Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Joo-Hyun Nam 2 Articles
Fatal Ifosfamide-Induced Metabolic Encephalopathy in Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Report of Two Cases
You-Jung Shin, Ji-Young Kim, Jei-Won Moon, Rae-Mi You, Jeong-Yeol Park, Joo-Hyun Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2011;43(4):260-263.   Published online December 27, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2011.43.4.260
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Central nervous system (CNS) toxicity has been reported in approximately 10-30% of patients receiving intravenous infusions of ifosfamide. Encephalopathy is a rare but serious CNS adverse reaction in these patients, and although usually transient and reversible, may cause persistent neurological dysfunction or death. Clinical features range from fatigue and confusion to coma and death. Although methylene blue can be used to treat ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity, including encephalopathy, its mechanism of action remains poorly defined. We describe here two patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who experienced fatal encephalopathy following ifosfamide/mesna treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rare Delayed Ifosfamide Encephalopathy: A Case Report of Chemotherapeutic Neurotoxicity
    Ambika Menon, Chidiebele A. Enunwa, William L. Read, Kyle P. James
    Case Reports in Oncology.2024; 17(1): 202.     CrossRef
  • Potential of Cytochrome P450, a Family of Xenobiotic Metabolizing Enzymes, in Cancer Therapy
    Ragini D. Singh, Avadhesh Avadhesh, Gaurav Sharma, Sagar Dholariya, Rima B. Shah, Bela Goyal, Subash Chandra Gupta
    Antioxidants & Redox Signaling.2023; 38(10-12): 853.     CrossRef
  • Ifosfamide - History, efficacy, toxicity and encephalopathy
    Jeffrey R. Idle, Diren Beyoğlu
    Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2023; 243: 108366.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Encephalopathy Caused by Drug Interaction between Ifosfamide and Aprepitant
    Tomomi Sano, Nokitaka Setsu, Eisuke Kobayashi, Akira Kawai
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI.2023; 143(6): 541.     CrossRef
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma: Current Therapy, Challenges, and Future Approaches to Treatment Strategies
    Ali Zarrabi, David Perrin, Mahboubeh Kavoosi, Micah Sommer, Serap Sezen, Parvaneh Mehrbod, Bhavya Bhushan, Filip Machaj, Jakub Rosik, Philip Kawalec, Saba Afifi, Seyed Mohammadreza Bolandi, Peiman Koleini, Mohsen Taheri, Tayyebeh Madrakian, Marek J. Łos,
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5269.     CrossRef
  • Ifosfamide-induced Encephalopathy With Rapid Response to Thiamine: A Pediatric Case
    Eren Müngen, İnci Yaman Bajin, Sibel Öz, Ceren Günbey, Banu Anlar, Burca Aydin
    Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.2022; 44(7): 402.     CrossRef
  • Methylene blue and ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy: Myth or reality?
    Halima Abahssain, Badreddine Moukafih, Hajar Essangri, Hind Mrabti, Bouchra Meddah, Fadila Guessous, Fatima Zahra Fadhil, Amine Souadka, Hassan Errihani
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2021; 27(1): 143.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Berberis vulgaris L. root extract on ifosfamide-induced in vivo toxicity and in vitro cytotoxicity
    Shazia Ilyas, Raheela Tabasum, Ali Iftikhar, Mamoona Nazir, Amina Hussain, Aroosha Hussain, Muhammad Sajjad Ali, Farooq Saleem, Uzma Saleem, Matheus Froeyen, Iskandar Abdullah, Muhammad Usman Mirza, Sarfraz Ahmad
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ifosfamide-related encephalopathy with severe clinical presentations in children with cancer
    Eda Ataseven, Şebnem Önen Göktepe, Mehmet Kantar
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2021; 27(8): 2018.     CrossRef
  • Neurotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs: Mechanisms, susceptibility, and neuroprotective strategies
    Claudia Pellacani, Georgios Eleftheriou
    Advances in Medical Sciences.2020; 65(2): 265.     CrossRef
  • Delayed Ifosfamide Neurotoxicity
    Jill Yeager, Alina Basnet
    American Journal of Therapeutics.2020; 27(6): e613.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and EEG Characteristics of Ifosfamide-Related Encephalopathy
    Aaron M. Gusdon, Rachna Malani, Xi Chen
    Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.2019; 36(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • Incidence et facteurs de risque de l’encéphalopathie à l’ifosfamide chez les patients suivis pour un sarcome
    Natacha Stern, Ilyes Sakji, Anne-Sophie Defachelles, Cyril Lervat, Thomas Ryckewaert, Guillaume Marliot, Charlotte Peugniez, Dominique Deplanque, Nicolas Penel
    Bulletin du Cancer.2017; 104(3): 208.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of ifosfamide-related encephalopathy in adult patients with cancer: A retrospective analysis
    Yin Lo, Li-Jiuan Shen, Wen-Hwei Chen, Yaa-Hui Dong, Fe-Lin Lin Wu
    Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.2016; 115(9): 744.     CrossRef
  • The Neurotoxicity and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Ifosfamide
    Martin S. Highley, Guido Momerency, Diane Sawyers, Ernst A. De Bruijn, Hans Prenen, Gunther Guetens, Gert De Boeck, Allan T. Van Oosterom, Janine L. Mansi, Peter R. Blake, Tim Mant, Robert A.A. Maes , Peter G. Harper
    Journal of Analytical Oncology.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ifosfamide related encephalopathy: The need for a timely EEG evaluation
    Anteneh M. Feyissa, Sudhakar Tummala
    Journal of the Neurological Sciences.2014; 336(1-2): 109.     CrossRef
  • PharmGKB summary
    Daniella Lowenberg, Caroline F. Thorn, Zeruesenay Desta, David A. Flockhart, Russ B. Altman, Teri E. Klein
    Pharmacogenetics and Genomics.2014; 24(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Two Cases of Fatal Encephalopathy Related to Ifosfamide: An Adverse Role of Aprepitant
    Alice Séjourné, Sabine Noal, Mathieu Boone, Céline Bihan, Marion Sassier, Michel Andrejak, Bruno Chauffert
    Case Reports in Oncology.2014; 7(3): 669.     CrossRef
  • 13,887 View
  • 111 Download
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
A Preliminary Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Monthly 5-flourouracil and Cisplatin to Weekly Cisplatin Alone Combined with Concurrent Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
Young Seok Kim, Seong Soo Shin, Eun Kyung Choi, Jong Hoon Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Sang-wook Lee, Heon-Jin Park, Young-Tak Kim, Jung-Eun Mok, Joo-Hyun Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(1):37-43.   Published online February 28, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.1.37
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

To determine the superior chemotherapeutic regimen between monthly 5-FU plus cisplatin (FP) and weekly cisplatin alone in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer, the compliance of treatment, response, survival and toxicities were analyzed between the two arms.

Materials and Methods

Between March 1998 and December 2001, 61 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IIB through IVA) and negative para-aortic lymph nodes were randomly assigned to either 'monthly FP' (arm I, n=34) or 'weekly cisplatin' (arm II, n=27) with concurrent radiotherapy. The patients of arm I received FP (5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day + cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day, for 5 days, for 3 cycles at 4 week intervals) and those of arm II received cisplatin (30 mg/m2/day, for 6 cycles at 1 week intervals) with concurrent radiotherapy. The radiotherapy consisted of 41.4~50.4 Gy external beam irradiation in 23~28 fractions to the whole pelvis, with high dose rate brachytherapy delivering a dose of 30~35 Gy in 6~7 fractions to point A. During the brachytherapy, a parametrial boost was delivered. The median follow-up period for survivors was 44 months.

Results

The compliance of treatment in monthly FP weekly cisplatin arms were 62 and 81%, respectively. The complete response rates at 3 months were 96 and 88% in arms I and II, respectively. The 4-year overall survival and disease free survival rates were 64 and 54% in the arm I and 77 and 66% in the arm II, respectively. The incidence of hematologic toxicity more than grade 2 was 29% in the arm I and 15% in the arm II. Only one patient in arm I experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. No severe genitourinary toxicity was observed.

Conclusion

No significant difference was observed in the compliance, responses, survival rates and acute toxicities between the two treatment arms. More patients and further follow up will be required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: A pooled analysis of clinical outcomes for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Jyoti Mayadev, Akila Viswanathan, Yu Liu, Chin-Shang Li, Kevin Albuquerque, Antonio L. Damato, Sushil Beriwal, Beth Erickson
    Brachytherapy.2017; 16(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Concurrent Weekly Cisplatin Versus Triweekly Cisplatin with Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis Result
    Yan Hu, Zhi-Qiang Cai, Xiao-Yan Su
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2012; 13(9): 4301.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopy-Assisted Intracavitary Radiotherapy Tandem Placement for Patients With Cervical Cancer
    Myong Cheol Lim, Dae Chul Jung, Joo-Young Kim, Sang-Yoon Park
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2009; 19(6): 1125.     CrossRef
  • Adoptive Transfer of Human Papillomavirus E7-specific CTL Enhances Tumor Chemoresponse Through the Perforin/Granzyme-mediated Pathway
    Jeong-Im Sin, Jung-Min Kim, Sung Hwa Bae, In Hee Lee, Jong Sup Park, Hun Mo Ryoo
    Molecular Therapy.2009; 17(5): 906.     CrossRef
  • 9,699 View
  • 56 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP