Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

Active and Passive Smoking, BRAF^V600E Mutation Status, and the Risk of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Large-Scale Case-Control and Case-Only Study: Kyoung-Nam Kim, Yunji Hwang, Kyungsik Kim, Kyu Eun Lee, Young Joo Park, June Young Choi, Do Joon Park, BeLong Cho, Daehee Kang, Sue K. Park; Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1392-1399. Published online February 20, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.612

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
The association between tobacco smoking and thyroid cancer remains uncertain. We evaluated the associations of active and passive smokingwith the risk of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), the most common type of thyroid cancer, and with the BRAFV600E mutation, the most common oncogenic mutation in PTC related to poor prognosis.
Materials and Methods
We conducted this study with newly diagnosed PTC patients (n=2,142) and community controls (n=21,420) individually matched to cases for age and sex. Information on active and passive smoking and potential confounders were obtained from structured questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, and medical records. BRAF^V600E mutation status was assessed in PTC patients. We evaluated the associations of active and passive smoking with PTC and BRAF^V600E mutation risk using conditional and unconditional logistic regression models, respectively.
Results
We did not find associations between exposure indices of active and passive smoking and PTC risk in both men and women, except for the association between current smoking and lower PTC risk. Cumulative smoking ≥ 20 pack-years was associated with lower BRAFV600E mutation risk in male PTC patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 1.00). The CI for the association was wider in female PTC patients (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.02 to 2.62), possibly owing to a smaller sample size in this stratum.
Conclusion
We did not find consistent associations between active and passive smoking and PTC risk. Cumulative smoking ≥ 20 pack-years was associated with lower BRAFV600E mutation risk in male PTC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Geographic variation in the association between Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and Papillary thyroid carcinoma, a meta-analysis
Nabil W. G. Sweis, Ayman A. Zayed, Mira Al Jaberi, Lina AlQirem, Tala Basheer Hyasat, Farah A. Khraisat, Ward Maaita, Ahmad Moayad Naser, Abdullah Nimer, Mamoon Qatamin, Jaleel J. G. Sweis, Nadia Sweis, Abdallah T. Al-Ani, Ahmad M. Alghrabli, Alireza Hagh
Endocrine.2023; 81(3): 432. CrossRef
Sex-specific Associations between Body Mass Index and Thyroid Cancer Incidence among Korean Adults
Kyoung-Nam Kim, Kyungsik Kim, Sangjun Lee, Sue K. Park
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2023; 32(9): 1227. CrossRef
Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Thyroid Cancer: Meta-Analysis
Joon-Hyop Lee, Young Jun Chai, Ka Hee Yi
Endocrinology and Metabolism.2021; 36(3): 590. CrossRef
Tobacco smoking and risk of thyroid cancer according to BRAFV600E mutational subtypes
Sabbir T. Rahman, Nirmala Pandeya, Rachel E. Neale, Donald S. A. McLeod, Peter D. Baade, Philippa H. Youl, Roger Allison, Susan Leonard, Susan J. Jordan
Clinical Endocrinology.2021; 95(6): 891. CrossRef
circFAT1(e2) Promotes Papillary Thyroid Cancer Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion via the miRNA-873/ZEB1 Axis
Jiazhe Liu, Hongchang Li, Chuanchao Wei, Junbin Ding, Jingfeng Lu, Gaofeng Pan, Anwei Mao, Tao Huang
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef

6,301 View
187 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Public Perceptions on Cancer Incidence and Survival: A Nation-wide Survey in Korea: Soyeun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyung Kook Yang, So Young Kim, Young-Jin Ko, BeLong Cho, Young Sung Lee, Dukhyoung Lee, Keeho Park, Jong Hyock Park; Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):775-788. Published online May 26, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.369

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the public perceptions of the incidence rates and survival rates for common cancers with the actual rates from epidemiologic data.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a survey of Korean adults without history of cancer (n=2,000). The survey consisted of questions about their perceptions regarding lifetime incidence rates and 5-year survival rates for total cancer, as well as those of eight site-specific cancers. To investigate associated factors, we included questions about cancer worry (Lerman’s Cancer Worry Scale) or cared for a family member or friend with cancer as a caregiver.
Results
Only 19% of Korean adults had an accurate perception of incidence rates compared with the epidemiologic data on total cancer. For specific cancers, most of the respondents overestimated the incidence rates and 10%-30% of men and 6%-18% of women had an accurate perception. A high score in “cancer worry” was associated with higher estimates of incidence rates in total and specific cancers. In cancers with high actual 5-year survival rates (e.g., breast and thyroid), the majority of respondents underestimated survival rates. However, about 50% of respondents overestimated survival rates in cancers with low actual survival rates (e.g., lung and liver). There was no factor consistently associated with perceived survival rates.
Conclusion
Widespread discrepancies were observed between perceived probability and actual epidemiological data. In order to reduce cancer worry and to increase health literacy, communication and patient education on appropriate risk is needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The correlation between individuals’ attitudes toward cancer screening, cancer information overload, and healthy life awareness: a cross-sectional study
Melike Demir Doğan, Seda Kurt, Berkay Ertin
Journal of Public Health.2024; 32(5): 759. CrossRef
Assessing Fear of Thyroid Cancer in the General U.S. Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
Stephanie R. Taylor, Alexander Chiu, Ines Hoxha, Megan C. Saucke, Catherine B. Jensen, Susan C. Pitt
Thyroid®.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Chasm between Public Perceptions and Epidemiological Data on Colorectal Cancer
Su Bee Park, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha
Gut and Liver.2023; 17(3): 449. CrossRef
A Web-Based Decision Aid for Informed Prostate Cancer Screening: Development and Pilot Evaluation
Wonyoung Jung, In Young Cho, Keun Hye Jeon, Yohwan Yeo, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Ansuk Jeong, Jungkwon Lee, Dong Wook Shin
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Barriers and Challenges to Cervical Cancer Screening, Follow.Up, and Prevention Measures among Korean Immigrant Women in Hawaii
Eurina Y Cha, Hans Chun
Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 8(2): 132. CrossRef
Health-Related Quality of Life, Perceived Social Support, and Depression in Disease-Free Survivors Who Underwent Curative Surgery Only for Prostate, Kidney and Bladder Cancer: Comparison among Survivors and with the General Population
Dong Wook Shin, Hyun Sik Park, Sang Hyub Lee, Seung Hyun Jeon, Seok Cho, Seok Ho Kang, Seung Chol Park, Jong Hyock Park, Jinsung Park
Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 289. CrossRef
Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Dong Wook Shin, Sang Hyub Lee, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Joong Yun, Jong Kil Nam, Seung Hyun Jeon, Seung Chol Park, Seung Il Jung, Jong-Hyock Park, Jinsung Park
Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(2): 556. CrossRef
A phase II study of oxaliplatin and prednisone for patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma trial
Sung Yong Oh, Won Seog Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Yee Soo Chae, Gyeong-Won Lee, Hyeon Seok Eom, Hun Mo Ryoo, Suee Lee, Seok Jin Kim, Dok Hyun Yoon, Jong Ho Won, Junshik Hong, Jinny Park, Sang-Min Lee, Jung Yong Hong, Eunkyung Park, Hyo Jung Kim, Deok-Hwan Yang, H
Leukemia & Lymphoma.2016; 57(6): 1406. CrossRef
News Portrayal of Cancer: Content Analysis of Threat and Efficacy by Cancer Type and Comparison with Incidence and Mortality in Korea
Minsun Shim, Yong-Chan Kim, Su Yeon Kye, Keeho Park
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2016; 31(8): 1231. CrossRef
The Workplace Experiences of Breast Cancer Survivors: A Survey of an Online Community
Ka Ryeong Bae, Sun Young Kwon
Asian Oncology Nursing.2016; 16(4): 208. CrossRef

12,780 View
130 Download
11 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer: A Dyadic Examination: Dong Wook Shin, Jooyeon Shin, So Young Kim, Hyung-Kook Yang, Juhee Cho, Jung Ho Youm, Gyu Seog Choi, Nam Soo Hong, BeLong Cho, Jong-Hyock Park; Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):384-392. Published online March 13, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.280

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
This study aimed to examine the following questions: to what extent do patients and caregivers perceive their family members to be avoidant of communication regarding patient’s cancer, and to what extent do these perceptions interrelate; and how do such perceptions influence their own and each other’s communication behaviors, communication outcome, mental health, and quality of life. Materials and Methods A national survey was performed with 990 patient-caregiver dyads (participation rate, 76.2%). To examine the dyadic interaction, we developed linked patient and family member questionnaires, including the Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer (FACC) scale. Results The mean scores (standard deviations) of patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were low at 10.9 (15.5) and 15.5 (17.5), respectively (p < 0.001), and concordance was low, a well (Spearman’s rho, 0.23). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with lower levels of disclosure and behaviors of holding back communication, as well as lower levels of mental health outcome and quality of life. The same was true for caregivers (all p < 0.05). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with caregiver holding back, caregiver’s depression level, and caregiver quality of life (all p < 0.05). Both patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were independently associated with communication difficulty within the family. Conclusion Future research would benefit from the measurement of FACC from both patients and caregivers, and promote family intervention to enhance openness to communication, which would be helpful for improving mental health and quality of life for both patients and caregivers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Dyadic association between mindfulness, family avoidance of communication about cancer and fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer couples: A cross-sectional study
Xiangyu Zhao, Yunxue Zhang, Rui Qin, Guopeng Li, Xudong He, Xiaona Shen, Ping Li
European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 68: 102491. CrossRef
Caring for a Parent With a Blood Cancer: Sibling Communication Challenges and Psychosocial Outcomes
Kevin B. Wright, Carma L. Bylund, Diliara Bagautdinova, Chelsea N. Hampton, Gemme Campbell-Salome, Elisa S. Weiss, Maria Sae-Hau, Carla L. Fisher
Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A qualitative study
Ye Zhou, Chong Chin Che, Mei Chan Chong, Yuzhu Hou, Xiangqun Xiao, Yun Liu, Haiyan Zhao
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Cancer Caregivers’ Prognostic and End-of-Life Communication Needs and Experiences and their Impact
Anny T.H.R. Fenton, Kalen M. Fletcher, Deniz Kizildag, Nancy A. Borstelmann, Daniela Kessler, Christine Cronin, Anna C. Revette, Alexi A. Wright, Elizabeth Frank, Andrea C. Enzinger
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2023; 65(1): 16. CrossRef
Relationships Among Perceived Social Support, Family Resilience, and Caregiver Burden in Lung Cancer Families: A Mediating Model
Yalin Zhang, Yuxin Ding, Chunhua Liu, Juejin Li, Qi Wang, Yunhuan Li, Xiaolin Hu
Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2023; 39(3): 151356. CrossRef
Exploring Dyad-Based Communication During Cancer
Martha E. Francis, Pranshu Mohindra, Kim Mooney-Doyle
Cancer Nursing.2023; 46(6): E384. CrossRef
Contributors to well‐being of Chinese left‐behind families: A dyadic perspective from family resilience and grandparent–grandchild relationship
Qiong Hu, Yanlin Zhou, Peiqi Dong, Cihua Xu, Qiong Zhang
Child & Family Social Work.2023; 28(3): 646. CrossRef
The perception of life and death in patients with end-of-life stage cancer: A systematic review of qualitative research
Ayumi Kyota, Kiyoko Kanda, Maiko Senuma, Noriko Tsukagoshi, Tamae Futawatari, Yuka Kondo
European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 66: 102354. CrossRef
Communication with cancer patients: the perspective of caregivers versus non-caregivers in Iran
Azam Naghavi, Samaneh Salimi, Winfried Rief, Pia von Blanckenburg
Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative context: A mixed‐method study
Yalin Zhang, Shu Zhang, Chunhua Liu, Xiaoli Chen, Yuxin Ding, Chang Guan, Xiaolin Hu
Journal of Clinical Nursing.2023; 32(21-22): 7751. CrossRef
Distinct dyadic quality of life profiles among patient-caregiver dyads with advanced lung cancer: a latent profile analysis
Hui Wang, Tiantian Deng, Cong Cao, Danjun Feng
Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Family communication and coping among racial‐ethnic minority cancer patients: A systematic review
Yu‐Ju Huang, Chiara Acquati, Monit Cheung
Health & Social Care in the Community.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Barriers to seeking psychosocial support among adult patients with hematologic neoplasms: a qualitative study
Mengting Xie, Chunfeng Wang, Jingyi Chen, Ying Wang, Xiaoxia Wu, Yong Wu, Rong Hu
Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(3): 2613. CrossRef
Openness and topic avoidance in interpersonal communication about ovarian cancer: An uncertainty management perspective
Dinah A. Tetteh, Najma Akhther
Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer—refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample
Natasha Michael, Alex Gorelik, Ekavi Georgousopoulou, Merlina Sulistio, Patrick Tee, Katherine Hauser, David Kissane
Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(9): 7387. CrossRef
The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol
Clizia Cincidda, Serena Oliveri, Virginia Sanchini, Gabriella Pravettoni
Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of a dyadic intervention to improve communication between patients with cancer and their caregivers: A randomized pilot trial
Julien Tiete, Nicole Delvaux, Aurore Liénard, Darius Razavi
Patient Education and Counseling.2021; 104(3): 563. CrossRef
Hostility in cancer patients as an underexplored facet of distress
Luigi Grassi, Martino Belvederi Murri, Michelle Riba, Silvia de Padova, Tatiana Bertelli, Silvana Sabato, Maria Giulia Nanni, Rosangela Caruso, Heifa Ounalli, Luigi Zerbinati
Psycho-Oncology.2021; 30(4): 493. CrossRef
Effects of family participatory dignity therapy on the psychological well-being and family function of patients with haematologic malignancies and their family caregivers: A randomised controlled trial
Chunfeng Wang, Jingyi Chen, Ying Wang, Wenkui Xu, Mengting Xie, Yong Wu, Rong Hu
International Journal of Nursing Studies.2021; 118: 103922. CrossRef
The effect of death anxiety in nurses on their approach to dying patients: A cross‐sectional study
Adalet Üstükuş, Zehra Eskimez
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care.2021; 57(4): 1929. CrossRef
Dyadic effects of family-functioning and resilience on quality of life in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model
Hui Wang, Haorun Yue, Minmin Ren, Danjun Feng
European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 52: 101963. CrossRef
Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy
Claire C Conley, Amy K Otto, Glynnis A McDonnell, Kenneth P Tercyak
Translational Behavioral Medicine.2021; 11(11): 2018. CrossRef
The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers
Tess Thompson, Dana Ketcher, Tamryn F. Gray, Erin E. Kent
Social Science & Medicine.2021; 287: 114357. CrossRef
The Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI) scale: psychometric assessment in women treated for cancer
Elizabeth K. Arthur, Celia E. Wills, Kristine Browning, Janine Overcash, Usha Menon
Supportive Care in Cancer.2020; 28(3): 1449. CrossRef
The Critical Need to Recognize That Families Matter for Adult Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Sarah B. Woods, Kate Bridges, Erica N. Carpenter
Family Process.2020; 59(4): 1608. CrossRef
Family Communication Patterns and Challenges of Huntington’s Disease Risk, the Decision to Pursue Presymptomatic Testing, and Test Results
Kelsey Stuttgen, Juli Bollinger, Allison McCague, Rachel Dvoskin, Debra Mathews
Journal of Huntington's Disease.2020; 9(3): 265. CrossRef
Open communication between caregivers’ and terminally ill cancer patients about illness and death: The role of gender - A correlational study
Sara Carmel, Yoram Singer, Nili Yosef-Sela, Yaacov G. Bachner
European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2020; 49: 101828. CrossRef
Patient-family communication mediates the relation between family hardiness and caregiver positivity: Exploring the moderating role of caregiver depression and anxiety
Joo Yeon Shin, Michael F. Steger, Dong Wook Shin, So Young Kim, Hyung-Kook Yang, Juhee Cho, Ansuk Jeong, Keeho Park, Sun Seog Kweon, Jong-Hyock Park
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2019; 37(5): 557. CrossRef
Reports of Sharing and Withholding Cancer-Related Information by Patients With Gynecologic Cancer and Their Supporters
Maria Checton, Maria Venetis, Danielle Catona, Allyson Bontempo, Kathryn Greene, Alexandre de Meritens, Katie Devine
Oncology Nursing Forum.2019; 46(6): 676. CrossRef
Family Members’ Experiences With Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation
Nicole DePasquale, Ashley Cabacungan, Patti L. Ephraim, LaPricia Lewis-Boyér, Neil R. Powe, L. Ebony Boulware
Kidney Medicine.2019; 1(4): 171. CrossRef
The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy
Caroline S. Dorfman, Eneka Lamb, Alyssa Van Denburg, Anava A. Wren, Mary Scott Soo, Kaylee Faircloth, Vicky Gandhi, Rebecca A. Shelby
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2018; 36(2): 222. CrossRef
Underestimated caregiver burden by cancer patients and its association with quality of life, depression and anxiety among caregivers
J.Y. Shin, J.-W. Lim, D.W. Shin, S.Y. Kim, H.-K. Yang, J. Cho, A. Jeong, D. Jo, C.-Y. Yim, K. Park, J.-H. Park
European Journal of Cancer Care.2018; 27(2): e12814. CrossRef
The Dyadic Effects of Family Cohesion and Communication on Health-Related Quality of Life: The Moderating Role of Sex
Jung-won Lim, En-jung Shon
Cancer Nursing.2018; 41(2): 156. CrossRef

12,405 View
132 Download
34 Web of Science
33 Crossref

Oncologists’ Experience with Patients with Second Primary Cancer and the Attitudes toward Second Primary Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Survey: Dong Wook Shin, Juhee Cho, Hyung Kook Yang, So Young Kim, Boram Park, BeLong Cho, Hyung Jin Kim, Young Jun Lee, Deog-Yeon Jo, Jong Hyock Park; Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):600-606. Published online February 12, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.162

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
Screening for second primary cancer (SPC) is one of the key components to survivorship care. We aim to evaluate the oncologists’ experience with SPCs and assess the current practice, perceived barriers, and recommendations related to SPC screening. Materials and Methods A nationwide survey was conducted with a representative sample of 496 Korean oncologists. A questionnaire based on the findings from our previous qualitative study was administered. Results More than three-fourths of oncologists (76.3%), who participated in the study, had experience with SPC patients. Over half of them (51.9%) stated that it was an embarrassing experience. While the current management practice for SPC varies, most oncologists (80.2%) agreed on the necessity in proactively providing information on SPC screening. A short consultation time (52.3%), lack of guidelines and evidence on SPC screening (47.7%), and patients’ lack of knowledge about SPCs (45.1%) or SPC screening (41.4%) were most frequently reported as barriers to providing appropriate care for managing SPC. Oncologists recommended the development of specific screening programs or guidelines in accordance to the type of primary cancer (65.9%), the development of an internal system for SPC screening within the hospital (59.7%) or systematic connection with the national cancer screening program (44.3%), and education of oncologists (41.4%) as well as patients (48.9%) regarding SPC screening. Conclusion Many oncologists reported the occurrence of SPC as an embarrassing experience. Given the variations in current practice and the lack of consensus, further studies are warranted to develop the optimal clinical strategy to provide SPC screening for cancer survivors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cardiovascular risk and undertreatment of dyslipidemia in lung cancer survivors: A nationwide population-based study
In Young Cho, Kyungdo Han, Dong Wook Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Dong Woog Yoon, Sujeong Shin, Su-Min Jeong, Jong Ho Cho
Current Problems in Cancer.2021; 45(1): 100615. CrossRef
Developing an instrument to assess cancer patient preparedness for transition to survivorship care in Korea
Jung‐won Lim
Asian Social Work and Policy Review.2020; 14(3): 172. CrossRef
Second Primary Cancer after Treating Gastrointestinal Cancer
Jeong Youp Park
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 74(4): 193. CrossRef
A national survey of lung cancer specialists’ views on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in Korea
Dong Wook Shin, Sohyun Chun, Young Il Kim, Seung Joon Kim, Jung Soo Kim, SeMin Chong, Young Sik Park, Sang-Yun Song, Jin Han Lee, Hee Kyung Ahn, Eun Young Kim, Sei Hoon Yang, Myoung Kyu Lee, Deog Gon Cho, Tae Won Jang, Ji Woong Son, Jeong-Seon Ryu, Moon-J
PLOS ONE.2018; 13(2): e0192626. CrossRef
The Dyadic Effects of Family Cohesion and Communication on Health-Related Quality of Life: The Moderating Role of Sex
Jung-won Lim, En-jung Shon
Cancer Nursing.2018; 41(2): 156. CrossRef
Physicians’ attitudes towards the media and peer-review selection of the ‘best cancer doctor’: comparison of two different selection methods
Dong Wook Shin, Juhee Cho, Hyung Kook Yang, So Young Kim, Soohyeon Lee, Eun Joo Nam, Joo Seop Chung, Jeong-Soo Im, Keeho Park, Jong Hyock Park
BMJ Open.2018; 8(5): e019067. CrossRef

10,176 View
91 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search