Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Kyung Han Nam 2 Articles
Gastrointestinal cancer
Development and Validation of Models to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer Using Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting Machine Methods
Hae Dong Lee, Kyung Han Nam, Cheol Min Shin, Hye Seung Lee, Young Hoon Chang, Hyuk Yoon, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Hyung-Ho Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1240-1249.   Published online March 21, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1330
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
To identify important features of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and develop a prediction model for early gastric cancer (EGC) using a gradient boosting machine (GBM) method.
Materials and Methods
The clinicopathologic data of 2556 patients with EGC who underwent gastrectomy were used as training set and the internal validation set (set 1) at a ratio of 8:2. Additionally, 548 patients with EGC who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the initial treatment were included in the external validation set (set 2). The GBM model was constructed, and its performance was compared with that of the Japanese guidelines.
Results
LNM was identified in 12.6% (321/2556) of the gastrectomy group (training set & set 1) and 4.3% (24/548) of the ESD group (set 2). In the GBM analysis, the top five features that most affected LNM were lymphovascular invasion, depth, differentiation, size, and location. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics of set 1 were 0.566, 0.922, 0.516, and 0.867, while those of set 2 were 0.810, 0.958, 0.803, and 0.944, respectively. When the sensitivity of GBM was adjusted to that of Japanese guidelines (beyond the expanded criteria in set 1 [0.922] and eCuraC-2 in set 2 [0.958]), the specificities of GBM in sets 1 and 2 were 0.516 (95% confidence interval, 0.502-0.523) and 0.803 (0.795-0.805), while those of the Japanese guidelines were 0.502 (0.488-0.509) and 0.788 (0.780-0.790), respectively.
Conclusion
The GBM model showed good performance comparable with the eCura system in predicting LNM risk in EGCs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intratumoural and peritumoural CT-based radiomics for diagnosing lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma in patients with pure ground-glass nodules: a machine learning approach
    Y. Zou, Q. Mao, Z. Zhao, X. Zhou, Y. Pan, Z. Zuo, W. Zhang
    Clinical Radiology.2024; 79(2): e211.     CrossRef
  • eCura and W-eCura: different scores, different populations, same goal
    Rui Morais, Diogo Libanio, João Santos-Antunes
    Gut.2024; 73(11): e29.     CrossRef
  • A machine learning model for predicting the lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer not meeting the endoscopic curability criteria
    Minoru Kato, Yoshito Hayashi, Ryotaro Uema, Takashi Kanesaka, Shinjiro Yamaguchi, Akira Maekawa, Takuya Yamada, Masashi Yamamoto, Shinji Kitamura, Takuya Inoue, Shunsuke Yamamoto, Takashi Kizu, Risato Takeda, Hideharu Ogiyama, Katsumi Yamamoto, Kenji Aoi,
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(5): 1069.     CrossRef
  • The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Cancer Research: A Comprehensive Guide
    Amin Zadeh Shirazi, Morteza Tofighi, Alireza Gharavi, Guillermo A. Gomez
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Analysis of Different Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma and Pulmonary Inflammatory Pseudotumor
    An-Lin Zhang, Yan-Mei Fu, Zhi-Yang He
    Iranian Journal of Radiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening of gastric cancer diagnostic biomarkers in the homologous recombination signaling pathway and assessment of their clinical and radiomic correlations
    Ahao Wu, Tengcheng Hu, Chao Lai, Qingwen Zeng, Lianghua Luo, Xufeng Shu, Pan Huang, Zhonghao Wang, Zongfeng Feng, Yanyan Zhu, Yi Cao, Zhengrong Li
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,905 View
  • 212 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
p27 Loss Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Hee Sung Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Kyung Han Nam, Jiwoon Choi, Woo Ho Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(4):383-392.   Published online July 17, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.102
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a heterogeneous disease group originating from the neuroendocrine cells. Identification of prognostic markers, related to neuroendocrine tissue-selective tumorigenesis, is necessary to find therapeutic targets.
Materials and Methods
A total of 327 patients with GEP-NETs were included in this study; there were 49 gastric, 29 duodenal, 49 pancreatic, 12 hepatobiliary, 33 appendiceal, 5 proximal colon, and 150 distal colon cases. We performed immunostaining with the tissue microarray method for menin, p27, and p18.
Results
We observed negative staining for menin, p27, and p18 in 34%, 21%, and 56% of GEP-NETs, respectively. The loss of p27, but not menin, was positively correlated with the grade of Ki-67. Menin–/p27–, menin–/p27+, menin+/p27–, and menin+/p27+ phenotype groups included 13%, 22%, 8%, and 57% of patients, respectively. A dichotomized comparison showed that menin– or p27– tumors were significantly associated with foregut and midgut localizations, high World Health Organization (WHO) grade, lymph node metastasis, and more advanced stage as compared to menin+/p27+ patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis for the overall survival showed that p27 loss was significantly associated with decreased survival. Multivariate analysis showed that p27 loss is an independent factor for poor overall survival.
Conclusion
Our results revealed that the loss of p27 is associated with poor prognosis and the menin-p27 pathway is important in the tumorigenesis of GEP-NETs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Menin in Cancer
    Ariana D. Majer, Xianxin Hua, Bryson W. Katona
    Genes.2024; 15(9): 1231.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Immunotherapy in Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Brittany C. Fields, Reed I. Ayabe, Y. David Seo, Jessica E. Maxwell, Daniel M. Halperin
    Current Oncology Reports.2024; 26(11): 1530.     CrossRef
  • Status of Surveillance and Nonsurgical Therapy for Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Dirk-Jan van Beek, Anna Vera D. Verschuur, Lodewijk A.A. Brosens, Gerlof D. Valk, Carolina R.C. Pieterman, Menno R. Vriens
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2023; 32(2): 343.     CrossRef
  • The link between menin and pleiotrophin in the tumor biology of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Liping He, Steeve Boulant, Megan Stanifer, Cuncai Guo, Anna Nießen, Mingyi Chen, Klaus Felix, Frank Bergmann, Oliver Strobel, Simon Schimmack
    Cancer Science.2022; 113(5): 1575.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Meng Dai, Christina S Mullins, Lili Lu, Guido Alsfasser, Michael Linnebacher
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2022; 14(5): 383.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Decision Support System (DSS) for Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Treated with Somatostatin Analog (SSA) Therapy
    Jasminka Hasic Telalovic, Serena Pillozzi, Rachele Fabbri, Alice Laffi, Daniele Lavacchi, Virginia Rossi, Lorenzo Dreoni, Francesca Spada, Nicola Fazio, Amedeo Amedei, Ernesto Iadanza, Lorenzo Antonuzzo
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(5): 804.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Carcinoid Tumors and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer of the Lung
    Mateusz Bilski, Paulina Mertowska, Sebastian Mertowski, Marcin Sawicki, Anna Hymos, Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, Ewelina Grywalska
    Cancers.2021; 14(1): 177.     CrossRef
  • The molecular biology of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Challenges and translational opportunities
    Kate Young, Naureen Starling, Anguraj Sadanandam
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2020; 61: 132.     CrossRef
  • Rb and p53 Execute Distinct Roles in the Development of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Yuki Yamauchi, Yuzo Kodama, Masahiro Shiokawa, Nobuyuki Kakiuchi, Saiko Marui, Takeshi Kuwada, Yuko Sogabe, Teruko Tomono, Atsushi Mima, Toshihiro Morita, Tomoaki Matsumori, Tatsuki Ueda, Motoyuki Tsuda, Yoshihiro Nishikawa, Katsutoshi Kuriyama, Yojiro Sa
    Cancer Research.2020; 80(17): 3620.     CrossRef
  • Signaling networks and the feasibility of computational analysis in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Pengchen Chen, Qingshui Wang, Jianwei Xie, Hang Fai Kwok
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2019; 58: 80.     CrossRef
  • Reduced expression of the RNA‐binding protein HuD in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors correlates with low p27Kip1 levels and poor prognosis
    Chongtae Kim, Da Eun Jeong, Sungeun Heo, Eunbyul Ji, Jun Gi Rho, Myeongwoo Jung, Sojin Ahn, Ye‐Jin Kim, Yong‐Sung Kim, Suk Woo Nam, Rohit N Kulkarni, Kyoung Bun Lee, Eun Kyung Lee, Wook Kim
    The Journal of Pathology.2018; 246(2): 231.     CrossRef
  • Current Standards and Recent Advances in Biomarkers of Major Endocrine Tumors
    Yanhong Luo, Hua Zhu, Tao Tan, Jianfeng He
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeted therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: preclinical strategies and future targets
    E T Aristizabal Prada, C J Auernhammer
    Endocrine Connections.2018; 7(1): R1.     CrossRef
  • Deletion ofMen1andsomatostatininduces hypergastrinemia and gastric carcinoids
    Sinju Sundaresan, Anthony J Kang, Michael M Hayes, Eun-Young K Choi, Juanita L Merchant
    Gut.2017; 66(6): 1012.     CrossRef
  • Cell Cycle Protein Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Yan Shi, Zhi Rong Qian, Sui Zhang, Wanwan Li, Yohei Masugi, Tingting Li, Jennifer A. Chan, Juhong Yang, Annacarolina Da Silva, Mancang Gu, Li Liu, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Keisuke Kosumi, Trevor Dutton, Lauren K. Brais, Reiko Nishihara, Charles S. Fuchs, Shuji Og
    Pancreas.2017; 46(10): 1347.     CrossRef
  • DNA-repair defects in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and potential clinical applications
    Iris H. Liu, James M. Ford, Pamela L. Kunz
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2016; 44: 1.     CrossRef
  • Differential Protein Expression in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors and Liver Metastases
    Michelle Kang Kim, Fei Ye, Daguang Wang, Miao Cui, Stephen C. Ward, Richard R.P. Warner, Sasan Roayaie, Michail Shafir, Myron Schwartz, David Zhang, Steven Itzkowitz
    Pancreas.2016; 45(4): 528.     CrossRef
  • Expression profiling of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors identifies subgroups with clinical relevance, prognostic markers and therapeutic targets
    Ellinor Andersson, Yvonne Arvidsson, Christina Swärd, Tobias Hofving, Bo Wängberg, Erik Kristiansson, Ola Nilsson
    Modern Pathology.2016; 29(6): 616.     CrossRef
  • Cyclin-dependent protein kinase inhibitors including palbociclib as anticancer drugs
    Robert Roskoski
    Pharmacological Research.2016; 107: 249.     CrossRef
  • Recent Updates on Neuroendocrine Tumors From the Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Tracts
    Joo Young Kim, Seung-Mo Hong
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2016; 140(5): 437.     CrossRef
  • Somatic Mutations and Genetic Heterogeneity at the CDKN1B Locus in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Joakim Crona, Tobias Gustavsson, Olov Norlén, Katarina Edfeldt, Tobias Åkerström, Gunnar Westin, Per Hellman, Peyman Björklund, Peter Stålberg
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2015; 22(S3): 1428.     CrossRef
  • Blood and tissue neuroendocrine tumor gene cluster analysis correlate, define hallmarks and predict disease status
    Mark Kidd, Ignat Drozdov, Irvin Modlin
    Endocrine-Related Cancer.2015; 22(4): 561.     CrossRef
  • 12,280 View
  • 66 Download
  • 26 Web of Science
  • 22 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP