Cancer Research and Treatment

Woochul Noh

1 Article

Education Level Is a Strong Prognosticator in the Subgroup Aged More Than 50 Years Regardless of the Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer: A Study Based on the Nationwide Korean Breast Cancer Registry Database: Ki-Tae Hwang, Woochul Noh, Se-Heon Cho, Jonghan Yu, Min Ho Park, Joon Jeong, Hyouk Jin Lee, Jongjin Kim, Sohee Oh, Young A Kim, Korean Breast Cancer Society; Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):1114-1126. Published online February 2, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.528

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
This study investigated the role of the education level (EL) as a prognostic factor for breast cancer and analyzed the relationship between the EL and various confounding factors.
Materials and Methods
The data for 64,129 primary breast cancer patients from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry were analyzed. The EL was classified into two groups according to the education period; the high EL group (≥ 12 years) and low EL group (< 12 years). Survival analyses were performed with respect to the overall survival between the two groups.
Results
A high EL conferred a superior prognosis compared to a low EL in the subgroup aged > 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.626; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.577 to 0.678) but not in the subgroup aged ≤ 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.865 to 1.024). The EL was a significant independent factor in the subgroup aged > 50 years according to multivariate analyses. The high EL group showed more favorable clinicopathologic features and a higher proportion of patients in this group received lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and endocrine therapy. In the high EL group, a higher proportion of patients received chemotherapy in the subgroups with unfavorable clinicopathologic features. The EL was a significant prognosticator across all molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Conclusion
The EL is a strong independent prognostic factor for breast cancer in the subgroup aged > 50 years regardless of the molecular subtype, but not in the subgroup aged ≤ 50 years. Favorable clinicopathologic features and active treatments can explain the main causality of the superior prognosis in the high EL group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Risk factors for intensive care unit readmission after lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
Hye-Bin Kim, Sungwon Na, Hyo Chae Paik, Hyeji Joo, Jeongmin Kim
Acute and Critical Care.2021; 36(2): 99. CrossRef
Educational disparities in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival: Temporal trends and mediating effects of clinical factors
Wang‐Zhong Li, Guo‐Ying Liu, Shu‐Hui Lv, Sen‐Kui Xu, Hu Liang, Kui‐Yuan Liu, Meng‐Yun Qiang, Xi Chen, Xiang Guo, Xing Lv, Wei‐Xiong Xia, Yan‐Qun Xiang
Clinical and Translational Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Education level as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma
Limei Xu, Xiuju Wang, Xueyi Pan, Xiaotao Wang, Qing Wang, Bingyi Wu, Jiahui Cai, Ying Zhao, Lijuan Chen, Wuping Li, Juan Li
BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic influence of Korean public medical insurance system on breast cancer patients
Ki-Tae Hwang, Young Wook Ju, Young A Kim, Jongjin Kim, Sohee Oh, Jiwoong Jung, Young Jun Chai, In Sil Choi, So Won Oh
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2019; 96(2): 58. CrossRef

9,407 View
170 Download
5 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Author index