Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Ah Ram Chang"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Breast cancer
Locoregional Recurrence in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study (KROG 22-14)
Sang Min Lee, Bum-Sup Jang, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Ho Song, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, In Ah Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Sung-Ja Ahn, Kyubo Kim, Ah Ram Chang, Jeanny Kwon, Hae Jin Park, Kyung Hwan Shin
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(1):150-158.   Published online July 12, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.201
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aims to evaluate the treatment approaches and locoregional patterns for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in the breast, which is an uncommon malignant tumor with limited clinical data.
Materials and Methods
A total of 93 patients diagnosed with primary ACC in the breast between 1992 and 2022 were collected from multi-institutions. All patients underwent surgical resection, including breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or total mastectomy (TM). Recurrence patterns and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed.
Results
Seventy-five patients (80.7%) underwent BCS, and 71 of them (94.7%) received post-operative radiation therapy (PORT). Eighteen patients (19.3%) underwent TM, with five of them (27.8%) also receiving PORT. With a median follow-up of 50 months, the LRFS rate was 84.2% at 5 years. Local recurrence (LR) was observed in five patients (5.4%) and four cases (80%) of the LR occurred in the tumor bed. Three of LR (3/75, 4.0%) had a history of BCS and PORT, meanwhile, two of LR (2/18, 11.1%) had a history of mastectomy. Regional recurrence occurred in two patients (2.2%), and both cases had a history of PORT with (n=1) and without (n=1) irradiation of the regional lymph nodes. Partial breast irradiation (p=0.35), BCS (p=0.96) and PORT in BCS group (p=0.33) had no significant association with LRFS.
Conclusion
BCS followed by PORT was the predominant treatment approach for ACC of the breast and LR mostly occurred in the tumor bed. The findings of this study suggest that partial breast irradiation might be considered for PORT in primary breast ACC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast: A Narrative Review and Update on Management
    Taylor Neilson, Zaibo Li, Christina Minami, Sara P. Myers
    Cancers.2025; 17(7): 1079.     CrossRef
  • Rare hepatic metastasis in classical adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: A case report
    Xiaohui Huang, Yangjing Ou, Lin Tang, Wei Zhou, Taoli Wang, Miduo Tan
    Oncology Letters.2025; 30(5): 1.     CrossRef
  • 3,293 View
  • 164 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
General
Radiation Oncologists’ Perspectives on Oligometastatic Disease: A Korean Survey Study
Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Jong Hoon Lee, Young Seok Kim, Yang-Gun Suh, Kyung Hwan Kim, Ah Ram Chang, Eui Kyu Chie, Yong Chan Ahn, on behalf of the Oligometastasis Working Group, Korean Cancer Association
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(2):414-421.   Published online November 22, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.876
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Perspectives of radiation oncologists on oligometastatic disease was investigated using multi-layered survey.
Materials and Methods
Online survey on the oligometastatic disease was distributed to the board-certified regular members of the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology. The questionnaire consisted of four domains: five questions on demographics; five on the definition of oligometastatic disease; four on the role of local therapy; and three on the oligometastatic disease classification, respectively.
Results
A total of 135 radiation oncologists participated in the survey. The median length of practice after board certification was 22.5 years (range, 1 to 44 years), and the vast majority (94.1%) answered affirmatively to the clinical experience in oligometastatic disease management. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents considered the number of involved organs as an independent factor in defining oligometastasis. Most frequently perceived upper limit on the numerical definition of oligometastasis was 5 (64.2%), followed by 3 (26.0%), respectively. Peritoneal and brain metastasis were nominated as the sites to be excluded from oligometastastic disease by 56.3% and 12.6% of the participants, respectively. Vast majority (82.1%) agreed on the role of local treatment in the management of oligometastatic disease. Majority (72%) of the participants acknowledged the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)–European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification of oligometastatic disease, however, only 43.3% answered that they applied this classification in their clinical practice. Underlying reasons against the clinical use were ‘too complicated’ (66.0%), followed by ‘insufficient supporting evidence’ (30.0%), respectively.
Conclusion
While most radiation oncologists supported the role of local therapy in oligometastatic disease, there were several inconsistencies in defining and categorizing oligometastatic disease. Continued education and training on oligometastatic disease would be also required to build consensus among participating caregivers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy Analysis of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Tumors: A Retrospective Study
    Qian Sun, Hanqing Zhao, Xianwen Zhang, Suli Zhang, Zelai He, Gengming Wang, Hao Jiang, Aili Xuan, Xianming Li
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • ‘Perspectives of pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons on Oligometastatic disease: curability, treatment approaches, and disease trajectory’
    Damla Azaklı, Inanc Yazici, Aysegul Erinc, Celal Satici
    Future Oncology.2025; 21(15): 1849.     CrossRef
  • Expert consensus on radiotherapy for oligometastatic esophageal cancer (2025 edition)

    Radiation Medicine and Protection.2025; 6(3): 119.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Oligo-Recurrence and Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Dai Sonoda, Yasuto Kondo, Satoru Tamagawa, Masahito Naito, Masashi Mikubo, Kazu Shiomi, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Yukitoshi Satoh
    Cancers.2025; 17(14): 2293.     CrossRef
  • A new proposal of simplified classification of non-small cell lung cancer oligometastases for easy applicability through systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation
    Hanseung Kang, Woohyeon Do, Yong Chan Ahn, Eui Kyu Chie, Chai Hong Rim
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 212: 115043.     CrossRef
  • 4,563 View
  • 159 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Risk Factors for Distant Metastasis in Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer after Curative Resection (KROG 1814)
Younghee Park, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyubo Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Wonguen Jung, Jinsil Seong, Woo Chul Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Ah Ram Chang, Bae Kwon Jeong, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Tae Gyu Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Hae Jin Park, Hyun Soo Shin, Jung Ho Im, Eui Kyu Chie
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):272-279.   Published online July 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.616
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Risk factors predicting distant metastasis (DM) in extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC) patients treated with curative resection were investigated.
Materials and Methods
Medical records of 1,418 EHBDC patients undergoing curative resection between Jan 2000 and Dec 2015 from 14 institutions were reviewed. After resection, 924 patients (67.6%) were surveilled without adjuvant therapy, 297 (21.7%) were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and 148 (10.8%) with CCRT followed by chemotherapy. To exclude the treatment effect from innate confounders, patients not treated with adjuvant therapy were evaluated.
Results
After a median follow-up of 36.7 months (range, 2.7 to 213.2 months), the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate was 57.7%. On multivariate analysis, perihilar or diffuse tumor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.391; p=0.004), poorly differentiated histology (HR, 2.014; p < 0.001), presence of perineural invasion (HR, 1.768; p < 0.001), positive nodal metastasis (HR, 2.670; p < 0.001) and preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≥ 37 U/mL (HR, 1.353; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with inferior DMFS. The DMFS rates significantly differed according to the number of these risk factors. For validation, patients who underwent adjuvant therapy were evaluated. In patients with ≥ 3 factors, additional chemotherapy after CCRT resulted in a superior DMFS compared with CCRT alone (5-year rate, 47.6% vs. 27.7%; p=0.001), but the benefit of additional chemotherapy was not observed in patients with 0-2 risk factors.
Conclusion
Tumor location, histologic differentiation, perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, and preoperative CA 19-9 level predicted DM risk in resected EHBDC. These risk factors might help identifying a subset of patients who could benefit from additional chemotherapy after resection.
  • 4,454 View
  • 200 Download
Close layer
Differential Perspectives by Specialty on Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Korean Oligometastasis Working Group’s Comparative Survey Study
Won Kyung Cho, Gyu Sang Yoo, Chai Hong Rim, Jae-Uk Jeong, Eui Kyu Chie, Yong Chan Ahn, Hyeon-Min Cho, Jun Won Um, Yang-Gun Suh, Ah Ram Chang, Jong Hoon Lee, On behalf of the Oligometastasis Working Group, Korean Cancer Association
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1281-1290.   Published online June 7, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.479
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Despite numerous studies on the optimal treatments for oligometastatic disease (OMD), there is no established interdisciplinary consensus on its diagnosis or classification. This survey-based study aimed to analyze the differential opinions of colorectal surgeons and radiation oncologists regarding the definition and treatment of OMD from the colorectal primary.
Materials and Methods
A total of 141 participants were included in this study, consisting of 63 radiation oncologists (44.7%) and 78 colorectal surgeons (55.3%). The survey consisted of 19 questions related to OMD, and the responses were analyzed using the chi-square test to determine statistical differences between the specialties.
Results
The radiation oncologists chose “bone” more frequently compared to the colorectal surgeons (19.2% vs. 36.5%, p=0.022), while colorectal surgeons favored “peritoneal seeding” (26.9% vs. 9.5%, p=0.009). Regarding the number of metastatic tumors, 48.3% of colorectal surgeons responded that “irrelevant, if all metastatic lesions are amendable to local therapy”, while only 21.8% of radiation oncologist chose same answer. When asked about molecular diagnosis, most surgeons (74.8%) said it was important, but only 35.8% of radiation oncologists agreed.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that although radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons agreed on a majority of aspects such as diagnostic imaging, biomarker, systemic therapy, and optimal timing of OMD, they also had quite different perspectives on several aspects of OMD. Understanding these differences is crucial to achieving multidisciplinary consensus on the definition and optimal management of OMD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Barriers in Oligometastasis Care in Korea: Radiation Oncologists’ Perspectives
    Eui Kyu Chie, Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Yong Chan Ahn
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1063.     CrossRef
  • 4,636 View
  • 181 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Retrospective Analysis of the Treatment Results for Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Tonsil
Ah Ram Chang, Hong-Gyun Wu, Charn Il Park, Kwang-Hyun Kim, Myung-Whun Sung, Dae-Seog Heo
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(2):92-97.   Published online April 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.2.92
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

There has been no definitive randomized study to identify the optimal therapeutic regimen for treating squamous cell carcinoma of tonsil. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcome according to various combinations of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-six patients with tonsillar carcinoma, who were treated at Seoul National University Hospital from March 1985 to August 2001, were the subjects of this study. Twenty-one patients received surgery followed by radiation therapy (SRT), 16 patients underwent radiation therapy alone (RT), and 19 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). The median radiation dose was 66.6 Gy for the SRT group and 70.2 Gy for the RT and CRT groups. Surgery comprised extended tonsillectomy and modified radical neck dissection of the involved neck. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were used every three weeks for 3 cycles in the SRT group. The median follow-up was 73.2 months.

Results

The distribution of T-stage was 4 cases of T1, 14 cases of T2, 1 case of T3 and 2 cases of T4 staging in the SRT group, 2 cases of T1, 6 cases of T2, 5 cases of T3 and 3 cases of T4 staging in the RT group and 0 cases of T1, 7 cases of T2, 9 cases of T3 and 3 cases of T4 staging in the CRT group. The distribution of N-stage was 5 cases of N0, 2 cases of N1, 13 cases of N2 and 1 case of N3 staging in the SRT group, 6 cases of N0, 5 cases of N1, 5 cases of N2 and 0 cases of N3 staging in the RT group, and 2 cases of N0, and 7 cases of N1, 9 cases of N2 and 1 case of N3 staging in the CRT group. The five-year overall survival rate (OSR) for all patients was 78%. The five-year OSR was 80% for the SRT group, 71% for the RT group, and 80% for the CRT group (p=ns). The five-year disease-free survival rate was 93% for the CRT group and 71% for the RT group (p=0.017). Four patients developed local failure and one patient failed at a regional site in the RT group, and one patient failed at a primary site in the CRT group. The five-year DFS was 84% for patients who had undergone neck dissection and 76% for patients who had not undergone neck dissection (p=ns). Treatment-related complications of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 15 patients, and the incidence of complication was not different between each of the treatment methods.

Conclusion

Although the patients with more advanced T stage were included in the RT and CRT groups, the OSR was not statistically different according to the treatment methods. In the radical radiation therapy group, the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed an improvement in the disease-free survival. Because of the retrospective nature of our study and the small number of patients, this study cannot draw any definite conclusions, but it suggests that radiation therapy with chemotherapy can be a good alternative option for squamous cell carcinoma of tonsil. Controlled randomized study is necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term results of ipsilateral radiotherapy for tonsil cancer
    Tae Ryool Koo, Hong-Gyun Wu
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2013; 31(2): 66.     CrossRef
  • Definitive Radiotherapy versus Postoperative Radiotherapy for Tonsil Cancer
    Tae Ryool Koo, Hong-Gyun Wu, J. Hun Hah, Myung-Whun Sung, Kwang-Hyun Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Tae Min Kim, Se-Hoon Lee, Dong-Wan Kim, Dae-Seog Heo, Charn Il Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2012; 44(4): 227.     CrossRef
  • Treatment outcome in the residually positive neck after definitive chemotherapy and irradiation
    Laura M. Dooley, Kevin L. Potts, Liz D. Wilson, Zachary J. Cappello, Jeffrey M. Bumpous
    The Laryngoscope.2011; 121(8): 1656.     CrossRef
  • EGFR mutations and human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and tonsil
    Im Il Na, Hye Jin Kang, Soo Youn Cho, Jae Soo Koh, Jin Kyung Lee, Byeong Cheol Lee, Guk Haeng Lee, Yong Sik Lee, Hyung Jun Yoo, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Sung Hyun Yang, Yoon Sang Shim
    European Journal of Cancer.2007; 43(3): 520.     CrossRef
  • 11,373 View
  • 47 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP