Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Baek-Yeol Ryoo 21 Articles
Gastrointestinal cancer
Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Se Jin Choi, Sung Won Chung, Jonggi Choi, Kang Mo Kim, Hyung-Don Kim, Changhoon Yoo, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Seung Soo Lee, Won-Mook Choi, Sang Hyun Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(4):1219-1230.   Published online May 7, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.283
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to identify clinical and radiologic characteristics that could predict response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Materials and Methods
This single-center retrospective study included 108 advanced HCC patients with intrahepatic lesions who were treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Two radiologists independently analyzed imaging characteristics of the index tumor on pretreatment computed tomography. Predictive factors associated with progressive disease (PD) at the best response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, ver. 1.1 were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.
Results
Of 108 patients with a median PFS of 15 weeks, 40 (37.0%) had PD during treatment. Factors associated with PD included the presence of extrahepatic metastases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 14.35; p=0.03), the infiltrative appearance of the tumor (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.05 to 8.93; p=0.04), and the absence of arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (aOR, 6.34; 95% CI, 2.18 to 18.47; p < 0.001). Patients with two or more of these factors had a PD of 66.7% and a median PFS of 8 weeks, indicating a significantly worse outcome compared to the patients with one or no of these factors.
Conclusion
In patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment, the absence of APHE, infiltrative appearance of the intrahepatic tumor, and presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with poor response and survival. Evaluation of early response may be necessary in patients with these factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Liver Transplantation for Hepatocarcinoma: Results over Two Decades of a Transplantation Programme and Analysis of Factors Associated with Recurrence
    María Martínez Burgos, Rocío González Grande, Susana López Ortega, Inmaculada Santaella Leiva, Jesús de la Cruz Lombardo, Julio Santoyo Santoyo, Miguel Jiménez Pérez
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(6): 1302.     CrossRef
  • 1,405 View
  • 94 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Outcomes of Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Yoo Na Lee, Min Kyu Sung, Dae Wook Hwang, Yejong Park, Bong Jun Kwak, Woohyung Lee, Ki Byung Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Changhoon Yoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Heung-Moon Chang, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Song Cheol Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(4):1240-1251.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.977
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Clinical outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been investigated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), despite well-established outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with LAPC who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 2017 and December 2020.
Results
Among 1,358 patients, 260 underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among 356 LAPC patients, 98 (27.5%) and 147 (35.1%) of 418 BRPC patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Compared to resectable pancreatic cancer (resectable PC) with upfront surgery, both LAPC and BRPC exhibited higher rates of venous resection (28.6% vs. 49.0% vs. 4.0%), arterial resection (30.6% vs. 6.8% vs. 0.5%) and greater estimated blood loss (260.5 vs. 213.1 vs. 70.4 mL). However, hospital stay, readmission rates, and postoperative pancreatic fistula rates (grade B or C) did not differ significantly between LAPC, BRPC, and resectable PC. Overall and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between LAPC and BRPC patients. The median overall survival was 37.3 months for LAPC and 37.0 months for BRPC. The median relapse-free survival was 22.7 months for LAPC and 26.0 months for BRPC.
Conclusion
Overall survival time and postoperative complications in LAPC patients who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed similar results to those of BRPC patients. Further research is needed to identify specific sub-populations of LAPC patients who benefit most from conversion surgery and to minimize postoperative complications.
  • 1,020 View
  • 79 Download
Close layer
General
Phase 1/2a Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Yoon-Koo Kang, Min-Hee Ryu, Yong Sang Hong, Chang-Min Choi, Tae Won Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Jeong Eun Kim, John R. Weis, Rachel Kingsford, Cheol Hee Park, Seong Jang, Arlo McGinn, Theresa L. Werner, Sunil Sharma
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(3):743-750.   Published online January 18, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.980
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to report the results from an early-phase study of rivoceranib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor highly selective for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Materials and Methods
In this open-label, single-arm, dose-escalating, multicenter three-part phase 1/2a trial, patients had advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy. Part 1 evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of five ascending once-daily doses of rivoceranib from 81 mg to 685 mg. Part 2 evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of once-daily rivoceranib 685 mg. Part 3 was conducted later, due to lack of maximum tolerated dose determination in part 1, to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of once-daily rivoceranib 805 mg in patients with unresectable or advanced gastric cancer.
Results
A total of 61 patients were enrolled in parts 1 (n=25), 2 (n=30), and 3 (n=6). In parts 1 and 2, patients were white (45.5%) or Asian (54.5%), and 65.6% were male. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hypertension (32.7%), hyponatremia (10.9%), and hypophosphatemia (10.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.2%. In part 3, dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two out of six patients: grade 3 febrile neutropenia decreased appetite, and fatigue. The ORR was 33%.
Conclusion
The recommended phase 2 dose of rivoceranib was determined to be 685 mg once daily, which showed adequate efficacy with a manageable safety profile (NCT01497704 and NCT02711969).
  • 3,288 View
  • 132 Download
Close layer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Analysis of Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX: Clinical Relevance of DNA Damage Repair Gene Alteration Detection
Dong-Hoon Lim, Hyunseok Yoon, Kyu-pyo Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Tae Jun Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Ki Byung Song, Song Cheol Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Jaewon Hyung, Changhoon Yoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1313-1320.   Published online May 4, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.452
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
There are no reliable biomarkers to guide treatment for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) in the neoadjuvant setting. We used plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing to search biomarkers for patients with BRPC receiving neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in our phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02749136).
Materials and Methods
Among the 44 patients enrolled in the trial, patients with plasma ctDNA sequencing at baseline or post-operation were included in this analysis. Plasma cell-free DNA isolation and sequencing were performed using the Guardant 360 assay. Detection of genomic alterations, including DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, were examined for correlations with survival.
Results
Among the 44 patients, 28 patients had ctDNA sequencing data qualified for the analysis and were included in this study. Among the 25 patients with baseline plasma ctDNA data, 10 patients (40%) had alterations of DDR genes detected at baseline, inclu-ding ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2 and MLH1, and showed significantly better progression-free survival than those without such DDR gene alterations detected (median, 26.6 vs. 13.5 months; log-rank p=0.004). Patients with somatic KRAS mutations detected at baseline (n=6) had significantly worse overall survival (median, 8.5 months vs. not applicable; log-rank p=0.003) than those without. Among 13 patients with post-operative plasma ctDNA data, eight patients (61.5%) had detectable somatic alterations.
Conclusion
Detection of DDR gene mutations from plasma ctDNA at baseline was associated with better survival outcomes of pati-ents with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX and may be a prognostic biomarker.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Practical Approach to Interpreting Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers
    Zexi Allan, David S Liu, Margaret M Lee, Jeanne Tie, Nicholas J Clemons
    Clinical Chemistry.2024; 70(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • High somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA predict response of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to first-line nab-paclitaxel plus S-1: prospective study
    Lei Huang, Yao Lv, Shasha Guan, Huan Yan, Lu Han, Zhikuan Wang, Quanli Han, Guanghai Dai, Yan Shi
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Decoding the Dynamics of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsies
    Khadija Turabi, Kelsey Klute, Prakash Radhakrishnan
    Cancers.2024; 16(13): 2432.     CrossRef
  • Building on the clinical applicability of ctDNA analysis in non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Ibone Labiano, Ana E. Huerta, Maria Alsina, Hugo Arasanz, Natalia Castro, Saioa Mendaza, Arturo Lecumberri, Iranzu Gonzalez-Borja, David Guerrero-Setas, Ana Patiño-Garcia, Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu, Irene Hernández-Garcia, Virginia Arrazubi, Elena Mata, Davi
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Liquid biopsy analysis of lipometabolic exosomes in pancreatic cancer
    Wei Guo, Peiyao Ying, Ruiyang Ma, Zuoqian Jing, Gang Ma, Jin Long, Guichen Li, Zhe Liu
    Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews.2023; 73: 69.     CrossRef
  • 3,677 View
  • 257 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Underwent Surgery Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX
So Heun Lee, Dae Wook Hwang, Changhoon Yoo, Kyu-pyo Kim, Sora Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Dongwook Oh, Tae Jun Song, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Dong Wan Seo, Jin-hong Park, Ki Byung Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Woohyung Lee, Yejong Park, Bong Jun Kwak, Heung-Moon Chang, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Song Cheol Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(3):956-968.   Published online February 27, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.409
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following curative-intent surgery in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who had received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX is unclear. This study aimed to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in this patient population.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study included 218 patients with localized non-metastatic PDAC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and underwent curative-intent surgery (R0 or R1) between January 2017 and December 2020. The association of adjuvant chemotherapy with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in overall patients and in the propensity score matched (PSM) cohort. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the pathology-proven lymph node status.
Results
Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 149 patients (68.3%). In the overall cohort, the adjuvant chemotherapy group had significantly improved DFS and OS compared to the observation group (DFS: median, 13.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0 to 19.1] vs. 8.2 months [95% CI, 6.5 to 12.0]; p < 0.001; and OS: median, 38.0 months [95% CI, 32.2 to not assessable] vs. 25.7 months [95% CI, 18.3 to not assessable]; p=0.005). In the PSM cohort of 57 matched pairs of patients, DFS and OS were better in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the observation group (p < 0.001 and p=0.038, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was a significant favorable prognostic factor (vs. observation; DFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.71; p < 0.001]; OS: HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.71; p < 0.001]).
Conclusion
Among PDAC patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with improved survival. Randomized studies should be conducted to validate this finding.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The survival effect of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant plus adjuvant therapy on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with different TNM stages: a propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database
    Hao Hu, Yang Xu, Qiang Zhang, Yuan Gao, Zhenyu Wu
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2024; 24(6): 467.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Whom, when and how
    Nebojsa Manojlovic, Goran Savic, Stevan Manojlovic
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1223.     CrossRef
  • Case Study on Analysing the Early Disease Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Korean Association for Clinical Oncology
    Sijithra Ponnarassery Chandran, N. Santhi
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 47(10): 475.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing radical pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant therapy—a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiahao Wu, Yike Zhang, Haodong Wang, Wenyi Guo, Chengqing Li, Yichen Yu, Han Liu, Feng Li, Lei Wang, Jianwei Xu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,515 View
  • 155 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis of 646 Patients
Jwa Hoon Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-pyo Kim, Heung-Moon Chang, Dongwook Oh, Tae Jun Song, Sang Soo Lee, Dong Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim, Yejong Park, Jae Woo Kwon, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Woohyung Lee, Song Cheol Kim, Changhoon Yoo, Ki Byung Song
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(2):424-435.   Published online November 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.953
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with resected ampulla of Vater (AoV) carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
Data from 646 patients who underwent surgical resection at Asan Medical Center between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
The median age of the patients was 62 years, and 54.2% were male. Patients were classified into AC group (n=165, 25.5%) and no AC group (n=481, 74.5%). With a median follow-up duration of 88 months, in patients with stage I, II, III, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was not reached, 44 months, and 15 months, respectively, and the median overall survival (OS) were not reached, 88 months and 35 months, respectively. Despite no statistical significance, RFS and OS were better in stage II patients with AC than in those without AC (median RFS, 151 months vs. 38 months; p=0.156 and median OS, 153 months vs. 74 months; p=0.299). In multivariate analysis for RFS and OS, TNM stage, R1 resection status, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion remained significant factors, whereas AC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 1.00; p=0.052) was marginally related with RFS. After propensity score matching in only stage II/III patients, RFS and OS with AC were numerically longer than those without AC (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.06; p=0.116 and HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.06; p=0.111).
Conclusion
AC with fluoropyrimidine did not improve survival of patients with resected AoV carcinoma. However, multivariate analysis with prognostic factors showed a marginally significant survival benefit with AC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced ampulla of Vater cancer
    Chae Hwa Kwon, Hyung Il Seo, Dong Uk Kim, Sung Yong Han, Suk Kim, Nam Kyung Lee, Seung Baek Hong, Ji Hyun Ahn, Young Mok Park, Byeong Gwan Noh
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2024; 12(2): 267.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic efficacy of lymph node parameters in resected ampullary adenocarcinoma based on long-term follow-up data after adjuvant treatment
    Namyoung Park, In Rae Cho, Sang Hyub Lee, Joo Seong Kim, Jin Ho Choi, Min Woo Lee, Woo Hyun Paik, Kwang Ro Joo, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Effect on Long-Term Survival in Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study
    Dong Woo Shin, Jae Min Lee, Jong-chan Lee, Hee Seung Lee, Seung Bae Yoon, Dong Kee Jang, Joo Kyung Park, Min Kyu Jung, Yoon Suk Lee, Jin-Hyeok Hwang
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 237(3): 501.     CrossRef
  • Role of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence and survival in patients with resected ampulla of Vater carcinoma
    Se Jun Park, Kabsoo Shin, In-Ho Kim, Tae Ho Hong, Younghoon Kim, Myung-ah Lee
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2023; 15(4): 677.     CrossRef
  • Remission from the 5-Fu-Based Chemotherapy to Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy-Based on the Pathological Classification of Periampullary Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Wei Hu, Zhiqing Duan, Yinuo Zhang, Jing Liu, Jing Bao, Ruqing Gao, Yajie Tang, Tiande Liu, Hu Xiong, Wen Li, Xiaowei Fu, Shousheng Liao, Lu Fang, Bo Liang
    OncoTargets and Therapy.2022; Volume 15: 891.     CrossRef
  • 7,253 View
  • 370 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Systemic Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea: Literature Review and Expert Opinion
Changhoon Yoo, Chung Ryul Oh, Seung-Tae Kim, Woo Kyun Bae, Hye-Jin Choi, Do-Youn Oh, Myung-Ah Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(2):291-300.   Published online December 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1233
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of malignancies arising from neuroendocrine cells and frequently originate in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Although curative resection is the main treatment for localized disease, systemic therapy is needed for relapsed or metastatic/unresectable gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs). Although there are several NET treatment guidelines from various countries, the geographical discrepancies between patient clinical characteristics, the regulatory approval status for therapeutic agents, and medical practices necessitate specific guidelines for Korean patients. We here provide a consensus review of the diagnosis, staging and systemic treatment of Korean GEP-NET patients. Systemic therapy options and the current Korean expert consensus on these treatments, including somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies such as everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide treatments, and cytotoxic chemotherapies are addressed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and Safety of Lu-177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea
    Yeokyeong Shin, Bo Hyun Moon, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Heung-Moon Chang, Kyu-pyo Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Jin-Sook Ryu, Yong-il Kim, Changhoon Yoo
    Targeted Oncology.2024; 19(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Retreatment with177Lu-DOTATATE in Patients with Progressive Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Real-World Study in the United States
    Ebrahim S. Delpassand, Soheil M. Yazdi, Shashank Ghantoji, Antonio Nakasato, Corinne Strickland, Rodolfo Nunez, Afshin Shafie, Susan Cork, Clare Byrne, Jackson Tang, Jeetvan Patel
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine.2024; 65(5): 746.     CrossRef
  • Advances in hydrogel materials applied to pancreatic-related diseases
    Yuan Zhou, Maoen Pan, Ronggui Lin, Heguang Huang
    Journal of Pancreatology.2024; 7(3): 222.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of interim [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumour who underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
    Eonwoo Shin, Yong-il Kim, Changhoon Yoo, Yeokyeong Shin, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Dong Yun Lee, Jin-Sook Ryu
    European Radiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Consideration of quality of life in the treatment decision-making for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Boris G. Naraev, Josh Mailman, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Heloisa P. Soares, Erik S. Mittra, Julie Hallet
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(6): 601.     CrossRef
  • KSNM60 in Nuclear Endocrinology: from the Beginning to the Future
    Chae Moon Hong, Young Jin Jeong, Hae Won Kim, Byeong-Cheol Ahn
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2022; 56(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors against Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eun-Joo Park, Hyo-Jung Park, Kyung-Won Kim, Chong-Hyun Suh, Changhoon Yoo, Young-Kwang Chae, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Nikhil H. Ramaiya
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 794.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs)
    Krzysztof Kaliszewski, Maksymilian Ludwig, Maria Greniuk, Agnieszka Mikuła, Karol Zagórski, Jerzy Rudnicki
    Cancers.2022; 14(8): 2028.     CrossRef
  • Capecitabine plus temozolomide in patients with grade 3 unresectable or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with Ki-67 index <55%: single-arm phase II study
    H. Jeong, J. Shin, J.H. Jeong, K.-p. Kim, S.-M. Hong, Y.-i. Kim, J.-S. Ryu, B.-Y. Ryoo, C. Yoo
    ESMO Open.2021; 6(3): 100119.     CrossRef
  • 10,056 View
  • 366 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Spatial Distribution and Prognostic Implications of Tumor-Infiltrating FoxP3- CD4+ T Cells in Biliary Tract Cancer
Hyung-Don Kim, Jwa Hoon Kim, Yeon-Mi Ryu, Danbee Kim, Sunmin Lee, Jaehoon Shin, Seung-Mo Hong, Ki-Hun Kim, Dong‐Hwan Jung, Gi‐Won Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Ki Byung Song, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Jae Ho Jeong, Kyu-pyo Kim, Sang-Yeob Kim, Changhoon Yoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(1):162-171.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.704
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The clinical implications of tumor-infiltrating T cell subsets and their spatial distribution in biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin were investigated.
Materials and Methods
A total of 52 BTC patients treated with palliative gemcitabine plus cisplatin were included. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry was performed on tumor tissues, and immune infiltrates were separately analyzed for the stroma, tumor margin, and tumor core.
Results
The density of CD8+ T cells, FoxP3- CD4+ helper T cells, and FoxP3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells was significantly higher in the tumor margin than in the stroma and tumor core. The density of LAG3- or TIM3-expressing CD8+ T cell and FoxP3- CD4+ helper T cell infiltrates was also higher in the tumor margin. In extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, there was a higher density of T cell subsets in the tumor core and regulatory T cells in all regions. A high density of FoxP3- CD4+ helper T cells in the tumor margin showed a trend toward better progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.092) and significantly better overall survival (OS) (p=0.012). In multivariate analyses, a high density of FoxP3- CD4+ helper T cells in the tumor margin was independently associated with favorable PFS and OS.
Conclusion
The tumor margin is the major site for the active infiltration of T cell subsets with higher levels of LAG3 and TIM3 expression in BTC. The density of tumor margin-infiltrating FoxP3- CD4+ helper T cells may be associated with clinical outcomes in BTC patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Deciphering the tumor immune microenvironment from a multidimensional omics perspective: insight into next-generation CAR-T cell immunotherapy and beyond
    Zhaokai Zhou, Jiahui Wang, Jiaojiao Wang, Shuai Yang, Ruizhi Wang, Ge Zhang, Zhengrui Li, Run Shi, Zhan Wang, Qiong Lu
    Molecular Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes: A promising immunotherapeutic target for preventing immune escape in cholangiocarcinoma
    Sijia Hua, Xinyi Gu, Hangbin Jin, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qiang Liu, Jianfeng Yang
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2024; 177: 117080.     CrossRef
  • Focusing on the Immune Cells: Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer
    Luohang Ni, Jianing Xu, Quanpeng Li, Xianxiu Ge, Fei Wang, Xueting Deng, Lin Miao
    Cancer Management and Research.2024; Volume 16: 941.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Powered Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Potential Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer
    Yeong Hak Bang, Choong-kun Lee, Kyunghye Bang, Hyung-Don Kim, Kyu-pyo Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Inkeun Park, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Dong Ki Lee, Hye Jin Choi, Taek Chung, Seung Hyuck Jeon, Eui-Cheol Shin, Chiyoon Oum, Seulki Kim, Yoojoo Lim, Gahee Park, Chang Ho Ahn, T
    Clinical Cancer Research.2024; 30(20): 4635.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma
    S.-Y. Jun, S. An, S.-M. Hong, J.-Y. Kim, K.-P. Kim
    ESMO Open.2024; 9(11): 103969.     CrossRef
  • Tumor immune microenvironment and the current immunotherapy of cholangiocarcinoma (Review)
    Siqi Yang, Ruiqi Zou, Yushi Dai, Yafei Hu, Fuyu Li, Haijie Hu
    International Journal of Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic significance of tumor microenvironment in cholangiocarcinoma: focus on tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes
    Chaoqun Li, Lei Bie, Muhua Chen, Jieer Ying
    Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy.2023; 4(6): 1310.     CrossRef
  • Dynamic increase of M2 macrophages is associated with disease progression of colorectal cancers following cetuximab-based treatment
    Hyung-Don Kim, Sun Young Kim, Jihun Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Buhm Han, Eunyoung Tak, Yeon-Mi Ryu, Sang-Yeob Kim, Tae Won Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Up-to-Date Pathologic Classification and Molecular Characteristics of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Taek Chung, Young Nyun Park
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cholangiocarcinoma
    Dong Liu, Lara Rosaline Heij, Zoltan Czigany, Edgar Dahl, Sven Arke Lang, Tom Florian Ulmer, Tom Luedde, Ulf Peter Neumann, Jan Bednarsch
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implications of the tumor microenvironment using multiplexed immunohistochemistry in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab
    Jwa Hoon Kim, Gi Hwan Kim, Yeon-Mi Ryu, Sang-Yeob Kim, Hyung-Don Kim, Shin Kyo Yoon, Yong Mee Cho, Jae Lyun Lee
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spatial architecture of the immune microenvironment orchestrates tumor immunity and therapeutic response
    Tong Fu, Lei-Jie Dai, Song-Yang Wu, Yi Xiao, Ding Ma, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,828 View
  • 231 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Patients with Refractory Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Tumor Proportion Score as a Potential Biomarker for Response
Junho Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Hee-Sang Hwang, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Dong Wook Oh, Tae Jun Song, Ki-Hun Kim, Shin Hwang, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim, Jin-hong Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Kyu-pyo Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Changhoon Yoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):594-603.   Published online December 18, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.493
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The current standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has limited benefit, and novel therapies need to be investigated.
Materials and Methods
In this prospective cohort study, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive BTC patients who progressed on first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin were enrolled. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks.
Results
Between May 2018 and February 2019, 40 patients were enrolled. Pembrolizumab was given as second-line (47.5%) or ≥ third-line therapy (52.5%). The objective response rate was 10% and 12.5% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 and immune- modified RECIST (imRECIST) and median duration of response was 6.3 months. Among patients with progressive disease as best response, one patient (1/20, 5.0%) achieved complete response subsequently. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0 to 3.0) and 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 5.1), respectively, and objective response per imRECIST was significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p=0.001). Tumor proportion score ≥ 50% was significantly associated with higher response rates including the response after pseudoprogression (vs. < 50%; 37.5% vs. 6.5%; p=0.049).
Conclusion
Pembrolizumab showed modest anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated PD-L1–positive BTC patients. In patients who showed objective response, durable response could be achieved.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ex vivo liver resection and auto-transplantation and special systemic therapy in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treatment
    Konstantin Y Tchilikidi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(3): 635.     CrossRef
  • The predictive value of PD-L1 expression in response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seung Bae Yoon, Sang Myung Woo, Jung Won Chun, Dong Uk Kim, Jaihwan Kim, Joo Kyung Park, Hoonsub So, Moon Jae Chung, In Rae Cho, Jun Heo
    Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the promise of PD1/PD-L1: A new dawn in immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma
    Fei Chen, Jian Sheng, Xiaoping Li, Zhaofeng Gao, Siqi Zhao, Lingyu Hu, Minjie Chen, Jianguo Fei, Zhengwei Song
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2024; 175: 116659.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with other targeted or immunological therapy regimens for the treatment of advanced bile tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jianpeng Zhou, Jia Li, Zhongqi Fan, Guoyue Lv, Guangyi Wang
    Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Camrelizumab combined with gemcitabine and apatinib in treating advanced PD‐L1‐positive biliary tract cancers
    Yitong Tian, Changxian Li, Ke Jin, Ling Ma, Jiaguang Zhang, Xinyi Zhang, Wei You, Haoyang Shen, Yuting Ding, Hao Qian, Xiangcheng Li, Xiaofeng Chen
    Cancer Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy plus lenvatinib to treat advanced gallbladder cancer in the elderly: a case series and review of current literature
    Lantian Wang, Kezhong Tang, Xiawei Li, Wenjie Lu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(3): 941.     CrossRef
  • A prospective multicenter phase II study of FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced and recurrent biliary tract cancer
    Naminatsu Takahara, Yousuke Nakai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Yuji Morine, Kazuo Watanabe, Makoto Ueno, Tatsuya Ioka, Masashi Kanai, Shunsuke Kondo, Naohiro Okano, Kazuhiko Koike
    Investigational New Drugs.2023; 41(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • Revisiting targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma
    Jiajia Du, Xing Lv, Zunyi Zhang, Zhiyong Huang, Erlei Zhang
    Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable or metastatic combined hepatocellular–cholangiocarcinoma
    Yoon Jung Jang, Eo Jin Kim, Hyung-Don Kim, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Min-Hee Ryu, Sook Ryun Park, Won-Mook Choi, Danbi Lee, Jonggi Choi, Ju Hyun Shim, Kang Mo Kim, Young-Suk Lim, Han Chu Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Changhoon Yoo
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(10): 7547.     CrossRef
  • Precision Medicine and Immunotherapy Have Arrived for Cholangiocarcinoma: An Overview of Recent Approvals and Ongoing Clinical Trials
    Thomas B. Karasic, Jennifer R. Eads, Lipika Goyal
    JCO Precision Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Moving Beyond Single-Agent Checkpoint Inhibition in Biliary Tract Cancers: What is the Next Frontier?
    Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Tanios Bekaii-Saab
    Immunotherapy.2023; 15(7): 531.     CrossRef
  • Chemo-Free Treatment Using Anti-PD-1 Antibodies with Lenvatinib in Unresectable Gallbladder Cancer: PD-L1 May Be a Potential Biomarker for a Better Outcome
    Tiantian Wu, Changsheng Pu, Xianjia Wu, Qiang Wang, Keming Zhang
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(11): 1833.     CrossRef
  • Lacking Immunotherapy Biomarkers for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
    Giorgio Frega, Fernando P. Cossio, Jesus M. Banales, Vincenzo Cardinale, Rocio I. R. Macias, Chiara Braconi, Angela Lamarca
    Cells.2023; 12(16): 2098.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 Antibody Plus Lenvatinib and Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Patients with Stage IV Gallbladder Cancer: A Real-World Study in a Chinese Population
    Tiantian Wu, Changsheng Pu, Qiang Wang, Keming Zhang
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(11): 2933.     CrossRef
  • The Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 on Immune Cells Is Related to a Better Prognosis in Biliary Tract Cancer
    Sung Chan Kwon, Seungmin Bang, Young Nyun Park, Ji Hoon Park, So Jeong Kim, Jung Hyun Jo, Moon Jae Chung, Jeong Youp Park, Seung Woo Park, Si Young Song, Eunhyang Park, Hee Seung Lee
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(6): 933.     CrossRef
  • Equipoise, drug development, and biliary cancer
    Tristan Y. Lee, Susan E. Bates, Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa
    Cancer.2022; 128(5): 944.     CrossRef
  • Novel and emerging targets for cholangiocarcinoma progression: therapeutic implications
    Lionel A. Kankeu Fonkoua, Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Kabir Mody, Amit Mahipal, Mitesh J. Borad, Lewis R. Roberts
    Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets.2022; 26(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Penpulimab, an anti-PD1 IgG1 antibody in the treatment of advanced or metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancers
    Yulong Zheng, Anna Rachelle Austria Mislang, Jermaine Coward, Rasha Cosman, Adam Cooper, Craig Underhill, Jianqing Zhu, Jianping Xiong, Ou Jiang, Hong Wang, Yanru Xie, Yuefen Zhou, Xiaoping Jin, Baiyong Li, Zhongmin Maxwell Wang, Kon Yew Kwek, Dennis Xia,
    Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.2022; 71(10): 2371.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD1/PDL1 in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qi Jiang, Jinsheng Huang, Bei Zhang, Xujia Li, Xiuxing Chen, Bokang Cui, Shengping Li, Guifang Guo
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Real-world outcomes of patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with programmed cell death protein-1-targeted immunotherapy
    Min Deng, Shaohua Li, Qiaoxuan Wang, Rongce Zhao, Jingwen Zou, Wenping Lin, Jie Mei, Wei Wei, Rongping Guo
    Annals of Medicine.2022; 54(1): 803.     CrossRef
  • Immune cell atlas of cholangiocarcinomas reveals distinct tumor microenvironments and associated prognoses
    Tao Xia, Keyu Li, Nan Niu, Yingkuan Shao, Ding Ding, Dwayne L. Thomas, Hao Jing, Kenji Fujiwara, Haijie Hu, Arsen Osipov, Chunhui Yuan, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Elizabeth D. Thompson, Robert A. Anders, Jin He, Yiping Mou, Adrian G. Murphy, Lei Zheng
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeted Therapies for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Simon Gray, Angela Lamarca, Julien Edeline, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Richard A. Hubner, Mairéad G. McNamara, Juan W. Valle
    Cancers.2022; 14(7): 1789.     CrossRef
  • Novel Palliative Chemotherapy for Cholangiocarcinoma
    Jung Won Jung, Sang Myung Woo
    The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract.2022; 27(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the systemic treatment of therapeutic approaches in biliary tract cancer
    O. Mirallas, D. López-Valbuena, D. García-Illescas, C. Fabregat-Franco, H. Verdaguer, J. Tabernero, T. Macarulla
    ESMO Open.2022; 7(3): 100503.     CrossRef
  • Aging and biliary tract cancers: Epidemiology, molecular biology, and clinical practice
    Xiaoling Weng, Xiaoling Song, Rong Shao, Fatao Liu, Yingbin Liu
    Aging and Cancer.2022; 3(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Xue-Gang Yang, Yan-Yuan Sun, De-Shan Li, Guo-Hui Xu, Xiao-Qi Huang
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lenvatinib Plus Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitor Beyond First-Line Systemic Therapy in Refractory Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Study in China
    Changying Shi, Yulong Li, Cheng Yang, Liang Qiao, Liukang Tang, Yuting Zheng, Xue Chen, Youwen Qian, Jiamei Yang, Dong Wu, Feng Xie
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapy in biliary tract cancers: Current evidence and future perspectives
    Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Raphael LC Araujo
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2022; 14(8): 1446.     CrossRef
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
    Hossein Taghizadeh, Gerald W. Prager
    Current Cancer Drug Targets.2022; 22(8): 639.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Natural Killer Cells in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Chemotherapy-Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Open-Label Phase 1/2a Trial
    Galam Leem, Sung-Ill Jang, Jae-Hee Cho, Jung Hyun Jo, Hee Seung Lee, Moon Jae Chung, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Da-Kyung Yoo, Hyo-Cheon Cheon, Jae-Eun Kim, Kyeong-Pill Lim, In-Hye Jung, Jung-Min Im, Yong-Yoon Chung, Seung Woo Park
    Cancers.2022; 14(17): 4229.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
    Chan Su Park, Min Je Sung, So Jeong Kim, Jung Hyun Jo, Hee Seung Lee, Moon Jae Chung, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Si Young Song, Jeong Youp Park
    Cancers.2022; 14(17): 4323.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Based on FOLFIRI for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma as Second-Line and Successive Treatment: A Real-World Study
    Peixin Huang, Xiaoyong Huang, Yingting Zhou, Guohuan Yang, Qiman Sun, Guoming Shi, Yi Chen, Quirino Lai
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • PD-1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer in a second-line setting: A retrospective analysis of a case series
    Sirui Tan, Jing Yu, Qiyue Huang, Nan Zhou, Hongfeng Gou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treating Biliary Tract Cancers: New Targets and Therapies
    Joseph Ho, Constance Fiocco, Kristen Spencer
    Drugs.2022; 82(17): 1629.     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapies in clinical development for biliary tract cancer
    Arndt Vogel, Melanie Bathon, Anna Saborowski
    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs.2021; 30(4): 351.     CrossRef
  • Spatial Distribution and Prognostic Implications of Tumor-Infiltrating FoxP3- CD4+ T Cells in Biliary Tract Cancer
    Hyung-Don Kim, Jwa Hoon Kim, Yeon-Mi Ryu, Danbee Kim, Sunmin Lee, Jaehoon Shin, Seung-Mo Hong, Ki-Hun Kim, Dong‐Hwan Jung, Gi‐Won Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Ki Byung Song, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Jae Ho Jeong, Kyu-pyo Kim, Sang-Yeob Kim, Changhoon Yoo
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(1): 162.     CrossRef
  • Clinically significant genomic alterations in the Chinese and Western patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Shifeng Xu, Yuan Guo, Yanwu Zeng, Zhijian Song, Xiaodan Zhu, Ning Fan, Zhilei Zhang, Guibing Ren, Yunjin Zang, Wei Rao
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Successful pembrolizumab treatment of microsatellite instability‐high intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report
    Yuki Ikeda, Michihiro Ono, Ginji Ohmori, Saki Ameda, Michiko Yamada, Tomoyuki Abe, Shigeyuki Fujii, Miri Fujita, Masahiro Maeda
    Clinical Case Reports.2021; 9(4): 2259.     CrossRef
  • Horizons on the Therapy of Biliary Tract Cancers: A State-of-the-art Review
    Ran Xue, Rong Li, Jianxin Wang, Weiping Tong, Jianyu Hao
    Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology.2021; 000(000): 000.     CrossRef
  • An Assessment of Combination of the Camrelizumab With Chemotherapy in Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancers
    Yi Yu, Shanshan Huang, Jun Chen, Feng Yu, Lin Zhang, Xiaojun Xiang, Jun Deng, Ziling Fang, Junhe Li, Jianping Xiong
    Cancer Control.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Jin Won Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(5): 342.     CrossRef
  • Phase 1b study of pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) plus Pembrolizumab in advanced solid cancers
    Kwang-Yu Chang, Nai-Jung Chiang, Shang-Yin Wu, Chia-Jui Yen, Shang-Hung Chen, Yu-Min Yeh, Chien-Feng Li, Xiaoxing Feng, Katherine Wu, Amanda Johnston, John S. Bomalaski, Bor-Wen Wu, Jianjun Gao, Sumit K. Subudhi, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Jorge M. Blando, Shalini S
    OncoImmunology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin/5-FU (mFOLFOX) versus irinotecan/5-FU (mFOLFIRI) chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer refractory to first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
    In Sil Choi, Ki Hwan Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Koung Jin Suh, Ji-Won Kim, Jin Hyun Park, Yu Jung Kim, Jin-Soo Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Jin Won Kim
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 154: 288.     CrossRef
  • IMbrave 151: a randomized phase II trial of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
    Stephen P. Hack, Wendy Verret, Sohail Mulla, Bo Liu, Yulei Wang, Teresa Macarulla, Zhenggang Ren, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Andrew X. Zhu
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case Report: Response With Immunotherapy in a Patient With Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gallbladder
    Chao Liu, Xiangwei Hua, Zhen Yang, Yuan Guo, Liqun Wu, Jinzhen Cai, Ling Li, Yaxuan Zhang, Ning Fan
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Durable Response of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor after Failure of Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for a Patient with Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
    Chien-Huai Chuang, Chiun Hsu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Practice.2021; 8(4): 152.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Gemcitabine/Cisplatin-Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Sang Hoon Lee, Hee Seung Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Dong Uk Kim, Seungmin Bang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(6): 1769.     CrossRef
  • Systemic treatment of advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer
    Wei Zhang, Hongyuan Zhou, Yingying Wang, Zewu Zhang, Guangtai Cao, Tianqiang Song, Ti Zhang, Qiang Li
    BioScience Trends.2020; 14(5): 328.     CrossRef
  • Overview of current targeted therapy in gallbladder cancer
    Xiaoling Song, Yunping Hu, Yongsheng Li, Rong Shao, Fatao Liu, Yingbin Liu
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13,683 View
  • 410 Download
  • 52 Web of Science
  • 49 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line Chemotherapy after Progression on Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Kyoungmin Lee, Kyunghye Bang, Changhoon Yoo, Inhwan Hwang, Jae Ho Jeong, Heung-Moon Chang, Dongwook Oh, Tae Jun Song, Do Hyun Park, Sang Soo Lee, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim, Jin-hong Park, Kyu-pyo Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(1):254-262.   Published online July 9, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.190
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Since the introduction of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+GEM) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), optimal second-line (2L) chemotherapy after progression is unclear. We assessed clinical outcomes of 2L chemotherapy for disease that progressed on 1L nab-P+GEM.
Materials and Methods
Among the 203 patients previously treated with 1L nab-P+GEM for mPDAC at Asan Medical Center, between February and December 2016, records of 120 patients receiving 2L chemotherapy after progression on nab-P+GEM were retrospectively reviewed. The response rate and survival were evaluated along with analysis of prognostic factors.
Results
Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin doublets (FOLFOX or XELOX) were used in 78 patients (65.0%), fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in 37 (30.8%), and liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil in two (1.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.29 months and 7.33 months from the start of 2L therapy. Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin regimens and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy did not yield significantly different median PFS (2.89 months vs. 3.81 months, p=0.40) or OS (7.04 months vs. 7.43 months, p=0.86). A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (> 2.2) and a short time to progression with 1L nab-P+GEM (< 6.4 months) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS with 2L therapy.
Conclusion
2L fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin doublets and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy after failure of 1L nab-P+GEM had modest efficacy, with no differences in treatment outcomes between them. Further investigation is warranted for the optimal 2L chemo-regimens and sequencing of systemic chemotherapy for patients with mPDAC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of a MUC5AC Antibody (NPC-1C) Administered With Second-Line Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel on the Survival of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Brandon M. Huffman, Atrayee Basu Mallick, Nora K. Horick, Andrea Wang-Gillam, Peter Joel Hosein, Michael A. Morse, Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Janet E. Murphy, Sharon Mavroukakis, Anjum Zaki, Benjamin L. Schlechter, Hanna Sanoff, Christopher Manz, Brian M. Wolp
    JAMA Network Open.2023; 6(1): e2249720.     CrossRef
  • Trend Analysis and Prediction of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea
    Hyeong Min Park, Young-Joo Won, Mee Joo Kang, Sang-Jae Park, Sun-Whe Kim, Kyu-Won Jung, Sung-Sik Han
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided ablation with the HybridTherm Probe as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A case–control study
    Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni, Maria Chiara Petrone, Michele Reni, Clelia Di Serio, Paola Maria Rancoita, Gemma Rossi, Gianpaolo Balzano, Walter Linzenbold, Markus Enderle, Emanuel Della-Torre, Francesco De Cobelli, Massimo Falconi, Gabriele Capurso, Paol
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(5): 383.     CrossRef
  • Phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the BIBABRAX study
    Jaime Feliu, Mónica Jorge Fernández, Teresa Macarulla, Bartomeu Massuti, Ana Albero, José Federico González González, Guillermo Quintero-Aldana, Juan Ignacio Delgado-Mingorance, Ana Fernández Montes, Carmen García Piernavieja, Manuel Valladares-Ayerbes, A
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2021; 87(4): 543.     CrossRef
  • Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG)
    H.S. Park, B. Kang, H.J. Chon, H.-S. Im, C.-K. Lee, I. Kim, M.J. Kang, J.E. Hwang, W.K. Bae, J. Cheon, J.O. Park, J.Y. Hong, J.H. Kang, J.H. Kim, S.H. Lim, J.W. Kim, J.-W. Kim, C. Yoo, H.J. Choi
    ESMO Open.2021; 6(2): 100049.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Beyond first line, where are we?
    Sara Cherri, Silvia Noventa, Alberto Zaniboni
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(17): 1847.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Mandana Kamgar, Sakti Chakrabarti, Aditya Shreenivas, Ben George
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2021; 30(4): 673.     CrossRef
  • Treatment optimization of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (Review)
    Anabela Barros, Catarina Pulido, Manuela Machado, Maria Brito, Nuno Couto, Olga Sousa, Sónia Melo, Hélder Mansinho
    International Journal of Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Real World Evidence on Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Emma Gränsmark, Nellie Bågenholm Bylin, Hakon Blomstrand, Mats Fredrikson, Elisabeth Åvall-Lundqvist, Nils O. Elander
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • FOLFIRINOX after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective comparison with FOLFOX and FOLFIRI schedules
    Francesca Foschini, Fabiana Napolitano, Alberto Servetto, Roberta Marciano, Eleonora Mozzillo, Anna Chiara Carratù, Antonio Santaniello, Pietro De Placido, Priscilla Cascetta, Giovanni Butturini, Isabella Frigerio, Paolo Regi, Nicola Silvestris, Sabina De
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic repeated pancreatectomy for isolated local recurrence in remnant pancreas following laparoscopic radical pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Two cases report
    Munseok Choi, Suk Jun Lee, Dong-Min Shin, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Woo Jung Lee, Chang Moo Kang
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2020; 24(4): 542.     CrossRef
  • Possibilities of palliative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer
    L. I. Moskvicheva, L. V. Bolotina
    Research and Practical Medicine Journal.2020; 7(4): 118.     CrossRef
  • 8,861 View
  • 312 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Benefit of Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Showing No Progression after First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin
Jaewon Hyung, Bumjun Kim, Changhoon Yoo, Kyo-pyo Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Heung-Moon Chang, Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):901-909.   Published online October 4, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.326
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). In ABC-02 study, the BTC patients received up to 6-8 cycles of 3-weekly GemCis; however, those without progression often receive more than 6-8 cycles. The clinical benefit of maintenance treatment in patients without progression is uncertain.
Materials and Methods
Advanced BTC patients treated with GemCis between April 2010 and February 2015 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were retrospectively analysed. The patients without progression after 6-8 cycles were stratified according to further treatment i.e., with or without further cycles of GemCis (maintenance vs. observation groups). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
Among the 740 BTC patients in the initial screen, 231 cases (31.2%) were eligible for analysis (111 in the observation group, 120 in the maintenance group). The median OS from the GemCis initiation was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.4 to 25.6) and 22.4 months (95% CI, 17.0 to 27.8) in the observation and maintenance groups, respectively (p=0.162). The median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 13.8) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.2), respectively (p=0.320).
Conclusions
GemCis maintenance is not associated with an improved survival outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT)
    Gael S. Roth, Loic Verlingue, Matthieu Sarabi, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Emmanuel Boleslawski, Karim Boudjema, Anne-Laure Bretagne-Bignon, Marine Camus-Duboc, Romain Coriat, Gilles Créhange, Thierry De Baere, Christelle de la Fouchardière, Clarisse Dromain, Ju
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 202: 114000.     CrossRef
  • Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study
    Do-Youn Oh, Aiwu Ruth He, Mohamed Bouattour, Takuji Okusaka, Shukui Qin, Li-Tzong Chen, Masayuki Kitano, Choong-kun Lee, Jin Won Kim, Ming-Huang Chen, Thatthan Suksombooncharoen, Masafumi Ikeda, Myung Ah Lee, Jen-Shi Chen, Piotr Potemski, Howard A Burris,
    The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2024; 9(8): 694.     CrossRef
  • Bevacizumab Erlotinib Switch Maintenance in Chemo-Responsive Advanced Gallbladder and Cholangiocarcinoma (BEER BTC): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial
    Anant Ramaswamy, Prabhat Bhargava, Sujay Srinivas, Akhil Kapoor, Bal Krishna Mishra, Anuj Gupta, Sarika Mandavkar, Sadhana Kannan, Deepali Chaugule, Rajshree Patil, Manali Parulekar, Chaitali Nashikkar, Suman Kumar Ankathi, Rajiv Kumar Kaushal, Deepali Na
    Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 42(27): 3218.     CrossRef
  • Defining the mode of action of cisplatin combined with NUC-1031, a phosphoramidate modification of gemcitabine
    Dillum Patel, Alison L. Dickson, Greice M. Zickuhr, In Hwa Um, Oliver J. Read, Clarissa M. Czekster, Peter Mullen, David J. Harrison, Jennifer Bré
    Translational Oncology.2024; 50: 102114.     CrossRef
  • Rational development of combination therapies for biliary tract cancers
    James J. Harding, Danny N. Khalil, Luca Fabris, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa
    Journal of Hepatology.2023; 78(1): 217.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Patient Pathways in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: Recent Advances and a French Perspective
    Cindy Neuzillet, Pascal Artru, Eric Assenat, Julien Edeline, Xavier Adhoute, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Anthony Turpin, Romain Coriat, David Malka
    Targeted Oncology.2023; 18(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Prolonged survival with first-line chemotherapy in advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Mascarenhas Chrystle, D'souza Sanyo
    BMJ Case Reports.2023; 16(3): e249681.     CrossRef
  • Survival Analysis of 1140 Patients with Biliary Cancer and Benefit from Concurrent Renin-Angiotensin Antagonists, Statins, or Aspirin with Systemic Therapy
    Valerie Gunchick, Rachel L McDevitt, Elizabeth Choi, Katherine Winslow, Mark M Zalupski, Vaibhav Sahai
    The Oncologist.2023; 28(6): 531.     CrossRef
  • A Practical Guide for the Systemic Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer in Canada
    Ravi Ramjeesingh, Prosanto Chaudhury, Vincent C. Tam, David Roberge, Howard J. Lim, Jennifer J. Knox, Jamil Asselah, Sarah Doucette, Nirlep Chhiber, Rachel Goodwin
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(8): 7132.     CrossRef
  • A Systematised Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
    Vivian Peirce, Michael Paskow, Lei Qin, Ruby Dadzie, Maria Rapoport, Samantha Prince, Sukhvinder Johal
    Targeted Oncology.2023; 18(6): 837.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in Italy: A Delphi consensus statement
    Lorenza Rimassa, Giovanni Brandi, Monica Niger, Nicola Normanno, Davide Melisi
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2023; 192: 104146.     CrossRef
  • Mutational signatures and processes in hepatobiliary cancers
    Ekaterina Zhuravleva, Colm J. O’Rourke, Jesper B. Andersen
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 19(6): 367.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
    Chan Su Park, Min Je Sung, So Jeong Kim, Jung Hyun Jo, Hee Seung Lee, Moon Jae Chung, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Si Young Song, Jeong Youp Park
    Cancers.2022; 14(17): 4323.     CrossRef
  • Emerging Systemic Therapies in Advanced Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: Review and Canadian Perspective
    Vincent C. Tam, Ravi Ramjeesingh, Ronald Burkes, Eric M. Yoshida, Sarah Doucette, Howard J. Lim
    Current Oncology.2022; 29(10): 7072.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Combining EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Agents on Cholangiocarcinoma Cells
    Boonyakorn Boonsri, Kiren Yacqub-Usman, Pakpoom Thintharua, Kyaw Zwar Myint, Thannicha Sae-Lao, Pam Collier, Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng, Noppadol Larbcharoensub, Brinda Balasubramanian, Simran Venkatraman, Isioma U. Egbuniwe, Dhanwant Gomez, Abhik Mukher
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(2): 457.     CrossRef
  • PD-1 Inhibitors Plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature
    Zhihong Wang, Tianmei Zeng, Yong Li, Ding Zhang, Zhengang Yuan, Mengli Huang, Yuan Yang, Weiping Zhou
    Frontiers in Immunology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Patients with Refractory Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Tumor Proportion Score as a Potential Biomarker for Response
    Junho Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Hee-Sang Hwang, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Dong Wook Oh, Tae Jun Song, Ki-Hun Kim, Shin Hwang, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim, Jin-hong Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Kyu-pyo Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Changhoon Yoo
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(2): 594.     CrossRef
  • Inhibition of ATR Increases the Sensitivity to WEE1 Inhibitor in Biliary Tract Cancer
    Ah-Rong Nam, Mei-Hua Jin, Ju-Hee Bang, Kyoung-Seok Oh, Hye-Rim Seo, Do-Youn Oh, Yung-Jue Bang
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 945.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of Metastatic or High-Risk Solid Cancer Patients by Targeting the Immune System and/or Tumor Burden: Six Cases Reports
    Andrea Nicolini, Paola Ferrari, Riccardo Morganti, Angelo Carpi
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(23): 5986.     CrossRef
  • 10,245 View
  • 337 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Phase I Dose-Finding Study of OPB-111077, a Novel STAT3 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Changhoon Yoo, Jihoon Kang, Ho Yeong Lim, Jee Hyun Kim, Myung-Ah Lee, Kyung-Hun Lee, Tae-You Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):510-518.   Published online June 13, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.226
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway might be a promising therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Materials and Methods
This study was a multicenter, open-label, non-comparative, dose escalating phase I study of OPB-111077, an oral STAT3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced HCC who failed on sorafenib. Continuous dosing (daily administration, 50 to 400 mg) and intermittent dosing (4-days on/3-days off administration: 300 to 900 mg) regimens were evaluated and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) were the primary endpoints.
Results
A total of 33 patients (19 for continuous dosing and 14 for intermittent dosing) were enrolled. One patient experienced a DLT with grade 3 dizziness, but the MTD was identified in neither the continuous nor the intermittent dosing cohorts. The RDs were determined to be 250 mg for the continuous dosing regimen and 600 mg for the intermittent dosing regimen. There was no treatment-related death; five patients (15.2%) had grade 3-4 toxicities including thrombocytopenia (6%), fatigue (3%), and dizziness (3%). No patients achieved complete or partial responses and the median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 2.8).
Conclusion
OPB-111077 was well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC after sorafenib failure, but only showed limited preliminary efficacy outcomes. Further investigation of the role of the STAT3 signaling pathway in HCC and the development of biomarkers for STAT3 inhibitors are warranted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Targeting JAK2/STAT3 for the treatment of cancer: A review on recent advancements in molecular development using structural analysis and SAR investigations
    Rupali Kohal, Priya Bisht, Ghanshyam Das Gupta, Sant Kumar Verma
    Bioorganic Chemistry.2024; 143: 107095.     CrossRef
  • Unraveling the complexity of STAT3 in cancer: molecular understanding and drug discovery
    Yamei Hu, Zigang Dong, Kangdong Liu
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Old and Emerging Therapeutic Targets
    Greta Pessino, Claudia Scotti, Maristella Maggi
    Cancers.2024; 16(5): 901.     CrossRef
  • Isoalantolactone exerts anti‐melanoma effects via inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and STAT3 signaling in cell and mouse models
    Jun‐Kui Li, Xiao‐Li Jiang, Zhu Zhang, Wen‐Qing Chen, Jun‐Jie Peng, Bin Liu, Pei‐Li Zhu, Ken‐Kin‐Lam Yung
    Phytotherapy Research.2024; 38(6): 2800.     CrossRef
  • Mechanisms and therapeutic prospect of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in liver cancer
    JunJun Jia, Xuelian Zhou, Qingfei Chu
    Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and therapeutic potential of STAT3: Opportunities and challenges in targeting HPV-mediated cervical carcinogenesis
    Divya Janjua, Kulbhushan Thakur, Nikita Aggarwal, Apoorva Chaudhary, Joni Yadav, Arun Chhokar, Tanya Tripathi, Udit Joshi, Anna Senrung, Alok Chandra Bharti
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 197: 104346.     CrossRef
  • Signaling pathways in liver cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy
    Yangtao Xue, Yeling Ruan, Yali Wang, Peng Xiao, Junjie Xu
    Molecular Biomedicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • STAT3: Key targets of growth-promoting receptor positive breast cancer
    Rui-yuan Jiang, Jia-yu Zhu, Huan-ping Zhang, Yuan Yu, Zhi-xin Dong, Huan-huan Zhou, Xiaojia Wang
    Cancer Cell International.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Discovery, Optimization, and Evaluation of Novel N-(Benzimidazol-5-yl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-amine Analogues as Potent STAT3 Inhibitors for Cancer Treatment
    Ru Wang, Ting-Ting Du, Wen-Qiang Liu, Yi-Chen Liu, Ya-Dong Yang, Jin-Ping Hu, Ming Ji, Bei-Bei Yang, Li Li, Xiao-Guang Chen
    Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2023; 66(17): 12373.     CrossRef
  • Polyphenols as potential metabolism mechanisms regulators in liver protection and liver cancer prevention
    Shuangfeng Li, Shuangshuang Yin, Hui Ding, Yingying Shao, Shiyue Zhou, Weiling Pu, Lifeng Han, Tao Wang, Haiyang Yu
    Cell Proliferation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Eupalinolide J Inhibits Cancer Metastasis by Promoting STAT3 Ubiquitin-Dependent Degradation
    Hongtao Hu, Haoyang Bai, Lili Huang, Bo Yang, Huajun Zhao
    Molecules.2023; 28(7): 3143.     CrossRef
  • Discovery of a Highly Potent and Orally Bioavailable STAT3 Dual Phosphorylation Inhibitor for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment
    Peng He, Aiwu Bian, Ying Miao, Wangrui Jin, Huang Chen, Jia He, Liting Li, Yue Sun, Jiangnan Ye, Mingyao Liu, Zhengfang Yi, Wenbo Zhou, Yihua Chen
    Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2022; 65(22): 15487.     CrossRef
  • STAT3 pathway in cancers: Past, present, and future
    Han‐Qi Wang, Qi‐Wen Man, Fang‐Yi Huo, Xin Gao, Hao Lin, Su‐Ran Li, Jing Wang, Fu‐Chuan Su, Lulu Cai,, Yi Shi, Bing Liu,, Lin‐Lin Bu
    MedComm.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Updates and Outlook
    Yinjie Fan, Hang Xue, Huachuan Zheng
    Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2022; Volume 9: 233.     CrossRef
  • Constant Activation of STAT3 Contributes to the Development of Adenomyosis in Females
    Takehiro Hiraoka, Yasushi Hirota, Shizu Aikawa, Rei Iida, Chihiro Ishizawa, Tetsuaki Kaku, Tomoyuki Hirata, Yamato Fukui, Shun Akaeda, Mitsunori Matsuo, Ryoko Shimizu-Hirota, Norihiko Takeda, Yutaka Osuga
    Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomarker‑driven phase Ib clinical trial of OPB‑111077 in acute myeloid leukemia
    Joaquín Martínez‑López, Pau Montesinos, Nieves López‑Muñoz, Rosa Ayala, Pilar Martínez‑Sánchez, Julian Gorrochategui, José Rojas‑Rudilla, Daniel Primo, Juan-Miguel Bergua‑Burgues, María Calbacho, Evelyn Acuña‑Cruz, José Pérez‑Simón, Adolfo De La Fuente, J
    Medicine International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel STAT3 Inhibitors Targeting STAT3 Dimerization by Binding to the STAT3 SH2 Domain
    Yaping Hua, Xing Yuan, Yun-heng Shen, Jinxin Wang, Waqas Azeem, Shuo Yang, Alexandra Gade, Seyed Mohammad Lellahi, Anne Margrete Øyan, Xisong Ke, Wei-dong Zhang, Karl-Henning Kalland
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Discovery of a Novel Potent STAT3 Inhibitor HP590 with Dual p-Tyr705/Ser727 Inhibitory Activity for Gastric Cancer Treatment
    Peng He, Ying Miao, Yue Sun, Aiwu Bian, Wangrui Jin, Huang Chen, Jiangnan Ye, Jia He, Yangrui Peng, Haijun Gu, Mingyao Liu, Zhengfang Yi, Yihua Chen
    Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2022; 65(19): 12650.     CrossRef
  • STAT3 and Its Targeting Inhibitors in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Mingjing Jiang, Bo Li
    Cells.2022; 11(19): 3131.     CrossRef
  • NAFLD and HBV interplay - related mechanisms underlying liver disease progression
    Evanthia Tourkochristou, Stelios F. Assimakopoulos, Konstantinos Thomopoulos, Markos Marangos, Christos Triantos
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An update on investigational therapies that target STAT3 for the treatment of cancer
    Matteo Santoni, Francesca Miccini, Alessia Cimadamore, Francesco Piva, Francesco Massari, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Rodolfo Montironi, Nicola Battelli
    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs.2021; 30(3): 245.     CrossRef
  • Rational drug design of benzothiazole-based derivatives as potent signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway inhibitors
    Dingding Gao, Nan Jin, Yixian Fu, Yueyue Zhu, Yujie Wang, Ting Wang, Yuehong Chen, Mingming Zhang, Qiang Xiao, Min Huang, Yingxia Li
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2021; 216: 113333.     CrossRef
  • NAFLD-Associated HCC: Progress and Opportunities
    Daniel Geh, Quentin M Anstee, Helen L Reeves
    Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2021; Volume 8: 223.     CrossRef
  • The therapeutic potential of mitochondrial toxins
    Manabu Kawada, Masahide Amemiya, Junjiro Yoshida, Tomokazu Ohishi
    The Journal of Antibiotics.2021; 74(10): 696.     CrossRef
  • Advances of Targeted Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Mengke Niu, Ming Yi, Ning Li, Kongju Wu, Kongming Wu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mitochondrial Plasticity Promotes Resistance to Sorafenib and Vulnerability to STAT3 Inhibition in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Shusil K. Pandit, Giada Sandrini, Jessica Merulla, Valentina Nobili, Xin Wang, Alessia Zangari, Andrea Rinaldi, Dheeraj Shinde, Giuseppina M. Carbone, Carlo V. Catapano
    Cancers.2021; 13(23): 6029.     CrossRef
  • Phosphotyrosine isosteres: past, present and future
    Robert A. Cerulli, Joshua A. Kritzer
    Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry.2020; 18(4): 583.     CrossRef
  • Rewiring Host Signaling: Hepatitis C Virus in Liver Pathogenesis
    Alessia Virzì, Armando Andres Roca Suarez, Thomas F. Baumert, Joachim Lupberger
    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine.2020; 10(1): a037366.     CrossRef
  • Quinazoline Ligands Induce Cancer Cell Death through Selective STAT3 Inhibition and G-Quadruplex Stabilization
    Jan Jamroskovic, Mara Doimo, Karam Chand, Ikenna Obi, Rajendra Kumar, Kristoffer Brännström, Mattias Hedenström, Rabindra Nath Das, Almaz Akhunzianov, Marco Deiana, Kazutoshi Kasho, Sebastian Sulis Sato, Parham L. Pourbozorgi, James E. Mason, Paolo Medini
    Journal of the American Chemical Society.2020; 142(6): 2876.     CrossRef
  • JAK/STAT signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Justin Jit Hin Tang, Dexter Kai Hao Thng, Jhin Jieh Lim, Tan Boon Toh
    Hepatic Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy
    Benedito A. Carneiro, Wafik S. El-Deiry
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.2020; 17(7): 395.     CrossRef
  • Targeting acute myeloid leukemia stem cells: Current therapies in development and potential strategies with new dimensions
    Yuxin Tan, Qiuji Wu, Fuling Zhou
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2020; 152: 102993.     CrossRef
  • Manipulation of JAK/STAT Signalling by High-Risk HPVs: Potential Therapeutic Targets for HPV-Associated Malignancies
    Ethan L. Morgan, Andrew Macdonald
    Viruses.2020; 12(9): 977.     CrossRef
  • STAT3 inhibition protects against neuroinflammation and BACE1 upregulation induced by systemic inflammation
    Périne Millot, Carine San, Evangeline Bennana, Baptiste Porte, Nicolas Vignal, Jacques Hugon, Claire Paquet, Benoit Hosten, François Mouton-Liger
    Immunology Letters.2020; 228: 129.     CrossRef
  • STAT3 Inhibitor OPB-51602 Is Cytotoxic to Tumor Cells Through Inhibition of Complex I and ROS Induction
    Lara Brambilla, Tanaya Lahiri, Michael Cammer, David E. Levy
    iScience.2020; 23(12): 101822.     CrossRef
  • Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Advances and Hopes
    Chen-Hao Zhang, Ming Li, You-Pei Lin, Qiang Gao
    Current Gene Therapy.2020; 20(2): 84.     CrossRef
  • STAT3 as a potential therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review
    Jiang-Jiang Qin, Li Yan, Jia Zhang, Wei-Dong Zhang
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Insights Into the Multiple Pathways Driving Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis-Derived Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kazuki Takakura, Tsunekazu Oikawa, Masanori Nakano, Chisato Saeki, Yuichi Torisu, Mikio Kajihara, Masayuki Saruta
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Direct Targeting Options for STAT3 and STAT5 in Cancer
    Anna Orlova, Christina Wagner, Elvin D. de Araujo, Dávid Bajusz, Heidi A. Neubauer, Marco Herling, Patrick T. Gunning, György M. Keserű, Richard Moriggl
    Cancers.2019; 11(12): 1930.     CrossRef
  • 10,229 View
  • 309 Download
  • 40 Web of Science
  • 39 Crossref
Close layer
Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Synchronous or Metachronous Malignancies from Other Organs Is Better than Those with Pancreatic Cancer Only
Su-Jin Shin, Hosub Park, You-Na Sung, Changhoon Yoo, Dae Wook Hwang, Jin-hong Park, Kyu-pyo Kim, Sang Soo Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Dong-Wan Seo, Song Cheol Kim, Seung-Mo Hong
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1175-1185.   Published online December 20, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.494
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Pancreatic cancer associated double primary tumors are rare and their clinicopathologic characteristics are not well elucidated.
Materials and Methods
Clinicopathologic factors of 1,352 primary pancreatic cancers with or without associated double primary tumors were evaluated.
Results
Of resected primary pancreatic cancers, 113 (8.4%) had associated double primary tumors, including 26 stomach, 25 colorectal, 18 lung, and 13 thyroid cancers. The median interval between the diagnoses of pancreatic cancer and associated double primary tumors was 0.5 months. Overall survival (OS) of pancreatic cancer patients with associated double primary tumors was longer than those with pancreatic cancer only (median, 23.1 months vs. 17.0 months, p=0.002). Patients whose pancreatic cancers were resected before the diagnosis of metachronous tumors had a better OS than patients whose pancreatic cancer resected after the diagnosis of metachronous tumors (48.9 months and 13.5 months, p=0.001) or those whose pancreatic cancers were resected synchronously with non-pancreas tumors (19.1 months, p=0.043). The OS of pancreatic cancer patients with stomach (33.9 months, p=0.032) and thyroid (117.8 months, p=0.049) cancers was significantly better than those with pancreas cancer only (17.0 months).
Conclusion
About 8% of resected pancreatic cancers had associated double primary tumors, and those from the colorectum, stomach, lung, and thyroid were common. Patients whose pancreatic cancer was resected before the diagnosis of metachronous tumors had better OS than those resected after the diagnosis of metachronous tumors or those resected synchronously.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic Radical Total Gastrectomy and Pancreatosplenectomy for Synchronous Cancer of the Stomach and Pancreas
    Motoki Ebihara, Kentoku Fujisawa, Shusuke Haruta, Hironori Uruga, Masaki Ueno
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Synchronous primary multiple cancer: distal cholangiocarcinoma of the intrapancreatic common bile duct and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor associated with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail
    G.R. Setdikova, E.A. Stepanova, A.N. Verbovsky, A.V. Semenkov
    Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2024; (8): 57.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatoduodenectomy after Ivor-Lewis Santi oesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. An European multicentre experience
    Alessandro D. Mazzotta, Pietro Addeo, Benedetto Ielpo, Michael Ginesini, Nicolas Regenet, Ugo Boggi, Philippe Bachellier, Olivier Soubrane
    Surgical Oncology.2024; 57: 102144.     CrossRef
  • The importance of hsa-miR-28 in human malignancies
    Seyede Fatemeh Hosseini, Setareh Javanshir-giv, Hanieh Soleimani, Homa Mollaei, Farzad Sadri, Zohreh Rezaei
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2023; 161: 114453.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous double primary malignancies of the pancreatic body and extrahepatic bile duct treated with pancreatoduodenectomy and splenic artery resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: a case report
    Takahiro Murokawa, Takehiro Okabayashi, Kenta Sui, Motoyasu Tabuchi, Jun Iwata
    Surgical Case Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Descriptive Study of the Types and Survival Patterns of Saudi Patients with Multiple Primary Solid Malignancies: A 30-Year Tertiary Care Center Experience
    Moustafa S. Alhamadh, Rakan B. Alanazi, Sultan T. Algarni, Ahmed Abdullah R. Alhuntushi, Mohammed Qasim Alshehri, Yusra Sajid Chachar, Mohammad Alkaiyat, Fouad Sabatin
    Current Oncology.2022; 29(7): 4941.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Head and Tail, a Double Trouble: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Daniel Paramythiotis, Georgia Fotiadou, Eleni Karlafti, Ioanna Abba Deka, Georgios Petrakis, Elisavet Psoma, Xanthippi Mavropoulou, Filippos Kyriakidis, Smaro Netta, Stylianos Apostolidis
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(11): 2709.     CrossRef
  • Ergebnisse nach Pankreaseingriffen aus Sicht der Betroffenen: Versorgungsforschung der Selbsthilfegruppe „Arbeitskreis der Pankreatektomierten e. V.“
    Ioannis Dimopoulos, Gabriele Meyer, Saleem Ibrahim Elhabash, Michele Sorleto, Carsten Gartung, Nils Ewald, Ulrich Klaus Fetzner, Lutz Otto, Friedhelm Möhlenbrock, Waldemar Uhl, Berthold Gerdes
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2021; 59(03): 214.     CrossRef
  • An extremely atypical presentation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pancreatic and hepatic metastases
    Lei Zhang, Xin Long, Zheng-Nan Hu, Yu Wu, Jia Song, Bi-Xiang Zhang, Wei-Xun Chen
    Medicine.2021; 100(20): e25785.     CrossRef
  • Clinical features of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a history of other primary malignancies: A retrospective analysis
    Hironori Hayashi, Koji Amaya, Tomokazu Tokoro, Kosuke Mori, Shunsuke Takenaka, Yuya Sugimoto, Yuto Kitano, Toru Kurata, Shunsuke Kawai, Atsushi Hirose, Tomoya Tsukada, Masahide Kaji, Koichi Shimizu, Kiichi Maeda
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Rare Case of Synchronous Esophageal and Pancreatic Malignancy
    Ali Khalifa, Arkady Broder
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Synchronous concomitant pancreatic acinar cell carcin and gastric adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of literature
    Tian Fang, Ting-Ting Liang, Yi-Zhuo Wang, Hai-Tao Wu, Shu-Han Liu, Chang Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(28): 8509.     CrossRef
  • A novel long non‑coding RNA TTN‑AS1/microRNA‑589‑5p/FOXP1 positive feedback loop increases the proliferation, migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cell lines
    Jing Zhao, Fang Wu, Jun Yang
    Oncology Letters.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multiple primary gastrointestinal tumors of gastric, pancreatic and rectal origin; a case report
    Abdullah Mohammed Aloraini, Hadeel Ayman Helmi, Nadia Abdulaziz Aljomah, Ahmad Mohmmed Zubaidi
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2021; 89: 106610.     CrossRef
  • A Newly Developed Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in a Patient with Advanced Thyroid Cancer under Long-Term Sorafenib Use
    Min Ji Kim, Han-Sang Baek, Sung Hak Lee, Dong-Jun Lim
    International Journal of Thyroidology.2021; 14(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • Long noncoding RNA LINC00514 accelerates pancreatic cancer progression by acting as a ceRNA of miR-28-5p to upregulate Rap1b expression
    Qing Han, Junhe Li, Jianping Xiong, Zhiwang Song
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Characterization of a Long-Term Survivor Double Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated with Gefitinib in Combination with Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and mFOLFOX6 as First and Second Line Therapy
    Oronzo Brunetti, Giuseppe Badalamenti, Simona De Summa, Angela Calabrese, Antonella Argentiero, Livia Fucci, Vito Longo, Domenico Galetta, Pia Maria Soccorsa Perrotti, Rosamaria Pinto, Daniela Petriella, Katia Danza, Stefania Tommasi, Francesco Leonetti,
    Cancers.2019; 11(6): 749.     CrossRef
  • 14,126 View
  • 241 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Multicenter Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, and S-1 as First-line Treatment for Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
Changhoon Yoo, Boram Han, Hyeong Su Kim, Kyu-pyo Kim, Deokhoon Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Jae-Lyun Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jung Han Kim, Dae Ro Choi, Hong Il Ha, Jinwon Seo, Heung-Moon Chang, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Dae Young Zang
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1324-1330.   Published online January 8, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.526
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Although gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been established as the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), overall prognosis remains poor. We investigated the efficacy of a novel triplet combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and S-1 (OIS) for advanced BTC.
Materials and Methods
Chemotherapy-naive patientswith histologically documented unresectable or metastatic BTC were eligible for this multicenter, single-arm phase II study. Patients received 65 mg/m2 oxaliplatin (day 1), 135 mg/m2 irinotecan (day 1), and 40 mg/m2 S-1 (twice a day, days 1-7) every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate. Targeted exome sequencing for biomarker analysis was performed using archival tissue.
Results
In total, 32 patients were enrolled between October 2015 and June 2016. Median age was 64 years (range, 40 to 76 years), with 24 (75%) male patients; 97% patients had metastatic or recurrent disease. Response rate was 50%, and median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 6.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8 to 8.8) and 12.5 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 18.0), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (32%), diarrhea (6%), and peripheral neuropathy (6%). TP53 and KRAS mutations were the most frequent genomic alterations (42% and 32%, respectively), and KRAS mutations showed a marginal relationship with worse OS (p=0.07).
Conclusion
OIS combination chemotherapy was feasible and associated with favorable efficacy outcomes as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC. Randomized studies are needed to compare OIS with gemcitabine plus cisplatin.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A phase 1 study of biweekly nab-paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1/LV for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers: TCOG T1216 study
    Hui-Jen Tsai, Shih-Hung Yang, Chin-Fu Hsiao, Hsiang-Fong Kao, Yung-Yeh Su, Yan-Shen Shan, Chia-Jui Yen, Jeng-Shiun Du, Chiun Hsu, I-Chen Wu, Li-Tzong Chen
    The Oncologist.2024; 29(10): e1396.     CrossRef
  • Liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NASOX): A multicenter phase I/IIa study
    Hyehyun Jeong, Bum Jun Kim, Choong-kun Lee, Inkeun Park, Dae Young Zang, Hye Jin Choi, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Tae Jun Song, Dongwook Oh, Sung-Hoon Moon, Kyu-pyo Kim, Zev Wainberg, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Changhoon Yoo
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 208: 114194.     CrossRef
  • Redox-responsive engineered hybrid nanomedicine for gallbladder cancer therapy via hyaluronic acid depletion
    Jinglin Zou, Cong Jiang, Xianglong Li, Tianyu Zhong, Shuqi Wang, Bo Wang, Dapeng Zhang, Ji-Na Hao, Yuanyuan Cao, Mengjia Guan, Peng Zhang, Bin Dai, Yongsheng Li
    Applied Materials Today.2023; 30: 101707.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Patient Pathways in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: Recent Advances and a French Perspective
    Cindy Neuzillet, Pascal Artru, Eric Assenat, Julien Edeline, Xavier Adhoute, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Anthony Turpin, Romain Coriat, David Malka
    Targeted Oncology.2023; 18(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Survival Analysis
    Junya Toyoda, Kota Sahara, Tomoaki Takahashi, Kentaro Miyake, Yasuhiro Yabushita, Yu Sawada, Yuki Homma, Ryusei Matsuyama, Itaru Endo, Timothy Pawlik
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(7): 2654.     CrossRef
  • Modified FOLFIRINOX Versus CISGEM Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA): A Randomized Phase II Study
    Jean marc Phelip, Jérôme Desrame, Julien Edeline, Emilie Barbier, Eric Terrebonne, Pierre Michel, Hervé Perrier, Laetitia Dahan, Vincent Bourgeois, Faiza Khemissa Akouz, Emilie Soularue, Valérie Lebrun Ly, Yann Molin, Thierry Lecomte, François Ghiringhell
    Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 40(3): 262.     CrossRef
  • Early Recurrence in Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma: Clinical Impact and Its Preoperative Predictive Score
    Yuji Shimizu, Ryo Ashida, Teiichi Sugiura, Yukiyasu Okamura, Katsuhisa Ohgi, Mihoko Yamada, Shimpei Otsuka, Takeshi Aramaki, Akifumi Notsu, Katsuhiko Uesaka
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(9): 5447.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as salvage therapy for patients with refractory advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study
    Liu-Fang Ye, Chao Ren, Long Bai, Jie-Ying Liang, Ming-Tao Hu, Hui Yang, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Feng-Hua Wang, Rui-Hua Xu, Yu-Hong Li, De-Shen Wang
    Investigational New Drugs.2021; 39(3): 836.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future Perspectives of Perioperative Therapy for Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Review
    Changhoon Yoo, Sang Hyun Shin, Joon-Oh Park, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Woohyung Lee, Ki-Byung Song, Dae-Wook Hwang, Jin-hong Park, Jae Hoon Lee
    Cancers.2021; 13(7): 1647.     CrossRef
  • Chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alexander A. Azizi, Angela Lamarca, Mairéad G. McNamara, Juan W. Valle
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2021; 163: 103328.     CrossRef
  • Modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective comparative study
    Lu Zou, Xuechuan Li, Xiangsong Wu, Jiujie Cui, Xuya Cui, Xiaoling Song, Tai Ren, Xusheng Han, Yidi Zhu, Huaifeng Li, Wenguang Wu, Xu’an Wang, Wei Gong, Liwei Wang, Maolan Li, Wan Yee Lau, Yingbin Liu
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel Combination of Bevacizumab with Chemotherapy Improves Therapeutic Effects for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective, Observational Study
    Sung-Nan Pei, Chun-Kai Liao, Yaw-Sen Chen, Cheng-Hao Tseng, Chao-Ming Hung, Chong-Chi Chiu, Meng-Che Hsieh, Yu-Fen Tsai, Hsiu-Yun Liao, Wei-Ching Liu, Kun-Ming Rau
    Cancers.2021; 13(15): 3831.     CrossRef
  • Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic biliary tract cancer after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (NIFTY): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b study
    Changhoon Yoo, Kyu-pyo Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Ilhwan Kim, Myoung Joo Kang, Jaekyung Cheon, Byung Woog Kang, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Kyung Won Kim, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, Baek-Yeol Ryoo
    The Lancet Oncology.2021; 22(11): 1560.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as salvage treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial
    Ali Belkouz, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Ron A. A. Mathôt, Ferry A. L. M. Eskens, Thomas M. van Gulik, Martijn G. H. van Oijen, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Johanna W. Wilmink, Heinz-Josef Klümpen
    British Journal of Cancer.2020; 122(5): 634.     CrossRef
  • miR‐373 inhibits autophagy and further promotes apoptosis of cholangiocarcinoma cells by targeting ULK1
    Pin Lv, Yi‐Fan Luo, Wen‐Yi Zhou, Ben Liu, Zheng Zhou, Yong‐Zhong Shi, Ren Huang, Chuang Peng, Zi‐Li He, Jun Wang, Hong‐Hui Zhang, Sheng‐Dan Nie
    The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2020; 36(6): 429.     CrossRef
  • Advances in adjuvant therapy of biliary tract cancer: an overview of current clinical evidence based on phase II and III trials
    A. Belkouz, J.W. Wilmink, N. Haj Mohammad, J. Hagendoorn, J. de Vos-Geelen, C.H.C. Dejong, M.Y.V. Homs, B. Groot Koerkamp, T.M. van Gulik, M.G.H. van Oijen, C.J.A. Punt, H. Klümpen
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2020; 151: 102975.     CrossRef
  • A retrospective study of patient-tailored FOLFIRINOX as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
    Ayhan Ulusakarya, Abdoulaye Karaboué, Oriana Ciacio, Gabriella Pittau, Mazen Haydar, Pamela Biondani, Yusuf Gumus, Amale Chebib, Wathek Almohamad, Pasquale F. Innominato
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overview of current targeted therapy in gallbladder cancer
    Xiaoling Song, Yunping Hu, Yongsheng Li, Rong Shao, Fatao Liu, Yingbin Liu
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm, three-centre, prospective study
    Keke Nie, Ling Zhang, Yunhong You, Hongmei Li, Xiuhui Guo, Zhongfa Zhang, Chunling Zhang, Youxin Ji
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ming-Liang Wang, Zhang-Yan Ke, Shuai Yin, Chen-Hai Liu, Qiang Huang
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2019; 18(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • Nal-IRI with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer - the NIFE trial (AIO-YMO HEP-0315) an open label, non-comparative, randomized, multicenter phase II study
    L. Perkhofer, A. W. Berger, A. K. Beutel, E. Gallmeier, S. Angermeier, L. Fischer von Weikersthal, T. O. Goetze, R. Muche, T. Seufferlein, T. J. Ettrich
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 10,215 View
  • 322 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
Close layer
Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Capecitabine, and Cisplatin Plus Bevacizumab for Initially Unresectable Gastric Cancer with Invasion of Adjacent Organs or Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis
Jwa Hoon Kim, Sook Ryun Park, Min-Hee Ryu, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-pyo Kim, Beom Su Kim, Moon-Won Yoo, Jeong Hwan Yook, Byung Sik Kim, Jihun Kim, Sun-Ju Byeon, Yoon-Koo Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(2):518-529.   Published online May 24, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.005
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, capecitabine, and cisplatin (DXP) plus bevacizumab (BEV) on initially unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) or paraaortic lymph node (PAN) metastatic gastric cancer (GC).
Materials and Methods
Patients with LAGC or unresectable PAN metastatic GC received six induction chemotherapy cycles (60 mg/m2 docetaxel intravenously on day 1, 937.5 mg/m2 capecitabine orally twice daily on days 1-14, 60 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 7.5 mg/kg BEV intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks), followed by conversion surgery. The primary endpoint was R0 resection rate.
Results
Thirty-one patients with invasion to adjacent organs but without PAN metastasis (n=14, LAGC group) or with PAN metastasis regardless of invasion (n=17, PAN group) were enrolled between July 2010 and December 2014. Twenty-seven patients (87.1%) completed six chemotherapy cycles. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neutropenia (71%), neutropenia with fever/infection (22.6%/3.2%), and stomatitis (16.1%). The clinical response and R0 resection rates were 64.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.6 to 82.0) and 64.5% (LAGC group, 71.4%; PAN group, 58.8%), respectively. The pathological complete regression rate was 12.9%. After a median follow-up of 44.5 months (range, 39.4 to 49.7 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 17.3) and 38.6 months (95% CI, 22.0 to 55.1), respectively.
Conclusion
Induction chemotherapy with DXP+BEV displayed antitumor activities with encouraging R0 resection rate and manageable toxicity profiles on patients with LAGC or PAN metastatic GC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab, Apatinib, and Recombinant Human Endothelial Inhibitor in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Liang Wang, Wei Li, Ya-Gang Liu, Cui Zhang, Wei-Na Gao, Li-Fei Gao, Wei long Zhong
    Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel/Cisplatin/Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study
    Deguo Yu, Zhenfeng Wang, Tingbang He, Lijun Yang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for gastric cancer
    Xuewei Li, Jun Xu, Jun Xie, Wenhui Yang
    Chinese Medical Journal.2022; 135(11): 1299.     CrossRef
  • Novel Drug Delivery Method Targeting Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes by Retrograde Infusion of Paclitaxel into Pigs’ Thoracic Duct
    Akira Saito, Natsuka Kimura, Yuji Kaneda, Hideyuki Ohzawa, Hideyo Miyato, Hironori Yamaguchi, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Ryozo Nagai, Naohiro Sata, Joji Kitayama, Kenichi Aizawa
    Cancers.2022; 14(15): 3753.     CrossRef
  • New therapeutic options opened by the molecular classification of gastric cancer
    Mihaela Chivu-Economescu, Lilia Matei, Laura G Necula, Denisa L Dragu, Coralia Bleotu, Carmen C Diaconu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(18): 1942.     CrossRef
  • Gastric cancer: Basic aspects
    Henrique O. Duarte, Joana Gomes, José C. Machado, Celso A. Reis
    Helicobacter.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 9,041 View
  • 312 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Potentially Improved Efficacy with Oxaliplatin-Containing Regimen
Changhoon Yoo, Bum Jun Kim, Kyu-pyo Kim, Jae-Lyun Lee, Tae Won Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Heung-Moon Chang
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):759-765.   Published online November 9, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.371
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer of the exocrine pancreas. Because of its rare incidence, the efficacy of chemotherapy in this patient population has been largely unknown. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic ACC who received chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
Between January 1997 and March 2015, 15 patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ACC who received systemic chemotherapy were identified in Asan Medical Center, Korea.
Results
The median age was 58 years. Eleven and four patients had recurrent/metastatic and locally advanced unresectable disease. The median overall survival in all patients was 20.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7 to 26.1). As first-line therapy, intravenous 5-fluorouracil were administered in four patients (27%), gemcitabine in five (33%), gemcitabine plus capecitabine in two (13%), oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) in two (13%), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy in two (13%). The objective response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy alone was 23% and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 8.4). After progression, second- line chemotherapy was administered in eight patients, while four patients received FOLFOX and the other four patients received gemcitabine. The ORR was 38%, and patients administered FOLFOX had significantly better PFS than those administered gemcitabine (median, 6.5 months vs. 1.4 months; p=0.007). The ratio of time to tumor progression (TTP) during first-line chemotherapy to TTP at second-line chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients administered FOLFOX (4.07; range, 0.87 to 8.30) than in those administered gemcitabine (0.12; range, 0.08 to 0.25; p=0.029).
Conclusion
Our results suggest that oxaliplatin-containing regimens may have improved activity against pancreatic ACC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comprehensive review of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular features and treatment
    Kenji Ikezawa, Makiko Urabe, Yugo Kai, Ryoji Takada, Hirofumi Akita, Shigenori Nagata, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 54(3): 271.     CrossRef
  • Pathological complete response with FOLFIRINOX therapy for recurrence of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma
    Katsuhito Teramatsu, Nao Fujimori, Masatoshi Murakami, Sho Yasumori, Kazuhide Matsumoto, Kohei Nakata, Masafumi Nakamura, Yutaka Koga, Yoshinao Oda, Yoshihiro Ogawa
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 17(4): 776.     CrossRef
  • Complete pathological response to pembrolizumab in pretreated pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma
    Valeria Merz, Francesca Maines, Stefano Marcucci, Chiara Sartori, Michela Frisinghelli, Chiara Trentin, Dzenete Kadrija, Francesco Giuseppe Carbone, Andrea Michielan, Armando Gabbrielli, Davide Melisi, Mattia Barbareschi, Alberto Brolese, Orazio Caffo
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A narrative review on rare types of pancreatic cancer: should they be treated as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas?
    Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus, Mauro Daniel Spina Donadio, Ângelo Borsarelli Carvalho de Brito, Arthur Conelian Gentilli
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Survival Outcomes and Genetic Characteristics of Resected Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma
    Alex B. Blair, Shannon N. Radomski, Joanne Chou, Mengyuan Liu, Thomas Clark Howell, Wungki Park, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Lei Zheng, Vinod P. Balachandran, Alice C. Wei, T. Peter Kingham, Michael I. D’Angelica, Jeffrey Drebin, Sabino Zani, Dan G. Blazer, Richa
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A case of unresectable ectopic acinar cell carcinoma developed in the portal vein in complete response to FOLFIRINOX therapy
    Shinnosuke Nakayama, Akihisa Fukuda, Tadayuki Kou, Manabu Muto, Hiroshi Seno
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 16(4): 610.     CrossRef
  • New treatment insights into pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: case report and literature review
    Fangrui Zhao, Dashuai Yang, Tangpeng Xu, Jiahui He, Jin Guo, Xiangpan Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A resected case of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas with liver metastasis following chemotherapy using modified FOLFIRINOX
    Shuhei Yamada, Haruka Motegi, Yoshiki Kurihara, Tomonori Shimbo, Isao Kikuchi, Toshiki Wakabayashi, Tsutomu Sato
    Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Simple Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment for Clinical Oncologists
    Ingrid Garajová, Marianna Peroni, Fabio Gelsomino, Francesco Leonardi
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(11): 9587.     CrossRef
  • Progressive nodule-like lesions on bilateral lower limbs
    FA Yang, KS Cheng, JW Chou
    Journal of Postgraduate Medicine.2023; 69(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Mixed pancreatic acinar cell-ductal adenocarcinoma: Complexities in diagnosis and treatment
    Abdullah Nasser, Catherine L. Forse, Cynthia Walsh, Terence Moyana, Rakesh Goel
    Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports.2022; 5: 100144.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Chemotherapy of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Our Experiences and Pooled Analysis of Literature
    Jian-Ying Xu, Wen-Long Guan, Shi-Xun Lu, Xiao-Li Wei, Wen-Jie Shi, Chao Ren, Yu-Hong Li, Sheng-Ping Li, Miao-Zhen Qiu, Feng-Hua Wang
    Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Successful conversion surgery after FOLFIRINOX therapy in a patient with advanced pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with a solitary peritoneal dissemination: A case report
    Sunao Uemura, Hiromichi Maeda, Nobuhisa Tanioka, Sachi Yamaguchi, Masaya Munekage, Hiroyuki Kitagawa, Tsutomu Namikawa, Shota Yamamoto, Takuhiro Kohsaki, Mitsuko Iguchi, Kazushige Uchida, Kazuhiro Hanazaki
    Cancer Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prolonged response on olaparib maintenance in metastatic pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma associated with a germline BRCA 2 mutation, revealed by severe panniculitis
    Margaux Lelong, Jean‐Luc Raoul, Yann Touchefeu, Jean‐Marie Berthelot, Paul Arnolfo, Tamara Matysiak‐Budnik, Hélène Senellart
    Clinical Case Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma
    Hideaki Takahashi, Masafumi Ikeda, Satoshi Shiba, Hiroshi Imaoka, Akiko Todaka, Kazuhiko Shioji, Kei Yane, Yasushi Kojima, Satoshi Kobayashi, Akinori Asagi, Masato Ozaka, Ryoji Takada, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Shigeru Horiguchi, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Eiichiro Suzuk
    Pancreas.2021; 50(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of chemotherapy combined with toripalimab in PD-L1–positive and high tumor mutation burden pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: case report
    Huanji Xu, Xin Wang, Sheng Zhou, Qiancheng Hu, Dan Cao
    Tumori Journal.2021; 107(6): NP24.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas
    Elena Busch, Wiebke Werft, Nina Bougatf, Thilo Hackert, Dirk Jäger, Christoph Springfeld, Anne Katrin Berger
    Pancreas.2021; 50(3): 300.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: A multi-center series on clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes
    Vishwajith Sridharan, Mari Mino-Kenudson, James M. Cleary, Osama E. Rahma, Kimberly Perez, Jeffrey W. Clark, Thomas E. Clancy, Douglas A. Rubinson, Lipika Goyal, Fateh Bazerbachi, Kavel H. Visrodia, Motaz Qadan, Aparna Parikh, Cristina R. Ferrone, Brenna
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(6): 1119.     CrossRef
  • Down‐regulation of metabolic pathways could offset the poor prognosis conferred by co‐existent diabetes mellitus in pancreatic (head) adenocarcinoma
    Nilesh Gardi, Madhura Ketkar, Ross A. McKinnon, Stephen J. Pandol, Shilpee Dutt, Savio G. Barreto
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2021; 91(11): 2466.     CrossRef
  • Pathological complete response in a patient with metastatic pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma who received a chemotherapy regimen containing cisplatin and irinotecan
    Hiromitsu Maehira, Hiroya Iida, Haruki Mori, Nobuhito Nitta, Aya Tokuda, Katsushi Takebayashi, Sachiko Kaida, Toru Miyake, Akiko Matsubara, Masaji Tani
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 14(6): 1772.     CrossRef
  • Survival Outcome and Prognostic Factors for Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis from the German Cancer Registry Group
    Ekaterina Petrova, Joachim Wellner, Anne K. Nording, Rüdiger Braun, Kim C. Honselmann, Louisa Bolm, Richard Hummel, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Sylke Ruth Zeissig, Kees Kleihues van Tol, Sylvia Timme-Bronsert, Peter Bronsert, Sergey Zemskov, Tobias Keck,
    Cancers.2021; 13(23): 6121.     CrossRef
  • The Unusual Suspects of the Pancreas—Understanding Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinomas and Adenomas
    Andreas Minh Luu, Tim Fahlbusch, Johanna Munding, Waldemar Uhl, Chris Braumann
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2020; 51(1): 172.     CrossRef
  • Long-term survival of two patients with recurrent pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation: A case report
    Mariacristina Di Marco, Riccardo Carloni, Stefania De Lorenzo, Elisa Grassi, Andrea Palloni, Francesca Formica, Stefano Brocchi, Daria Maria Filippini, Rita Golfieri, Giovanni Brandi
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(7): 1241.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted combined pancreatectomy/hepatectomy for metastatic pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: case report and review of the literature
    Anthony Michael Villano, Dany Barrak, Anish Jain, Erin Meslar, Pejman Radkani, Walid Chalhoub, Nadim Haddad, Emily Winslow, Thomas Fishbein, Jason Hawksworth
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 13(5): 973.     CrossRef
  • Patients With Acinar Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas After 2005
    Yuan Zong, Changsong Qi, Zhi Peng, Lin Shen, Jun Zhou
    Pancreas.2020; 49(6): 781.     CrossRef
  • One size does not fit all for pancreatic cancers: A review on rare histologies and therapeutic approaches
    Monica Niger, Michele Prisciandaro, Maria Antista, Melissa Anna Teresa Monica, Laura Cattaneo, Natalie Prinzi, Sara Manglaviti, Federico Nichetti, Marta Brambilla, Martina Torchio, Francesca Corti, Sara Pusceddu, Jorgelina Coppa, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Fili
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2020; 12(8): 833.     CrossRef
  • Successful BRAF/MEK inhibition in a patient with BRAFV600E-mutated extrapancreatic acinar cell carcinoma
    Elena Busch, Simon Kreutzfeldt, Abbas Agaimy, Gunhild Mechtersheimer, Peter Horak, Benedikt Brors, Barbara Hutter, Martina Fröhlich, Sebastian Uhrig, Philipp Mayer, Evelin Schröck, Albrecht Stenzinger, Hanno Glimm, Dirk Jäger, Christoph Springfeld, Stefan
    Molecular Case Studies.2020; 6(4): a005553.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic panniculitis and elevated serum lipase in metastasized acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: A case report and review of literature
    Rainer Christoph Miksch, Tobias S Schiergens, Maximilian Weniger, Matthias Ilmer, Philipp M Kazmierczak, Markus O Guba, Martin K Angele, Jens Werner, Jan G D'Haese
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(21): 5304.     CrossRef
  • The contemporary trend in worsening prognosis of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: A population-based study
    Nie Duorui, Bin Shi, Tao Zhang, Chuyao Chen, Chongkai Fang, Zhijun Yue, Peng Wu, Zhiming Wu, Xuewu Huang, Meng Li, Girijesh Kumar Patel
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(12): e0243164.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma diagnosed by BCL10 staining: A case report
    Kei YAMANE, Takayuki ANAZAWA, Toshihiko MASUI, Kazuyuki NAGAI, Seiichiro TADA, Kenta INOGUCHI, Kenzo NAKANO, Yuichiro UCHIDA, Akitada YOGO, Kyouichi TAKAORI, Shinji UEMOTO
    Suizo.2019; 34(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors of Acinar Cell Carcinomas
    Axel Egal, Jérôme Cros, Magali Svrcek, Laurence Chiche, Geneviève Belleannee, Flora Poizat, Lionel Jouffret, Frédérique Maire, Louis de Mestier, Pascal Hammel
    Pancreas.2019; 48(10): 1393.     CrossRef
  • EGFR amplification induces sensitivity to antiEGFR therapy in pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma
    Corentin Richard, Julie Niogret, Romain Boidot, Francois Ghiringhelli
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2018; 10(4): 103.     CrossRef
  • Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Rare Pancreatic Histotype Tumors
    Oronzo Brunetti, Giuseppe Aprile, Paolo Marchetti, Enrico Vasile, Andrea Casadei Gardini, Mario Scartozzi, Sandro Barni, Sara Delfanti, Fernando De Vita, Francesco Di Costanzo, Michele Milella, Chiara Alessandra Cella, Rossana Berardi, Ivana Cataldo, Aldo
    Pancreas.2018; 47(6): 759.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma—case report and literature review
    Zhang Xing-mao, Zhang Hong-juan, Li Qing, He Qiang
    BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Successful chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma
    Minami Hashimoto, Takuto Hikichi, Tomohiro Suzuki, Mayumi Tai, Osamu Ichii, Nobuo Matsuhashi, Eisaku Kita, Shintaro Takahashi, Yoshinori Okubo, Hando Hakozaki, Yutaka Ejiri, Hiromasa Ohira
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 10(6): 564.     CrossRef
  • 10,799 View
  • 372 Download
  • 36 Web of Science
  • 35 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor after Failure of Imatinib and Sunitinib: A Multicenter Study Based on the Management Access Program
Myoung Kyun Son, Min-Hee Ryu, Joon Oh Park, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-Yong Kim, Su Jin Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Sook Ryun Park, Yoon-Koo Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):350-357.   Published online July 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.067
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) reported in the GRID phase III trial in Korean patients.
Materials and Methods
Fifty-seven Korean patientswith advanced GISTwho experienced both imatinib and sunitinib failure were enrolled in the management access program between December 2012 and November 2013 and treated with regorafenib (160 mg orally once daily in a 3 weeks on /1 week off).
Results
None of the patients achieved a complete or partial response while 25 patients (44%) showed stable disease for ≥ 12 weeks. With a median follow-up of 12.7 months (range, 0.2 to 27.6 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8 to 5.3) and 12.9 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 17.7), respectively. Interestingly, 15 patients (26%) experienced an exacerbation of their cancer-related symptoms (abdominal pain in eight and abdominal distension in five) during the rest period for regorafenib, but all were ameliorated upon the resumption of regorafenib. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was a hand-foot skin reaction (25%). The regorafenib dose was reduced in 44 patients (77%) due to toxicity, which manifested mainly as a handfoot skin reaction (n=31).
Conclusion
This study confirmed the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced GIST after imatinib and sunitinib failure in Korean patients. Considering the exacerbation of the cancer-related symptoms observed during the rest periods, further exploration of the continuous dosing schedule of regorafenib is warranted in future clinical trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology
    Seiichi Hirota, Ukihide Tateishi, Yuji Nakamoto, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Shinji Sakurai, Hirotoshi Kikuchi, Tatsuo Kanda, Yukinori Kurokawa, Haruhiko Cho, Toshirou Nishida, Akira Sawaki, Masato Ozaka, Yoshito Komatsu, Yoichi Naito, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumiaki Tak
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 29(6): 647.     CrossRef
  • A randomised phase 2 study of continuous or intermittent dosing schedule of imatinib re-challenge in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours
    Hyung-Don Kim, Changhoon Yoo, Min-Hee Ryu, Yoon-Koo Kang
    British Journal of Cancer.2023; 129(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • Case Report: Should Regorafenib be prescribed as a continuous schedule in gastrointestinal stromal tumors? Three case reports on Regorafenib personalized schedule
    Maria Susanna Grimaudo, Alice Laffi, Nicolò Gennaro, Roberta Fazio, Federico D’Orazio, Laura Samà, Licia Vanessa Siracusano, Federico Sicoli, Salvatore Lorenzo Renne, Armando Santoro, Alexia Francesca Bertuzzi
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours
    Marin Golčić, Robin L. Jones, Paul Huang, Andrea Napolitano
    Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4081.     CrossRef
  • Medical oncological treatment for patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) – A systematic review
    Charlotte Margareta Brinch, Ninna Aggerholm-Pedersen, Estrid Hogdall, Anders Krarup-Hansen
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2022; 172: 103650.     CrossRef
  • Health-Related Quality of Life and Side Effects in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Deborah van de Wal, Mai Elie, Axel Le Cesne, Elena Fumagalli, Dide den Hollander, Robin L. Jones, Gloria Marquina, Neeltje Steeghs, Winette T. A. van der Graaf, Olga Husson
    Cancers.2022; 14(7): 1832.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Ryugo Teranishi, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Toshirou Nishida, Seiichi Hirota, Yukinori Kurokawa, Takuro Saito, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Kotaro Yamashita, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Masaaki Motoori, Takeshi Omori, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(7): 1164.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Regorafenib in the Management of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review
    Vahe Khachatryan, Asmaa Muazzam, Chandani Hamal, Lakshmi Sai Deepak Reddy Velugoti, Godfrey Tabowei, Greeshma N Gaddipati, Maria Mukhtar, Mohammed J Alzubaidee, Raga Sruthi Dwarampudi, Sheena Mathew, Sumahitha Bichenapally, Lubna Mohammed
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CT Image Examination Based on Virtual Reality Analysis in Clinical Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Zhiying Wang, Qiaoyan Qu, Ke Cai, Ting Xu, Zhihan Lv
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • The Use of Inhibitors of Tyrosine Kinase in Paediatric Haemato-Oncology—When and Why?
    Agnieszka Kaczmarska, Patrycja Śliwa, Monika Lejman, Joanna Zawitkowska
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(21): 12089.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Modeling Study of c-KIT/PDGFRα Dual Inhibitors for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Seketoulie Keretsu, Suparna Ghosh, Seung Joo Cho
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(21): 8232.     CrossRef
  • Regorafenib treatment outcome for Taiwanese patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: A prospective, non‑randomized, single‑center study
    Chia‑Hsiang Hu, Chun‑Nan Yeh, Jen‑Shi Chen, Chun‑Yi Tsai, Shang‑Yu Wang, Chi‑Tung Cheng, Ta‑Sen Yeh
    Oncology Letters.2020; 20(3): 2131.     CrossRef
  • Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib-Associated Adverse Events and Their Management in Colorectal and Gastrointestinal Stromal Cancers
    Ganfeng Xie, Yuzhu Gong, Shuang Wu, Chong Li, Songtao Yu, Zhe Wang, Jianfang Chen, Quanfeng Zhao, Jianjun Li, Houjie Liang
    Advances in Therapy.2019; 36(8): 1986.     CrossRef
  • Phase II Trial of Continuous Regorafenib Dosing in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Failure of Imatinib and Sunitinib
    Jae-Joon Kim, Min-Hee Ryu, Changhoon Yoo, Mo Youl Beck, Jung Eun Ma, Yoon-Koo Kang
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(11): e1212.     CrossRef
  • Growing Role of Regorafenib in the Treatment of Patients with Sarcoma
    Mark Agulnik, Steven Attia
    Targeted Oncology.2018; 13(4): 417.     CrossRef
  • Treatment patterns, efficacy and toxicity of regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumour patients
    Gustavo Schvartsman, Michael J. Wagner, Behrang Amini, Chrystia M. Zobniw, Van Anh Trinh, Andrea G. Barbo, Heather Y. Lin, Wei-Lien Wang, Anthony Paul Conley, Vinod Ravi, Dejka M. Araujo, Maria Alejandra Zarzour, Robert S. Benjamin, Shreyaskumar Patel, Ne
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence and risk of hematologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with regorafenib
    Bin Zhao, Hong Zhao
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(55): 93813.     CrossRef
  • 10,154 View
  • 371 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Real-Life Experience of Sorafenib Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea: From GIDEON Data
Do Young Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Sang Young Han, Jeong Heo, Hyun Young Woo, Soon Ho Um, Yeul Hong Kim, Young Oh Kweon, Ho Yeong Lim, Jung Hwan Yoon, Wan Sik Lee, Byung Seok Lee, Han Chu Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Seung Kew Yoon
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1243-1252.   Published online February 24, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.278
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to report real life experiences of sorafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea, using a subset of data from GIDEON (Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in HCC and of Its Treatment with Sorafenib; a large, prospective, observational study).
Materials and Methods
Between January 2009 and April 2012, a total of 497 patients were enrolled from 11 sites in Korea. Of these, 482 patients were evaluable for safety analyses. Case report forms of paper or electronic version were used to record safety and efficacy data from all patients.
Results
More patients of Child-Pugh A received sorafenib for > 8 weeks than did patients of Child-Pugh B (55.5% vs. 34.3%). Child-Pugh score did not appear to influence the starting dose of sorafenib, and approximately 70% of patients both in Child-Pugh A and B groups received the recommended initial daily dose of 800 mg (69.0% and 69.5%, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 8.5 months and 2.5 months. In Child-Pugh A patients, the median OS and TTP were 10.2 months and 2.5 months. The most frequent treatment-emergent drug-related adverse event was hand-foot skin reaction (31.7%), followed by diarrhea (18.0%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both Child-Pugh A (85.4%) and Child-Pugh B (84.8%) patients.
Conclusion
Sorafenib was well tolerated by Korean HCC patients in clinical settings, and the safety profile did not appear to differ by Child-Pugh status. Survival benefit in Korean patients was in line with that of a previous pivotal phase III trial (SHARP).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Sorafenib for 9,923 Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Analysis from National Health Insurance Claim Data in South Korea
    Sojung Han, Do Young Kim, Ho Yeong Lim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Yujeong Kim, Kookhee Kim, Bo Yeon Kim, So Young Yi, Dong-Sook Kim, Do-Yeon Cho, Jina Yu, Suhyun Kim, Joong-Won Park
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 116.     CrossRef
  • Locoregional treatment improves overall survival for liver cancer during second-line regorafenib or immune checkpoint inhibitor
    Po-Ting Lin
    American Journal of Cancer Research.2024; 14(3): 1306.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Review
    Florian P. Reiter, Najib Ben Khaled, Liangtao Ye, Changhua Zhang, Max Seidensticker, Mark op den Winkel, Gerald Denk, Andreas Geier, Enrico N. De Toni
    Digestive Diseases.2022; 40(5): 565.     CrossRef
  • Treatment efficacy by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy vs. sorafenib after liver-directed concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sojung Han, Hye Jin Choi, Seung-Hoon Beom, Hye Rim Kim, Hyein Lee, Jae Seung Lee, Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jinsil Seong, Jong Yun Won, Beom Kyung Kim
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2021; 147(10): 3123.     CrossRef
  • Hepatocellular cancer therapy in patients with HIV infection: Disparities in cancer care, trials enrolment, and cancer-related research
    Francesca Negri, Gabriele Missale, Anna Degli Antoni, Camillo Porta
    Translational Oncology.2021; 14(9): 101153.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Liver-Directed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Sequential Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase 2 Trial
    Beom Kyung Kim, Do Young Kim, Hwa Kyung Byun, Hye Jin Choi, Seung-Hoon Beom, Hye Won Lee, Seung Up Kim, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Jinsil Seong, Kwang-Hyub Han
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2020; 107(1): 106.     CrossRef
  • Transarterial Infusion of Epirubicin and Cisplatin Combined With Systemic Infusion of 5-Flurouracil Versus Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Refractoriness of Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Doxorubicin
    Sun Hong Yoo, Jung Hyun Kwon, Soon Woo Nam, Jong Yul Lee, Young Woon Kim, Dong Jae Shim, Sung Won Lee, Jeong Won Jang
    Cancer Control.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea between 2012 and 2014: an Analysis of Data from the Korean Nationwide Cancer Registry
    Young Eun Chon, Han Ah Lee, Jun Sik Yoon, Jun Yong Park, Bo Hyun Kim, In Joon Lee, Suk Kyun Hong, Dong Hyeon Lee, Hyun-Joo Kong, Eunyang Kim, Young-Joo Won, Jeong-Hoon Lee
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2020; 20(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Appraisal of Long-Term Outcomes of Liver-Directed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Invasion


    Sojung Han, Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jinsil Seong, Jong Yun Won, Dai Hoon Han, Beom Kyung Kim
    Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2020; Volume 7: 403.     CrossRef
  • Sorafenib: key lessons from over 10 years of experience
    Bernard Escudier, Francis Worden, Masatoshi Kudo
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(2): 177.     CrossRef
  • Liver Transplantation after Successful Downstaging with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus
    Hee Chul Nam, Pil Soo Sung, Ho Jong Chun, Dong Goo Kim, Jeong Won Jang, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2019; 19(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • 18F–fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of hepatocellular carcinoma as a prognostic predictor in patients with sorafenib treatment
    Pil Soo Sung, Hye Lim Park, Keungmo Yang, Seawon Hwang, Myeong Jun Song, Jeong Won Jang, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Ie Ryung Yoo, Si Hyun Bae
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2018; 45(3): 384.     CrossRef
  • Intra-Arterial TheraSphere Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres in the Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Protocol for the STOP-HCC Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial
    Nikhil Chauhan, Janet Bukovcan, Eveline Boucher, David Cosgrove, Julien Edeline, Bonnie Hamilton, Laura Kulik, Fayaz Master, Riad Salem
    JMIR Research Protocols.2018; 7(8): e11234.     CrossRef
  • Sorafenib: A Review in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Gillian M. Keating
    Targeted Oncology.2017; 12(2): 243.     CrossRef
  • Treatment options after sorafenib failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Imane El Dika, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2017; 23(4): 273.     CrossRef
  • Dickkopf-1 induces angiogenesis via VEGF receptor 2 regulation independent of the Wnt signaling pathway
    Sung Hoon Choi, Hyemi Kim, Hyun Gyu Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang-Hyub Han, Seung Up Kim
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(35): 58974.     CrossRef
  • 13,805 View
  • 308 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy of Imatinib in Patients with Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha–Mutated Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Changhoon Yoo, Min-Hee Ryu, Jungmin Jo, Inkeun Park, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Yoon-Koo Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):546-552.   Published online June 22, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.015
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harboring platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) mutations is low, therefore further investigation of the efficacy of imatinib in this subgroup was needed.
Materials and Methods
Patients with PDGFRA-mutant GISTs who received imatinib as primary therapy for advanced disease between January 2000 and June 2012 were identified from the GIST registry of Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Results
KIT and PDGFRA genotyping in 823 patients identified 18 patients (2%) with PDGFRA mutations who were treated with first-line imatinib. Exon 18 D842V substitution, non-D842V exon 18 mutations, and exon 12 mutations were detected in nine (50%), four (22%), and five (28%) patients, respectively. Objective response rate differed significantly between patients with the D842V mutation and those with non-D842V mutations (0% [0/5] vs. 71% [5/7], p=0.03). In all patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0 to 57.2) and 51.2 months (95% CI, 37.1 to 65.3), respectively. Significantly, poorer PFS was observed for patients with D842V-mutant GISTs than those with non-D842V PDGFRA-mutant GISTs: median 3.8 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 6.3) versus 29.5 months (95% CI, 18.3 to 40.7) (p < 0.001). Patients with the D842V mutation had poorer OS than those with non-D842V PDGFRA mutations: median 25.2 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 37.8) versus 59.8 months (95% CI, 43.0 to 76.5) (p=0.02).
Conclusion
Imatinib is active against non-D842V PDGFRA-mutant GISTs, whereas GISTs harboring the D842V mutation are primarily resistant to imatinib.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial
    Michael C. Heinrich, Robin L. Jones, Suzanne George, Hans Gelderblom, Patrick Schöffski, Margaret von Mehren, John R. Zalcberg, Yoon-Koo Kang, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Jonathan Trent, Steven Attia, Axel Le Cesne, Brittany L. Siontis, David Goldstein, Kjetil
    Nature Medicine.2024; 30(2): 498.     CrossRef
  • English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology
    Seiichi Hirota, Ukihide Tateishi, Yuji Nakamoto, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Shinji Sakurai, Hirotoshi Kikuchi, Tatsuo Kanda, Yukinori Kurokawa, Haruhiko Cho, Toshirou Nishida, Akira Sawaki, Masato Ozaka, Yoshito Komatsu, Yoichi Naito, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumiaki Tak
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 29(6): 647.     CrossRef
  • Establishing biomarkers for soft tissue sarcomas
    Anna M. Czarnecka, Paulina Chmiel, Piotr Błoński, Piotr Rutkowski
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2024; 24(6): 407.     CrossRef
  • First Description of the Clinical Activity of Avapritinib in Sporadic Mesenteric Desmoid Tumor
    Rebecca Ganzon, Wei Chen, Gabriel Tinoco, Jose I. Mayordomo
    Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer
    Ciprian Tomuleasa, Adrian-Bogdan Tigu, Raluca Munteanu, Cristian-Silviu Moldovan, David Kegyes, Anca Onaciu, Diana Gulei, Gabriel Ghiaur, Hermann Einsele, Carlo M. Croce
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Imatinib adherence prediction using machine learning approach in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Li Liu, Ze Yu, Hefen Chen, Zhujun Gong, Xiao Huang, Linhua Chen, Ziying Fan, Jinyuan Zhang, Jiannan Yan, Hongkun Tian, Xiangyu Zeng, Zhiliang Chen, Peng Zhang, Hong Zhou
    Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Drug Resistance Mechanisms and Treatment Options in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Summary and Update
    Chunxiao He, Zilong Wang, Jiaying Yu, Shuang Mao, Xi Xiang
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2024; 25(11): 1390.     CrossRef
  • Personalized and targeted therapies
    Magdalena Wiśniewska, Michał Wiśniewski, Marzena A. Lewandowska
    Physical Sciences Reviews.2023; 8(9): 2103.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Their Impact on Systemic Therapy Decision
    Mojca Unk, Barbara Jezeršek Novaković, Srdjan Novaković
    Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1498.     CrossRef
  • Precision Oncology in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Hiba Mechahougui, Montemurro Michael, Alex Friedlaender
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(5): 4648.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Advances in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
    Vinayak Venkataraman, Suzanne George, Gregory M Cote
    The Oncologist.2023; 28(8): 671.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours
    Marin Golčić, Robin L. Jones, Paul Huang, Andrea Napolitano
    Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4081.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) is Effective and Safe: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study with 108 Patients
    Stijn J. C. van der Burg, Deborah van de Wal, Evelyne Roets, Neeltje Steeghs, Johanna W. van Sandick, Martijn Kerst, Frits van Coevorden, Koen J. Hartemink, Xander A. A. F. A. Veenhof, Anne Miek Koenen, Nikki Ijzerman, Winette T. A. van der Graaf, Yvonne
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8660.     CrossRef
  • New treatment strategies for advanced-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumours
    Lillian R. Klug, Homma M. Khosroyani, Jason D. Kent, Michael C. Heinrich
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.2022; 19(5): 328.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Large-Scale, Multi-Institutional, Observational Study in China
    Peng Zhang, Ming Wang, Jian Li, Xiaodong Gao, Bo Zhang, Han Liang, Ye Zhou, Guoqing Liao, Fan Feng, Yanbing Zhou, Jiren Yu, Jun Zhang, Yongjian Zhou, Yingjiang Ye, Jiansi Chen, Qun Zhao, Kuntang Shen, Hui Cao, Kaixiong Tao
    Advances in Therapy.2022; 39(6): 2920.     CrossRef
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Colorectal Cancer: 2021 Update
    Elena K. Korngold, Courtney Moreno, David H. Kim, Kathryn J. Fowler, Brooks D. Cash, Kevin J. Chang, Kenneth L. Gage, Aakash H. Gajjar, Evelyn M. Garcia, Avinash R. Kambadakone, Peter S. Liu, Meghan Macomber, Daniele Marin, Jason A. Pietryga, Cynthia S. S
    Journal of the American College of Radiology.2022; 19(5): S208.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumors caused by novel germline variants in SDHB and KIT: a report of two cases and literature review
    Sean Rasmussen, Ashley Stueck, Bruce Colwell, Daniel Gaston, Michael Carter
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 15(5): 869.     CrossRef
  • An overview of agents and treatments for PDGFRA-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Yingchao Sun, Lei Yue, Pengfu Xu, Weiling Hu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A literature review and database of how the primary KIT/PDGFRA variant of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour predicts for sensitivity to imatinib
    Newton A.C.S. Wong, Christel Garcia-Petit, Adam Dangoor, Nicola Andrew
    Cancer Genetics.2022; 268-269: 46.     CrossRef
  • Correlation of treatment outcome in sanger/RT‑qPCR KIT/PDGFRA wild‑type metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors with next‑generation sequencing results: A single‑center report
    Mojca Unk, Alenka Bombač, Barbara Jezeršek Novaković, Vida Stegel, Vita Šetrajčič, Olga Blatnik, Gašper Klančar, Srdjan Novaković
    Oncology Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Cissimol P. Joseph, Sarah N. Abaricia, Michelle A. Angelis, Kathleen Polson, Robin L. Jones, Yoon-Koo Kang, Richard F. Riedel, Patrick Schöffski, César Serrano, Jonathan Trent, Eric D. Tetzlaff, Tuan Dong Si, Teresa Zhou, Ashley Doyle, Sebastian Bauer, Ma
    The Oncologist.2021; 26(4): e622.     CrossRef
  • Avapritinib in unresectable or metastatic PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Long-term efficacy and safety data from the NAVIGATOR phase I trial
    Robin L. Jones, César Serrano, Margaret von Mehren, Suzanne George, Michael C. Heinrich, Yoon-Koo Kang, Patrick Schöffski, Philippe A. Cassier, Olivier Mir, Sant P. Chawla, Ferry A.L.M. Eskens, Piotr Rutkowski, William D. Tap, Teresa Zhou, Maria Roche, Se
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 145: 132.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive values of the KIT11-mutated grading system in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study
    Ling-Jun Song, Hui-Juan Ge, Xiao-Qin Shi, Wei-Wei Shen
    Human Pathology.2021; 110: 31.     CrossRef
  • The Identity of PDGFRA D842V-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)
    Alessandro Rizzo, Maria Abbondanza Pantaleo, Annalisa Astolfi, Valentina Indio, Margherita Nannini
    Cancers.2021; 13(4): 705.     CrossRef
  • Clinical efficacy comparison of avapritinib with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with PDGFRA D842V mutation: a retrospective analysis of clinical trial and real-world data
    Margaret von Mehren, Michael C. Heinrich, Hongliang Shi, Sergio Iannazzo, Raymond Mankoski, Saša Dimitrijević, Gerard Hoehn, Silvia Chiroli, Suzanne George
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stellungnahme der AIO, DGHO und DGVS zur Nutzenbewertung von Avapritinib bei gastrointestinalen Stromatumoren (GIST)

    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2021; 59(04): 366.     CrossRef
  • Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in daily clinical practice
    Elisabeth M. P. Steeghs, Hans Gelderblom, Vincent K. Y. Ho, Quirinus J. M. Voorham, Stefan M. Willems, Katrien Grünberg, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(5): 990.     CrossRef
  • New FDA oncology small molecule drugs approvals in 2020: Mechanism of action and clinical applications
    Thais Cristina Mendonça Nogueira, Marcus Vinicius Nora de Souza
    Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.2021; 46: 116340.     CrossRef
  • Avapritinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Case Series and Review of the Literature From a Tertiary Care Center in India
    Saurav Verma, Rohit Reddy, Sheragaru Hanumanthappa Chandrashekhara, Shamim Ahmed Shamim, Sarthak Tripathy, Sameer Rastogi
    Future Science OA.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mutations of the c-Kit and PDGFRA Gene in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors among Hakka Population of Southern China
    S Wang, Q Zhang, H Wu, Z Yang, X Guo, F Wang, Z Yu, Z Zhong
    Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.2021; 24(6): 814.     CrossRef
  • Gene Expression Profiling of PDGFRA Mutant GIST Reveals Immune Signatures as a Specific Fingerprint of D842V Exon 18 Mutation
    Valentina Indio, Gloria Ravegnini, Annalisa Astolfi, Milena Urbini, Maristella Saponara, Antonio De Leo, Elisa Gruppioni, Giuseppe Tarantino, Sabrina Angelini, Andrea Pession, Maria Abbondanza Pantaleo, Margherita Nannini
    Frontiers in Immunology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Avapritinib in advanced PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (NAVIGATOR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial
    Michael C Heinrich, Robin L Jones, Margaret von Mehren, Patrick Schöffski, César Serrano, Yoon-Koo Kang, Philippe A Cassier, Olivier Mir, Ferry Eskens, William D Tap, Piotr Rutkowski, Sant P Chawla, Jonathan Trent, Meera Tugnait, Erica K Evans, Tamieka La
    The Lancet Oncology.2020; 21(7): 935.     CrossRef
  • Adult Jejuno-Jejunal Intussusceptions due to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
    Jayabal Pandiaraja
    Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology.2020; 41(04): 602.     CrossRef
  • Molecular modelling evaluation of exon 18 His845_Asn848delinsPro PDGFRα mutation in a metastatic GIST patient responding to imatinib
    Margherita Nannini, Giuseppe Tarantino, Valentina Indio, Gloria Ravegnini, Annalisa Astolfi, Milena Urbini, Antonio De Leo, Donatella Santini, Claudio Ceccarelli, Elisa Gruppioni, Annalisa Altimari, Paolo Castellucci, Stefano Fanti, Valerio Di Scioscio, M
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical relevance of molecular diagnostics in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer: European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) expert discussion and recommendations from the 17th European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)/World Congress on Gastrointestinal
    Alexander Baraniskin, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Lucjan Wyrwicz, Ulrich Guller, Harpreet S. Wasan, Tamara Matysiak-Budnik, Thomas Gruenberger, Michel Ducreux, Fatima Carneiro, Eric Van Cutsem, Thomas Seufferlein, Wolff Schmiegel
    European Journal of Cancer.2017; 86: 305.     CrossRef
  • A precision therapy against cancers driven by KIT/PDGFRA mutations
    Erica K. Evans, Alexandra K. Gardino, Joseph L. Kim, Brian L. Hodous, Adam Shutes, Alison Davis, Xing Julia Zhu, Oleg Schmidt-Kittler, Doug Wilson, Kevin Wilson, Lucian DiPietro, Yulian Zhang, Natasja Brooijmans, Timothy P. LaBranche, Agnieszka Wozniak, Y
    Science Translational Medicine.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitive PDGFRΑ mutations in GIST: Two cases and review of the literature
    Pieter A. Boonstra, Jourik A. Gietema, Albert J.H. Suurmeijer, Matthew R. Groves, Fernando de Assis Batista, Ed Schuuring, Anna K.L. Reyners
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(65): 109836.     CrossRef
  • Molecular subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor requiring specific treatments
    Michael Pogorzelski, Johanna Falkenhorst, Sebastian Bauer
    Current Opinion in Oncology.2016; 28(4): 331.     CrossRef
  • 12,019 View
  • 209 Download
  • 41 Web of Science
  • 38 Crossref
Close layer
Severe Imatinib-Associated Skin Rash in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients: Management and Clinical Implications
Sook Ryun Park, Min-Hee Ryu, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Mo Youl Beck, In Soon Lee, Mi Jung Choi, Mi Woo Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):162-170.   Published online September 1, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.017
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study evaluated the incidence of imatinib-associated skin rash, the interventional outcomes of severe rash, and impact of severe rash on the outcomes of imatinib treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 620 patients were administered adjuvant or palliative imatinib for GIST at Asan Medical Center between January 2000 and July 2012. This analysis focused on a group of 42 patients who developed a severe rash requiring major interventions, defined as dose interruption or reduction of imatinib or systemic steroid use.
Results
Of the 620 patients treated with imatinib, 148 patients (23.9%) developed an imatinibassociated skin rash; 42 patients (6.8%) developed a severe rash requiring major intervention. Of these, 28 patients (66.8%) successfully continued imatinib with interventions. Serial blood eosinophil levels during imatinib treatment were associated with skin rash and severity. A significant association was observed between successful intervention and blood eosinophil level at the time of intervention initiation. In metastatic settings, patients with severe rash requiring major interventions tended to show poorer progression-free survival than patients who did not require major intervention and patients with no rash, although this finding was not statistically significant (p=0.326).
Conclusion
By aggressive treatment of severe rash through modification of imatinib dose or use of systemic steroid, the majority of patients can continue on imatinib. In particular, imatinib dose intensity can be maintained with use of systemic steroid. Measuring the blood eosinophil levels may be helpful in guiding the management plan for skin rash regarding the intensity and duration of interventions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Lichenoid and psoriasiform drug induced rush during imatinib therapy: a clinical case
    Albina N. Khlebnikova, Valentina E. Shikina, Gayane E. Bagramova
    Almanac of Clinical Medicine.2024; 51(7): 417.     CrossRef
  • Untargeted metabolomics analysis reveals the potential mechanism of imatinib-induced skin rash in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Xiao Huang, Linhua Chen, Li Liu, Hefen Chen, Zhujun Gong, Jianbo Lyu, Yao Li, Qi Jiang, Xiangyu Zeng, Peng Zhang, Hong Zhou
    International Immunopharmacology.2024; 140: 112728.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Skin Toxicity in an in Vitro Reconstituted Human Epidermis Model Using Deep Learning
    Fangyao Hu, Sara F. Santagostino, Dimitry M. Danilenko, Min Tseng, Jochen Brumm, Philip Zehnder, Kai Connie Wu
    The American Journal of Pathology.2022; 192(4): 687.     CrossRef
  • Health-Related Quality of Life and Side Effects in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Deborah van de Wal, Mai Elie, Axel Le Cesne, Elena Fumagalli, Dide den Hollander, Robin L. Jones, Gloria Marquina, Neeltje Steeghs, Winette T. A. van der Graaf, Olga Husson
    Cancers.2022; 14(7): 1832.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with high‐risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with 3‐year adjuvant imatinib
    Yeong Hak Bang, Min‐Hee Ryu, Hyung‐Don Kim, Hyung Eun Lee, Yoon‐Koo Kang
    International Journal of Cancer.2022; 151(10): 1770.     CrossRef
  • Cutaneous toxicity of FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors
    Jiangxia Du, Hao Yan, Zhifei Xu, Bo Yang, Qiaojun He, Xiaohong Wang, Peihua Luo
    Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology.2021; 17(11): 1311.     CrossRef
  • Dermatologic adverse events of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors
    E. A. Shatokhina, A. G. Turkina, L. S. Kruglova
    Russian journal of hematology and transfusiology.2020; 65(2): 154.     CrossRef
  • Experience in Using Jumihaidokuto and Orengedokuto for Skin Disorders Caused by Molecular Target Drugs
    Koki MORI, Tatsuya HIROSE, Koji TANAKA, Atsuko TAKEDA, Masahiro UNO, Hajime TAKAGI
    Kampo Medicine.2020; 71(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Systemic Steroid Treatment for Imatinib-Associated Severe Skin Rash in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Phase II Study
    Eo Jin Kim, Min-Hee Ryu, Sook Ryun Park, Mo Youl Beck, Woo Jin Lee, Mi Woo Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang
    The Oncologist.2020; 25(11): e1785.     CrossRef
  • Review of adverse cutaneous reactions of pharmacologic interventions for COVID-19: A guide for the dermatologist
    Antonio Martinez-Lopez, Carlos Cuenca-Barrales, Trinidad Montero-Vilchez, Alejandro Molina-Leyva, Salvador Arias-Santiago
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.2020; 83(6): 1738.     CrossRef
  • Cystic acne due to imatinib therapy for chronic myelocytic leukemia
    Andrew Hwang, Andrew Iskandar, Michael del Rosario, Constantin A Dasanu
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2019; 25(4): 972.     CrossRef
  • Long‐term survival outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and surgical intervention in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A 14‐year, single‐center experience
    Jwa Hoon Kim, Min‐Hee Ryu, Changhoon Yoo, Heejung Chae, Hana Na, Moyoul Beck, Beom Su Kim, Moon‐Won Yoo, Jeong Hwan Yook, Byung Sik Kim, Ki‐Hun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yoon‐Koo Kang
    Cancer Medicine.2019; 8(3): 1034.     CrossRef
  • A successful approach to overcome imatinib-induced skin toxicity in a GIST patient
    Ingrid M.E. Desar, Carla M.L. van Herpen, Nielka P. van Erp, Suzanne E.J. Kaal, Peter C.M. van de Kerkhof, Winette T.A. van der Graaf
    Anti-Cancer Drugs.2016; 27(6): 576.     CrossRef
  • 11,289 View
  • 151 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
Second-Line Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Individual Patient-Level Data of Randomized Trials
Jaewon Hyung, Minsu Kang, Ilhwan Kim, Kyu-pyo Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Ji-Won Kim, In Sil Choi, Jin Hyun Park, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Jin Won Kim, Changhoon Yoo
Received July 16, 2024  Accepted October 15, 2024  Published online October 17, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.652    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head.
Materials and Methods
We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens.
Results
A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p =0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, 95% CI 0.93-2.07, p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, 95% CI 0.92-2.03, p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusion
Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.
  • 421 View
  • 47 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP