of gastric and intestinal NHL were 68.1% and 39.6%, respectively (p<0.05). The overall 10-year survival rates in stage I gastric and intestinal NHL were 66.7% and 70.0%, respectively, while those in stageII were 65.1% and 23.7%, respectively (p<0.001). A multivariate analysis of risk factors for survival revealed that the site of origin (5.68, CI=1.8-17.5) and stage (4.22, CI= 1.19-14.85) were significantly correlated with prognosis (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the expression of bcl-2 and p53 between gastric and intestinal NHL. Furthermore bcl-2 and p53 expressions were not correlated with the prognosis.
CONCLUSION
This study indicates that stage II primary intestinal lymphoma has lower survival rate than gastric lymphoma.
  • 3,341 View
  • 26 Download
Close layer
A case of primary malignant lymphoma of the trachea
Ki Young Kwon, Kyung Rye Kim, Soo Ho Son, Young Kook Kim, Hong Suk Song
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1993;25(1):129-133.
AbstractAbstract PDF
No abstract available.
  • 2,554 View
  • 13 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP