Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
12 "Byong Chang Jeong"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Genitourinary cancer
Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Selective Bladder Preservation Chemoradiotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Studies
Sung Wook Cho, Sung Hee Lim, Ghee Young Kwon, Chan Kyo Kim, Won Park, Hongryull Pyo, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(3):893-897.   Published online February 15, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.015
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment strategy for muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (MIBC). A combined analysis of raw data from two prospective phase II studies was performed to better evaluate the feasibility of selective bladder preservation CRT.
Materials and Methods
The analysis was based on primary efficacy data from two independent studies, including 76 MIBC patients receiving NAC followed by bladder preservation CRT. The efficacy data included metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). For the present analysis, starting point of survival was defined as the date of commencing CRT.
Results
Among 76 patients, 66 had a cCR following NAC. Sixty-four patients received gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy in neoadjuvant setting, and 12 received nivolumab plus GC. Bladder preservation CRT following NAC was generally well-tolerated, with low urinary tract symptoms being the most common late complication. With a median follow-up of 64 months, recurrence was recorded in 43 patients (57%): intravesical only (n=20), metastatic only (n=16), and both (n=7). In 27 patients with intravesical recurrence, transurethral resection, and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin treatment was given to 17 patients. Salvage cystectomy was performed in 10 patients. Median DFS was 46.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.1 to 67.5) months, and the median MFS was not reached. Neither DFS nor MFS appeared to be affected by any of the baseline characteristics. However, DFS was significantly longer in patients with a cCR than in those without (hazard ratio, 0.465; 95% CI, 0.222 to 0.976).
Conclusion
The strategy of NAC followed by selective bladder preservation CRT based on the cCR is feasible in the treatment of MIBC. A standardized definition of cCR is needed to better assess disease status post-NAC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • News and prospects on radiotherapy for bladder cancer: Is trimodal therapy becoming the gold standard?
    Olivier Riou, Christophe Hennequin, Jonathan Khalifa, Paul Sargos
    Cancer/Radiothérapie.2024; 28(6-7): 623.     CrossRef
  • 3,386 View
  • 165 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Single Early Intravesical Instillation of Epirubicin for Preventing Bladder Recurrence after Nephroureterectomy in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Jong Hoon Lee, Chung Un Lee, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Hwan Sung
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(3):877-884.   Published online January 17, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.1219
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early single intravesical administration of epirubicin in preventing intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between November 2018 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Intravesical epirubicin was administered within 48 hours if no evidence of leakage was observed. Epirubicin (50 mg) in 50 mL normal saline solution was introduced into the bladder via a catheter and maintained for 60 minutes. The severity of adverse events was graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We compared intravesical recurrence rate between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of bladder recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy.
Results
Epirubicin (n=55) and control (n=116) groups were included in the analysis. No grade 1 or higher bladder symptoms have been reported. A statistically significant difference in the intravesical recurrence rate was observed between the two groups (11.8% at 1 year in the epirubicin group vs. 28.4% at 1 year in the control group; log-rank p=0.039). In multivariate analysis, epirubicin instillation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.93; p=0.033) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.65; p=0.003) were independently predictive of a reduced incidence of bladder recurrence.
Conclusion
This retrospective review revealed that a single immediate intravesical instillation of epirubicin is safe and can reduce the incidence of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. However, further prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The role of intravesical chemotherapy following nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefano Moretto, Andrea Piccolini, Andrea Gallioli, Roberto Contieri, Nicolomaria Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Alberto Breda, Michael Baboudjian, Bas WG van Rhijn, Morgan Roupret, Alessandro Uleri, Benjamin Pradere
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2025; 43(3): 191.e1.     CrossRef
  • 2,669 View
  • 106 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-World, Retrospective Study
Junho Lee, Sung Hee Lim, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(3):871-876.   Published online January 16, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.1226
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), administered following radical nephroureterectomy.
Materials and Methods
Patients with UTUC, arising from renal pelvis or ureter, staged pT3/T4 or N+ were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery. The chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles. Endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and safety.
Results
Among 89 eligible patients, 85 (95.5%) completed at least 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, the main toxicities being mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal toxic effects and pruritus. With a median follow-up of 37 months, median DFS was 30 months (95% confidence interval, 22 to 39), and the median MFS was not reached. The 3-year DFS and MFS were 44% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the main factor associated with DFS and MFS was the lymph node involvement, whereas age, T category, grade, or the primary site of UTUC were not significantly associated with DFS or MFS.
Conclusion
Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after radical surgery of pT3/T4 or N+ UTUC was feasible and may demonstrate benefits in DFS and MFS. Whether novel agents added to the chemotherapy regimen, as a concurrent combination or maintenance, impacts on survival or reduces the development of metastases remains to be studied.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cisplatin/gemcitabine

    Reactions Weekly.2024; 2027(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • 3,000 View
  • 130 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
TNM-Based Head-to-Head Comparison of Urachal Carcinoma and Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Stage-Matched Analysis of a Large Multicenter National Cohort
Sang Hun Song, Jaewon Lee, Young Hwii Ko, Jong Wook Kim, Seung Il Jung, Seok Ho Kang, Jinsung Park, Ho Kyung Seo, Hyung Joon Kim, Byong Chang Jeong, Tae-Hwan Kim, Se Young Choi, Jong Kil Nam, Ja Yoon Ku, Kwan Joong Joo, Won Sik Jang, Young Eun Yoon, Seok Joong Yun, Sung-Hoo Hong, Jong Jin Oh
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1337-1345.   Published online April 17, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.417
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Outcome analysis of urachal cancer (UraC) is limited due to the scarcity of cases and different staging methods compared to urothelial bladder cancer (UroBC). We attempted to assess survival outcomes of UraC and compare to UroBC after stage-matched analyses.
Materials and Methods
Total 203 UraC patients from a multicenter database and 373 UroBC patients in single institution from 2000 to 2018 were enrolled (median follow-up, 32 months). Sheldon stage conversion to corresponding TNM staging for UraC was conducted for head-to-head comparison to UroBC. Perioperative clinical variables and pathological results were recorded. Stage-matched analyses for survival by stage were conducted.
Results
UraC patients were younger (mean age, 54 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001), with 163 patients (80.3%) receiving partial cystectomy and 23 patients (11.3%) radical cystectomy. UraC was more likely to harbor ≥ pT3a tumors (78.8% vs. 41.8%). While 5-year recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were comparable between two groups (63.4%, 67%, and 62.1% in UraC and 61.5%, 75.9%, and 67.8% in UroBC, respectively), generally favorable prognosis for UraC in lower stages (pT1-2) but unfavorable outcomes in higher stages (pT4) compared to UroBC was observed, although only 5-year CSS in ≥ pT4 showed statistical significance (p=0.028). Body mass index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.929), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.921), pathologic T category (HR, 3.846), and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.993) were predictors of CSS for all patients.
Conclusion
Despite differing histology, UraC has comparable prognosis to UroBC with relatively favorable outcome in low stages but worse prognosis in higher stages. The presented system may be useful for future grading and risk stratification of UraC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Presentation and Targeted Interventions in Urachal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Case Series and Review of Emerging Therapies
    Akshay Mathavan, Akash Mathavan, Rodrigo Murillo-Alvarez, Kriti Gera, Urszula Krekora, Aaron J. Winer, Mohit Mathavan, Ellery Altshuler, Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2024; 22(1): 67.     CrossRef
  • Robotic‐assisted approaches to urachal carcinoma: A comprehensive systematic review of the safety and efficacy outcomes
    Caio Vinícius Suartz, Lucas Motta Martinez, Pedro Henrique Brito, Carlos Victori Neto, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Luiz Antonio Assan Botelho, Fábio Pescarmona Gallucci, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro‐Filho
    BJUI Compass.2024; 5(3): 327.     CrossRef
  • 3,665 View
  • 208 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder
Hongsik Kim, Byong Chang Jeong, Joohyun Hong, Ghee Young Kwon, Chan Kyo Kim, Won Park, Hongryull Pyo, Wan Song, Hyun Hwan Sung, Jung Yong Hong, Se Hoon Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(2):636-642.   Published online October 6, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.343
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The activity and safety of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (N+GC) were tested in patients with muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (MIBC).
Materials and Methods
In a prospective phase II trial, patients with cT2-T4a N0 MIBC who were eligible for cisplatin and medically appropriate to undergo radical cystectomy (RC) were enrolled. Treatment with nivolumab 3 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 plus GC (cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) was repeated every 28 days up to 3 or 4 cycles, depending on the surgery schedules. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0). Secondary endpoints included pathologic downstaging (≤ ypT1), disease-free survival (DFS), and safety.
Results
Between September 2019 and October 2020, 51 patients were enrolled. Neoadjuvant N+GC was well tolerated. Among 49 patients who completed neoadjuvant N+GC, clinical complete response (cCR) was achieved in 59% of intent-to-treat (ITT) population. RC was performed in 34 (69%) patients. pCR was achieved in 24% (12/49) of ITT population and 35% (12/34) of RC patients. Median DFS was not reached. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 12 patients experienced disease recurrence and were treated with palliative therapy or surgery. Although 12 patients declined surgery and were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, DFS was longer in patients with cCR after neoadjuvant therapy than those without. Preoperative programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) did not correlate with pCR or pathologic downstaging rates.
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant N+GC was feasible and provided meaningful pathologic responses in patients with MIBC, regardless of baseline PD-L1 expression (ONO-4538-X41; CRIS.nih.go.kr, KCT0003804).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluating Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapeutic Response for Bladder Carcinoma Using Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI
    Lingmin Kong, Bei Weng, Qian Cai, Ling Ma, Wenxin Cao, Yanling Chen, Long Qian, Yan Guo, Junxing Chen, Huanjun Wang
    Academic Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current and Future Role of Circulating DNA in the Diagnosis and Management of Urothelial Carcinoma
    Joaquim Bellmunt, Brian M. Russell, Bernadett Szabados, Begoña P. Valderrama, Rosa Nadal
    American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and combined chemotherapy with immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Hao Zhang
    American Journal of Translational Research.2025; 17(1): 125.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shibo Huang, Yanping Huang, Chunyan Li, Yiwen Liang, Miaoyan Huang, Raoshan Luo, Weiming Liang
    Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What’s new about the tumor microenvironment of urothelial carcinoma?
    João Queirós Coelho, Maria João Ramos, Ridhi Ranchor, Rita Pichel, Laura Guerra, Hugo Miranda, Joana Simões, Sérgio Xavier Azevedo, Joana Febra, António Araújo
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2024; 26(7): 1549.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric insight into neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer: trends, collaborations, and future avenues
    Yi Huang, Chengxiao Liao, Zefeng Shen, Yitong Zou, Weibin Xie, Qinghua Gan, Yuhui Yao, JunJiong Zheng, Jianqiu Kong
    Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bladder-sparing treatment using tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a real-world study
    Cheng Luo, Shuhang Luo, Wumier Wusimanjiang, Zongren Wang, Ping Liu, Bin Wang, Dan Yuan, Hao Lin, Abai Xu, Nan Deng, Kaihui Wu, Xuejin Zhu, Peng Xu, Junxing Chen, Bin Huang
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2024; 26(7): 1759.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Selective Bladder Preservation Chemoradiotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Studies
    Sung Wook Cho, Sung Hee Lim, Ghee Young Kwon, Chan Kyo Kim, Won Park, Hongryull Pyo, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 893.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Durvalumab with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Operable Bladder Cancer
    Thomas Powles, James W.F. Catto, Matthew D. Galsky, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Joshua J. Meeks, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Toan Quang Vu, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Pawel Wiechno, Vagif Atduev, Ariel G. Kann, Tae-Hwan Kim, Cristina Suárez, Chao-Hsiang Chang, Florian Roghmann, M
    New England Journal of Medicine.2024; 391(19): 1773.     CrossRef
  • Klassische Chemotherapie, Immuntherapie oder adjuvante Strahlentherapie – Wie können wir die onkologischen Ergebnisse der radikalen Zystektomie verbessern?
    Pia Paffenholz, Stefanie Zschäbitz
    Die Urologie.2024; 63(10): 994.     CrossRef
  • Recent developments in perioperative combination therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Jan-Jaap J. Mellema, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Michiel S. van der Heijden
    Current Opinion in Urology.2023; 33(5): 404.     CrossRef
  • 6,259 View
  • 284 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Genomic Sequencing for Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma and Its Clinical Implications for Immunotherapy
Ryul Kim, Jung Yong Hong, Jeeyun Lee, Ghee Young Kwon, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):894-906.   Published online November 17, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.854
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to explore the genomic and transcriptomic landscape of bladder cancer (BC) and its implication for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI).
Materials and Methods
We analyzed whole-exome and -transcriptome sequences of tumor samples from 64 BC patients who underwent surgical resection with either transurethral resection or radical cystectomy. For exploratory purposes, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was evaluated in a subset of patients (n=57) including those treated with ICI (n=8).
Results
We identified frequent molecular dysregulations in chromatin regulatory genes (KDM6A, ARID1A, MLL2, and STAG2) and recurrent copy number alterations. Thirty-five samples (54.7%) were PD-L1–positive (PD-L1 combined positive score ≥ 1) with a significantly higher exonic tumor mutational burden (TMB) compared to PD-L1–negative BC samples (p=0.010). We observed that various immune-responsive pathways, including the PD-L1 signaling pathway, were enriched significantly in PD-L1–positive BCs. Interestingly, genes in the CTLA4 pathway were enriched significantly in PD-L1–positive BC as well. Among eight patients who received ICI, progressive disease was confirmed in one patient, whose tumor had low exonic TMB, negative PD-L1 status, and a relatively colder microenvironment.
Conclusion
Gaining new insights into the molecular landscape of BC will improve treatment strategies. Our analysis suggests a rationale for studying dual checkpoint inhibition against BC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Signaling Pathway for Cancer Therapy: Focus on Biomarkers
    Areti Strati, Christos Adamopoulos, Ioannis Kotsantis, Amanda Psyrri, Evi Lianidou, Athanasios G. Papavassiliou
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(3): 1235.     CrossRef
  • Development of a technique for diagnosis and screening of superficial bladder cancer by cell-pellet DNA from urine sample
    Jaekwon Seok, Hee Jeong Kwak, Chan-Koo Kang, Ah Ram Kim, Woo Suk Choi, Hyoung Keun Park, Sung Hyun Paick, Hyeong Gon Kim, Yeonjoo Kwak, Tak-Il Jeon, Kyung Min Lim, Baeckseung Lee, Aram Kim, Ssang-Goo Cho
    Laboratory Investigation.2025; : 104124.     CrossRef
  • The role of lysine-specific demethylase 6A (KDM6A) in tumorigenesis and its therapeutic potentials in cancer therapy
    Li-Juan Chen, Xin-Yang Xu, Xiao-Dan Zhong, Yan-Jun Liu, Ming-Hui Zhu, Fan Tao, Chang-Yun Li, Qiu-Sheng She, Guan-Jun Yang, Jiong Chen
    Bioorganic Chemistry.2023; 133: 106409.     CrossRef
  • A novel cuproptosis-related lncRNAs signature predicts prognostic and immune of bladder urothelial carcinoma
    Zheng Zhou, Yusong Zhou, Wei Liu, Jing Dai
    Frontiers in Genetics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Implication of KDM6A in Bladder Cancer
    Marianne Matar, Gilles Prince, Ibrahim Hamati, Maria Baalbaky, Jonas Fares, Marc Aoude, Charbel Matar, Hampig Raphael Kourie
    Pharmacogenomics.2023; 24(9): 509.     CrossRef
  • Subsequent Systemic Therapy following Platinum and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Joohyun Hong, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 2005.     CrossRef
  • Antineoplastics

    Reactions Weekly.2022; 1933(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • Cuproptosis-related lncRNA signatures predict prognosis and immune relevance of kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma
    Tongjin Xie, Bin Liu, Dongbo Liu, Yusong Zhou, Qingping Yang, Dai Wang, Mengjie Tang, Wei Liu
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,701 View
  • 247 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Risk Factors and Patterns of Locoregional Recurrence after Radical Nephrectomy for Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Gyu Sang Yoo, Won Park, Hongryull Pyo, Byong Chang Jeong, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Minyong Kang, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Han Yong Choi, Byung Kwan Park, Chan Kyo Kim, Sung Yoon Park, Ghee Young Kwon
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):218-225.   Published online April 15, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1373
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
We aimed to investigate the risk factors and patterns of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 245 patients who underwent RN for non-metastatic pT3-4 RCC from January 2006 to January 2016. We analyzed the risk factors associated with poor locoregional control using Cox regression. Anatomical mapping was performed on reference computed tomography scans showing intact kidneys.
Results
The median follow-up duration was 56 months (range, 1 to 128 months). Tumor extension to renal vessels or the inferior vena cava (IVC) and Fuhrman’s nuclear grade IV were identified as independent risk factors of LRR. The 5-year actuarial LRR rates in groups with no risk factor, one risk factor, and two risk factors were 2.3%, 19.8%, and 30.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). The locations of LRR were distributed as follows: aortocaval area (n=2), paraaortic area (n=4), retrocaval area (n=5), and tumor bed (n=11). No LRR was observed above the celiac axis (CA) or under the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Conclusion
Tumor extension to renal vessels or the IVC and Fuhrman’s nuclear grade IV were the independent risk factors associated with LRR after RN for pT3-4 RCC. The locations of LRR after RN for RCC were distributed in the tumor bed and regional lymphatic area from the bifurcation of the CA to that of the IMA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Early-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma: Who Needs Adjuvant Therapy?
    Andreea Ioana Parosanu, Cornelia Nititpir, Ioana Miruna Stanciu, Catalin Baston
    Biomedicines.2025; 13(3): 543.     CrossRef
  • Survival pattern of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients according to WHO/ISUP grade: a long-term multi-institutional study
    Joongwon Choi, Seokhwan Bang, Jungyo Suh, Chang Il Choi, Wan Song, Hyeong Dong Yuk, Chan Ho Lee, Minyong Kang, Seol Ho Choo, Jung Kwon Kim, Hyung Ho Lee, Jung Ki Jo, Eu Chang Hwang, Chang Wook Jeong, Young Hwii Ko, Jae Young Park, Cheryn Song, Seong Il Se
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Landscape and Future Direction
    Dylan M Buller, Maria Antony, Benjamin T Ristau
    OncoTargets and Therapy.2023; Volume 16: 49.     CrossRef
  • 6,894 View
  • 152 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Genitourinary Cancer
Effects of Complete Bladder Cuff Removal on Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Hyunsoo Ryoo, Jungyu Kim, Taejin Kim, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Hyun Hwan Sung
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(3):795-802.   Published online December 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.919
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of bladder cuff method on oncological outcomes in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
The records of 1,095 patients treated with RNU performed at our hospital between 1994 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed; 856 patients with no bladder tumor history were enrolled in the present study. The management of bladder cuff was divided into two categories: extravesical ligation (EL) or transvesical resection (TR). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine which factors were associated with intravesical recurrence (IVR)–free survival (IVRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).
Results
The mean patient age was 64.8 years and the median follow-up was 37.7 months. Among the 865 patients, 477 (55.7%) underwent the TR and 379 (44.3%) the EL. Significantly higher IVRFS (p=0.001) and OS (p=0.013) were observed in the TR group. In multivariable analysis, IVR, CSS, and OS were independently associated with the EL. Among 379 patients treated with the EL, eight underwent remnant ureterectomy. Based on radical cystectomy–free survival, significant difference was not observed between the two groups. However, significantly higher IVRFS was observed in the TR group when the tumor was located in the renal pelvis.
Conclusion
Intramural complete excision of the distal ureter during RNU should be the gold standard approach compared with EL for the management of distal ureter in terms of oncological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Single Early Intravesical Instillation of Epirubicin for Preventing Bladder Recurrence after Nephroureterectomy in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
    Jong Hoon Lee, Chung Un Lee, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Hwan Sung
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 877.     CrossRef
  • Violation of onco-surgical principles is associated with survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinomas after radical nephroureterectomy
    Ioannis Patras, Johan Abrahamsson, Axel Gerdtsson, Martin Nyberg, Ymir Saemundsson, Elin Ståhl, Anne Sörenby, Åsa Warnolf, Johannes Bobjer, Fredrik Liedberg
    Scandinavian Journal of Urology.2024; 59: 131.     CrossRef
  • Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Ichiro Tsuboi, Akihiro Matsukawa, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Jakob Klemm, Robert J Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Sever Chiujdea, Tamás Fazekas, Marcin Miszczyk, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Kensuke Bekku, Koi
    World Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of bladder cuff excision on outcomes after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry
    Courtney Yong, James E. Slaven, Zhenjie Wu, Vitaly Margulis, Hooman Djaladat, Alessandro Antonelli, Giuseppe Simone, Raj Bhanvadia, Alireza Ghoreifi, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Francesco Ditonno, Gabriele Tuderti, Stephan Bronimann, Sohail Dhanji, Benjam
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2024; 42(11): 373.e1.     CrossRef
  • A new nomogram for predicting extraurothelial recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy
    Hao Wu, Dan Jia, Xianyu Dai, Hongliang Cao, Fulin Wang, Tong Yang, Lei Wang, Tao Xu, Baoshan Gao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perioperative and oncological outcomes of distal ureter management during nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andrea GALLIOLI, Michael BABOUDJIAN, Pietro DIANA, Marco MOSCHINI, Evanguelos XYLINAS, Francesco DEL GIUDICE, Ekaterina LAUKHTINA, Francesco SORIA, Andrea MARI, José D. SUBIELA, Mathieu ROUY, Angelo TERRITO, Giuseppe BASILE, Joan PALOU, Benjamin PRADERE,
    Minerva Urology and Nephrology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting and Decreasing Bladder Tumor Recurrence Following Nephroureterectomy
    Hiroko Miyagi, Elizabeth A. Di Valerio, Padraic O’Malley, Wayne G. Brisbane, Li-Ming Su, Paul L. Crispen
    Frontiers in Urology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inadvertent radical nephrectomy leads to worse prognosis in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma patients: A propensity score-matched study
    Feixiang Wu, Pan Zhang, Lingxun Li, Shiqing Lin, Jianhong Liu, Yi Sun, Yuanlong Wang, Chengjun Luo, Yu Huang, Xiao Yan, Meng Zhang, Guixi Liu, Kun Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,960 View
  • 152 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Atezolizumab in Patients with Pretreated Urothelial Cancer: a Korean Single-Center, Retrospective Study
Joon Young Hur, Youjin Kim, Ghee-Young Kwon, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Su Jin Lee, Se Hoon Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1269-1274.   Published online January 9, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.604
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Treatment targeting immune checkpoint with programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). We investigated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in mUC patients who failed platinum-based chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study using the Samsung Medical Center cancer chemotherapy registry was performed on 50 consecutive patients with mUC treated with atezolizumab, regardless of their PD-L1(SP142) status, as salvage therapy after chemotherapy failure between May 2017 and June 2018. Endpoints included overall response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.
Results
Among 50 patients, men constituted 76% and the median age was 68 years (range, 46 to 82 years). Twenty-three patients (46%) received atezolizumab as second-line therapy. PD-L1 (SP142) status IC0/1 and IC2/3 were found in 21 (42%) and 21 (42%) of patients, respectively; in eight patients (16%), PD-L1 (SP142) expression was not available. Atezolizumab was generally well tolerated, with pruritus and fatigue being the most commonly observed toxicities. As a result, partial response was noted in 20 patients (40%), with 12 (24%) stable diseases. RRwas higherin IC2/3 (62%) than in IC0/1 patients (24%, p=0.013). The median PFS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval, 3.4 to 11.4 months). As expected, PFS also was significantly longer in IC2/3 patients than in IC0/1 (median, 12.7 vs. 2.1 months; p=0.005). PFS was not significantly influenced by age, sex, performance status, number of previous chemotherapy, site of metastases, or any of the baseline laboratory parameters.
Conclusion
In this retrospective study, atezolizumab demonstrated clinically efficacy and tolerability in unselected mUC patients who failed platinum-based chemotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Real-world data of atezolizumab in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer
    Rocío Díaz Acedo, Mercedes Galvan Banqueri, Silvia Artacho Criado, Eva María Fernández Parra, Rocío Jiménez Galán, Ana Isabel Gago Sánchez, Juan Francisco Marín Pozo, María José Martínez Bautista
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2024; 46(2): 382.     CrossRef
  • Subsequent Systemic Therapy following Platinum and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Joohyun Hong, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 2005.     CrossRef
  • Systemic treatment for advanced urothelial cancer: an update on recent clinical trials and current treatment options
    Inkeun Park, Jae Lyun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2020; 35(4): 834.     CrossRef
  • 7,709 View
  • 283 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Oncologic, Perioperative Outcomes of Female Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multicenter Study in Korea
Ji Sung Shim, Ho Kyung Seo, Ja Hyeon Ku, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Seok Ho Kang, UCART (Urothelial Cancer-Advanced Research and Treatment Group in Korea) Group
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1064-1072.   Published online October 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.515
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The lower incidence of bladder cancer among women has led to a lack of information on female radical cystectomy (RC). This study aimed to analyze the characteristics related with female RC in a cohort from multiple academic institutions.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective review of 384 female patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer. Epidemiologic, perioperative variables including urologic referral periodwith consequent pathologic stage distributions were assessed. The changes in surgical techniques over time were illustrated. Also, we evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 2 and 5 years and overall survival (OS) at 5 years with stage-specific analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
The mean follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile rage [IQR], 9 to 55). The average time to urologic referral with initial symptoms was 5.5 (IQR, 1 to 6) months and over 20% of patients visited clinics after 6 months. In subsequent stage distributions according to referral period, T2 or higher stage distributions were abruptly increased after 1 year. Overall 2-year/5-year RFS rates were 0.72/0.57 and 5-year OS was 0.61. Notable surgical descriptions were as follows: 91% of patients underwent open RC; 80% of patients underwent an ileal conduit; and 83% of patients received anterior exenteration. However, the proportions of robotic surgery, orthotopic neobladder and organ sparing cystectomy have increased recen-tly.
Conclusion
We identified the general characteristics and changes in pattern of female RC. Our results also suggest that women are susceptible to delays in referral to an urologist and are at greater risk for worse prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Perioperative, oncological, and survival outcomes of robotic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion in females
    Varun V. Agarwal, B. Yuvaraja Thyavihally, Santosh Subhash Waigankar, Preetham Dev, Abhinav P. Pednekar, Diptiman Roy, Nevitha Athikari, Meenal Hastak, Naresh Badlani, D. Harshwardhan Pokharkar, Nagaraja Sekhar Ayyalasomayajula, Archan Khandekar, Ashish A
    Indian Journal of Urology.2023; 39(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Efficacy of Reproductive Organ-Sparing Radical Cystectomy in Women With Variant Histology and Advanced Stage
    Sunil H. Patel, Shirley Wang, Meredith R. Metcalf, Natasha Gupta, Andrew Gabrielson, Esther Lee, Mary Rostom, Phil Pierorazio, Armine Smith, Noah Hahn, Mark Schoenberg, Max Kates, Jean Hoffman-Censits, Trinity J. Bivalacqua
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2022; 20(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal urinary diversion based on radical cystectomy pentafecta
    Tae Il Noh, Ji Sung Shim, Sung Gu Kang, Jun Cheon, Jong Hyun Pyun, Seok Ho Kang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,080 View
  • 144 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Laparoscopy versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Prognostic Outcome of Patients with Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Score Matching Analysis
Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Jung Kwon Kim, Bumsik Hong, Seok Ho Kang, Ja Hyeon Ku, Byong Chang Jeong, Ho Kyung Seo, On behalf of Urothelial Cancer-Advanced Research and Treatment (UCART) Study Group
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):963-972.   Published online October 12, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.465
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes between open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
The medical records of consecutive ONU and LNU cases from five tertiary institutions were retrospectively analyzed between 2000 and 2012. The propensity-score matching methodology was used to compare the two surgical approaches in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, grade, pathologic T and N categories, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and follow-up duration. The Kaplan-Meier with log-rank tests and clustered Cox regression were used to compare the estimated rates of survival for each surgical approach and to investigate the effect of the surgical approach on each prognostic outcome.
Results
Six hundred thirty-eight propensity-score matching pairs (n=1,276) were compared; LNU was significantly better than ONU in all types of survival, including intravesical recurrencefree survival (IVRFS), disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.05). The 3-year OS and CSS rates were significantly higher with LNU than with ONU (p < 0.05). Compared with ONU, LNU had significantly better 3-year OS and CSS rates (82.9% and 86.2% vs. 78.3% and 81.8%); there were no differences at 5 years. In subgroup analysis of the early-staged group, advanced-stage group, lymph node–positive group, and lymph node–negative group, the two approaches did not significantly affect prognostic outcomes, except LNU improved the IVRFS in the lymph node–negative or no history of previous bladder cancer group.
Conclusion
LNU had a significantly better prognostic outcome than ONU after propensity-score matching.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic effects of different nephroureterectomy techniques for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis
    Huan Wen, Yu Zhou, Lin Yang
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies
    Shidong Deng, Lingzhi Liu, Yurou Wang, Chuan Zhou, Huihui Zhang
    Surgical Innovation.2024; 31(5): 520.     CrossRef
  • Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Ichiro Tsuboi, Akihiro Matsukawa, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Jakob Klemm, Robert J Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Sever Chiujdea, Tamás Fazekas, Marcin Miszczyk, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Kensuke Bekku, Koi
    World Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Nico C. Grossmann, Francesco Soria, Tristan Juvet, Aaron M. Potretzke, Hooman Djaladat, Alireza Ghoreifi, Eiji Kikuchi, Andrea Mari, Zine-Eddine Khene, Kazutoshi Fujita, Jay D. Raman, Alberto Breda, Matteo Fontana, John P. Sfakianos, John L. Pfail, Ekater
    Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1409.     CrossRef
  • Factors Predicting Oncological Outcomes of Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Taiwan
    I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Chao-Hsiang Chang, Chi-Ping Huang, Wen-Jeng Wu, Ching-Chia Li, Chung-Hsin Chen, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chi-Wen Lo, Chih-Chin Yu, Chung-You Tsai, Wei-Che Wu, Jen-Shu Tseng, Wun-Rong Lin, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu-Khun Lee, Yeong-Chin Jou, Ian-Seng C
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study
    Hoyoung Bae, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Hyun Hwan Sung
    Cancers.2022; 14(10): 2497.     CrossRef
  • Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
    Radosław Piszczek, Łukasz Nowak, Wojciech Krajewski, Joanna Chorbińska, Sławomir Poletajew, Marco Moschini, Krzysztof Kaliszewski, Romuald Zdrojowy
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta‐analysis
    Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang
    International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED: Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma
    Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Ja Hyeon Ku, Seok Ho Kang, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Isaac Yi Kim
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0255965.     CrossRef
  • Risk factor analysis of intravesical recurrence after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
    Masato Yanagi, Tsutomu Hamasaki, Jun Akatsuka, Yuki Endo, Hayato Takeda, Yukihiro Kondo
    BMC Urology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an interdisciplinary collaboration between urology and radiology
    Jacob L. Roberts, Fady Ghali, Lejla Aganovic, Seth Bechis, Kelly Healy, Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz, Riccardo Autorino, Ithaar Derweesh
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(12): 3893.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wen Liu, Lijiang Sun, Fengju Guan, Fangming Wang, Guiming Zhang
    Disease Markers.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • 7,806 View
  • 180 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
Tae Heon Kim, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Seok Ho Kang, Ja Hyeon Ku, Byong Chang Jeong, on behalf of Urothelial Cancer-Advanced Research and Treatment (UCART) Study Group
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):240-251.   Published online April 24, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU).
Materials and Methods
Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model.
Results
A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic effects of different nephroureterectomy techniques for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis
    Huan Wen, Yu Zhou, Lin Yang
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis
    Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Nicholas Corsi, Ivan Rakic, Alex Stephens, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Marco Finati, Matthew Davis, Shane Tinsley, Akshay Sood, Nicolò Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Cr
    BJU International.2024; 133(5): 555.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study
    Hoyoung Bae, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Hyun Hwan Sung
    Cancers.2022; 14(10): 2497.     CrossRef
  • Impact of pathological factors on survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gopal Sharma, Anuj Kumar Yadav, Tarun Pareek, Pawan Kaundal, Shantanu Tyagi, Sudheer Kumar Devana, Shrawan Kumar Singh
    International braz j urol.2022; 48(3): 406.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta‐analysis
    Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang
    International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED: Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma
    Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Ja Hyeon Ku, Seok Ho Kang, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Isaac Yi Kim
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0255965.     CrossRef
  • Unusual presentation of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan: Direct comparison from Taiwan‐Japan UTUC Collaboration Cohort
    Hao Lun Luo, Chikara Ohyama, Shingo Hatakeyama, Hung Jen Wang, Tohru Yoneyama, Wen Chou Yang, Yao Chi Chuang, Yen Ta Chen, Wei Chin Lee, Yuan Tso Cheng, Chih Hsiung Kang, Po Hui Chiang
    International Journal of Urology.2020; 27(4): 327.     CrossRef
  • Concomitant carcinoma in situ as a prognostic factor in the upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoshuai Gao, Yucheng Ma, Guo Chen, Jixiang Chen, Hao Li, Hong Li, Xin Wei, Kunjie Wang
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2020; 38(6): 574.     CrossRef
  • Transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse disease progression than retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
    Tae Heon Kim, Yoon Seok Suh, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Han Yong Choi, Hyun Hwan Sung
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an interdisciplinary collaboration between urology and radiology
    Jacob L. Roberts, Fady Ghali, Lejla Aganovic, Seth Bechis, Kelly Healy, Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz, Riccardo Autorino, Ithaar Derweesh
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(12): 3893.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wen Liu, Lijiang Sun, Fengju Guan, Fangming Wang, Guiming Zhang
    Disease Markers.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • 8,696 View
  • 212 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP