| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us
top_img
Cancer Research and Treatment > Volume 40(2); 2008 > Article
Cancer Research and Treatment 2008;40(2): 87-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2008.40.2.87
Discrepant Views of Korean Medical Oncologists and Cancer Patients on Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Do Yeun Kim, Bong Seog Kim, Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Ah Lee, Young Seon Hong, Sang Won Shin, Soon Nam Lee
0Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of InternalMedicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Korea. smdkdy@duih.org
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of InternalMedicine, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
2Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of InternalMedicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.
3Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of InternalMedicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
4Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of InternalMedicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
5Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of InternalMedicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study was designed to evaluate the communication gap between Korean medical oncologists and cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Cross sectional studies utilized the responses of 59 medical oncologists and 211 patients. To understand the communication gap, perceived reasons and nondisclosure of CAM use, reactions of physicians to disclosure, and expectations for CAM were analyzed. Data were compared with use of the chi- squared test.
RESULTS:
Both medical oncologists and patients were in accord that CAM use would privde the patients with a feeling of hope. The medical oncologists believed more often than patients to attribute CAM use for control over medical care decisions, for the treatment of an incurable disease or as a nontoxic approach (p<0.05). Regarding reasons for nondisclosure, medical oncologists were morelikely to think that physicians would not understand the use of CAM, discontinue treatment or disapprove of the use of CAM (p<0.0001). Patients attributed nondisclosure mainly to the lack of questioning about CAM. Medical oncologists were more likely to warn of the risks with CAM use and less likely to encourage the use of CAM than perceived by patients (p=0.01). Patients expected that CAM could cure disease, extend survival, relieve symptoms and improve the immune system or quality of life more often than medical oncologists (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION:
Given the discrepant views of medical oncologists and patients on the use of CAM, medical oncologists should be aware of the discrepancies and attempt to resolve any differences.
Key words: Medical oncologists;Alternative medicine;Attitude
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplementary Material  Supplementary Material
  E-Mail
Related article
Editorial Office
Korean Cancer Association
Room 1824, Gwanghwamun Officia
92 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-999, Korea
TEL : +82-2-792-1486   FAX : +82-2-792-1410   E-mail : journal@cancer.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Cancer Association. All rights reserved.        Developed in M2Community