Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Ki Hyeong Rhee 1 Article
Correlative Effect between in vivo Hollow Fiber Assay and Xenografts Assay in Drug Screening
Keyong Ho Lee, Ki Hyeong Rhee
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(3):196-200.   Published online June 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.3.196
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

This study was carried out to assess the usage of an in vivo hollow fiber assay to screen drugs with highly predictive accuracy.

Materials and Methods

The assay systems used were the hollow fiber and xenografts assays. The hollow fiber assay was carried out with the following steps; preparation of fibers, preparation of cells, loading and implanting fibers, treatment with drugs, removal of fibers and assaying for the cell viability by the MTT assay. For the xenografts assay, cell suspensions were subcutaneously transplanted into the mice. Therapy was started when the tumor volume reached 100~200 mm3. The tumor volumes were calculated using the formula V=[length+(width)2]/2, and used for evaluating the efficacy of the drugs. The drug treatment doses used were adriamycin 2.1 mg/kg, mitomycin-C 0.25 mg/kg, 5-fluorouracil 24.5 mg/kg and paclitaxel 2.5 mg/kg, and administrated intravenously five times daily.

Results

The correlation between the xenografts and hollow fiber assays was evaluated in 20 tumor cell lines and 4 anti-cancer agents. In the 20 tumor cell lines, the overall predictive accuracy of the hollow fiber assay for sensitivity was 83%, with a predictive accuracy for resistance of 92%.

Conclusion

The hollow fiber assay was assessed as effective in drug efficacy evaluation, and found to be compatible with that of the xenografts assay.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hu-Qi-Zheng-Xiao Decoction Inhibits the Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Suppressing the HIF-1α Signaling Pathway to Inhibit EMT, LCSC, and Angiogenic Process
    Xuejing Wang, Ling Yin, Mengyin Chai, Buxin Kou, Xiaoni Liu, Xiaojun Wang
    Integrative Cancer Therapies.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Models used to screen for the treatment of multidrug resistant cancer facilitated by transporter-based efflux
    Clarissa Willers, Hanna Svitina, Michael J. Rossouw, Roan A. Swanepoel, Josias H. Hamman, Chrisna Gouws
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2019; 145(8): 1949.     CrossRef
  • Characterization of drug responses of mini patient‐derived xenografts in mice for predicting cancer patient clinical therapeutic response
    Feifei Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Yuan Long, Hui Liu, Jijun Cheng, Lin Guo, Rongyu Li, Chao Meng, Shan Yu, Qingchuan Zhao, Shun Lu, Lili Wang, Haitao Wang, Danyi Wen
    Cancer Communications.2018; 38(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Anti-tumor Activity of Saussurea laniceps against Pancreas Adenocarcinoma
    Keyong Ho Lee, Byeong-Soo Kim, Ki-Hyeong Rhee
    Natural Product Sciences.2017; 23(4): 281.     CrossRef
  • Preclinical Efficacy Testing for Stomach and Liver Cancers
    Jun Won Park, Nam Suk Baek, Seok Cheol Lee, Su Jin Oh, Seok Hoon Jang, In Hoo Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Hark Kyun Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2014; 46(2): 186.     CrossRef
  • Novel approaches to glioma drug design and drug screening
    Shivaputra A Patil, Amira Hosni-Ahmed, Terreia S Jones, Renukadevi Patil, Lawrence M Pfeffer, Duane D Miller
    Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery.2013; 8(9): 1135.     CrossRef
  • 8,916 View
  • 94 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP