- Hematologic malignancy
-
Busulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) as Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High-Risk Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study bythe Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL)
-
Kyoung Ha Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Mark Lee, Hoon-Gu Kim, Young Rok Do, Yong Park, Sung Yong Oh, Ho-Jin Shin, Won Seog Kim, Seong Kyu Park, Jee Hyun Kong, Moo-Rim Park, Deok-Hwan Yang, Jae-Yong Kwak, Hye Jin Kang, Yeung-Chul Mun, Jong-Ho Won
-
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(1):304-313. Published online March 30, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.004
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF PubReader ePub
- Purpose
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard management for relapsed or high-risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). We reported the busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide (BuME) conditioning regimen was effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk NHL. Moreover, the busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCE) conditioning regimen has been used widely in ASCT for NHL. Therefore, based on these encouraging results, this randomized phase II multicenter trial compared the outcomes of BuME and BuCE as conditioning therapies for ASCT in patients with NHL.
Materials and Methods
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BuME (n=36) or BuCE (n=39). The BuME regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day, intravenously) administered on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m2 intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and melphalan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The BuCE regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Eleven patients (30.5%) in the BuME group and 13 patients (33.3%) in the BuCE group had disease progression or died. The 2-year PFS rate was 65.4% in the BuME group and 60.6% in the BuCE group (p=0.746). There were no non-relapse mortalities within 100 days after transplantation.
Conclusion
There were no significant differences in PFS between the two groups. Therefore, busulfan-based conditioning regimens, BuME and BuCE, may be important treatment substitutes for the BCNU-containing regimens.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - CEAC (oral semustine, etoposide, cytarabine and cyclophosphamide) vs BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning regimen of autologous stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a post-hoc, propensity score-match
Tao Wang, Ping Liu, Lili Xu, Lei Gao, Xiong Ni, Gusheng Tang, Li Chen, Jie Chen, Libing Wang, Yang Wang, Weijia Fu, Wenqin Yue, Na Liu, Ruobing Li, Guihua Lu, Yanrong Luo, Jianmin Yang
Annals of Hematology.2024; 103(2): 575. CrossRef
-
5,450
View
-
228
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
-
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Olanzapine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Results of the Korean South West Oncology Group (KSWOG) Study
-
So-Yeon Jeon, Hye Sook Han, Woo Kyun Bae, Moo-Rim Park, Hyeok Shim, Sang-Cheol Lee, Se-Il Go, Hwan Jung Yun, Yong-Jin Im, Eun-Kee Song
-
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):90-97. Published online February 27, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.577
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Purpose
Data on the efficacy of olanzapine in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of olanzapine versus placebo in controlling nausea and vomiting in patients receiving MEC.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine whether olanzapine can reduce the frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and improve the quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving palonosetron and dexamethasone as prophylaxis for MEC-induced nausea and vomiting. The primary end point was complete response for the acute phase (0-24 hours after chemotherapy). The secondary end points were complete response for the delayed (24-120 hours) and overall phase (0-120 hours), proportion of significant nausea (visual analogue scale ≥ 25 mm), use ofrescue medications, and effect on QOL.
Results
Fifty-six patients were randomized to the olanzapine (n=29) and placebo (n=27) groups. Complete response rates were not significantly different between the olanzapine and placebo groups in the acute (96.5% vs. 88.0%, p=0.326), delayed (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118), and overall phases (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118). However, the percentage of patients with significant nausea (17.2% vs. 44.0%, p=0.032) and the use of rescue medications (0.03±0.19 vs. 1.88±2.88, p=0.002) were lower in the olanzapine group than in the placebo. Furthermore, the olanzapine group demonstrated better QOL (p=0.015).
Conclusion
Olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone significantly improved QOL and vomiting control among previously untreated patients receiving MEC, although the efficacy was limited to the reduction of the frequency of CINV.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
-
9,291
View
-
494
Download
-
24
Web of Science
-
22
Crossref
|
KCA
